JerzND

JerzND — CS2 Stats

FI76561198024483942[U:1:64218214]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,303Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,381Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,250Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28940 of 251272 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,739 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,250 -2,014 27 May – 7 Oct · 26 days played
20,34726,384peak 26,38427 May7 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,739 +0 30 Aug – 14 Sept · 2 observations
1,7391,739peak 1,73930 Aug14 Sept
26,411Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,739Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-05-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,739
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 12 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,134 below peak (26,384)
  • +3,903 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,905 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 750 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches17——
Win rate65%——
K/D0.53——
Headshot %62%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 12 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate53.4%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy13.6%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.861.061.070.21 short
Match win rate33.0%46.3%46.9%13.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJerzNDFACEITLevel 8 · 1,739 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,250 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,739csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning64
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–44Last 10056%Win rateLWWWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility6.3
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch1.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.4
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time588ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 9 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–0 · inferno, 6 Oct →
445msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 7 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 5 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 81% over 16anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2614–1254%-0.00
infernoC2511–1444%0.02
ancientS1812–667%0.00
nukeS1613–381%0.03
anubisC83–538%0.00
dust2—32–167%-0.01
overpass—31–233%0.02
cache—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

158,157Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
5,746Matches
33.0%Match win rate
53.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
8,502MVPs
2,702Hours (in match)
2,614Bombs planted
1,095Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4784,195
AWP14,742
MAC-102,856
MP92,591
FAMAS1,984

Lifetime map wins

8,848inferno
7,582nuke
3,462dust2
1,866vertigo
1,261train
93office
60cbble
56safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

311Matches
56%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
77.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2752%1.0015.1
Inferno2556%1.0413.9
Ancient2361%0.8814.0
Vertigo1471%1.1316.9
Anubis1354%0.9716.9
Overpass1155%1.0712.8
Nuke743%1.0618.7
Dust2475%1.5218.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
582msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
9.30HE damage / grenade
11.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6807% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–16-0.0315%7 Oct →
mirage13–30.0530%7 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0020%6 Oct →
inferno6–00.0638%6 Oct →
nuke13–60.0520%6 Oct →
dust213–110.0325%30 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0318%23 Sept →
mirage7–130.0129%16 Sept →
ancient6–130.0313%16 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0320%16 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0026%15 Sept →
anubis13–30.0411%15 Sept →
nuke13–100.0414%15 Sept →
ancient13–90.0823%14 Sept →
anubis13–80.0218%14 Sept →
mirage13–80.0133%14 Sept →
inferno13–50.0611%14 Sept →
inferno13–40.0211%10 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0124%10 Sept →
nuke13–110.0320%9 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0227%9 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0129%8 Sept →
nuke13–60.0325%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.1429%8 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0016%7 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0126%7 Sept →
mirage9–130.0117%7 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0032%7 Sept →
inferno13–80.0333%3 Sept →
inferno9–130.0125%27 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0136%27 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0019%27 Aug →
mirage11–130.0029%27 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0415%27 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0225%17 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0611%17 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0416%17 Aug →
mirage13–20.0221%17 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0015%12 Aug →
inferno13–20.1024%12 Aug →
ancient13–60.019%12 Aug →
mirage13–110.0211%12 Aug →
nuke13–40.0719%12 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0017%10 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.007%10 Aug →
nuke13–10.1619%9 Aug →
ancient13–40.0336%9 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0432%9 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0511%7 Aug →
ancient13–90.0112%7 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0229%7 Aug →
inferno11–130.0226%7 Aug →
nuke13–50.0017%7 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0117%7 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0228%7 Aug →
mirage13–100.0823%7 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0819%6 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0214%6 Aug →
inferno8–130.0012%6 Aug →
inferno10–130.0330%5 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0418%5 Aug →
nuke13–00.1226%5 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0915%1 Jul →
inferno13–30.0423%30 Jun →
inferno13–40.0211%30 Jun →
ancient13–80.0123%29 Jun →
nuke22–180.0036%29 Jun →
dust213–90.0323%28 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0819%28 Jun →
ancient13–60.0520%28 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.0622%28 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0413%28 Jun →
mirage13–80.0018%28 Jun →
anubis13–110.0724%25 Jun →
inferno7–130.0223%23 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0523%23 Jun →
ancient13–110.0131%17 Jun →
overpass13–40.0521%17 Jun →
nuke13–90.0626%17 Jun →
inferno11–130.0127%17 Jun →
mirage8–130.0519%17 Jun →
overpass4–13-0.0412%16 Jun →
inferno13–110.0526%16 Jun →
ancient16–140.0124%16 Jun →
inferno13–40.0927%16 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0721%16 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0615%9 Jun →
mirage9–130.0026%3 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0124%3 Jun →
inferno11–130.0117%2 Jun →
mirage12–160.0034%2 Jun →
nuke13–110.0318%2 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0720%2 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0328%2 Jun →
mirage9–130.0117%27 May →
nuke13–7-0.0413%27 May →
overpass6–130.0713%27 May →
inferno11–130.0021%27 May →
nuke9–13-0.0117%27 May →
inferno6–13-0.0223%27 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.