axel — CS2 Stats

FI76561198265274555[U:1:305008827]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,857Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning61

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateWWWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3

Aggression5.8

Utility5.5

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning6.1

Utility5.5

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time610ms+1ms

first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms

Headshot accuracy20.4%+2.1%

first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 8–13

13–1Biggest win — nuke

9Longest win streak

W3Current streak

6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13overpassWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	21	12–9	57%	0.01
cache	C	17	6–11	35%	0.01
mirage	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.00
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	0.03
inferno	A	13	8–5	62%	0.04
overpass	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.01
dust2	C	7	3–4	43%	0.04
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
sanctum	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

104Matches

55%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

87.5ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win

100%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	5	60%	1.22	15.4
Anubis	4	50%	1.38	19.8
Vertigo	3	0%	1.27	21.3
Inferno	1	100%	1.40	14.0
Mirage	1	0%	1.18	20.0
Overpass	1	0%	0.85	11.0
Dust2	1	0%	1.27	19.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.43	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy

35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.1%Spray accuracy

81.9%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

604msReaction time

22.2%T opening success

55.4%CT opening success

0.44Enemies flashed / flash

7.3%Flash assists

14.78HE damage / grenade

7.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4412 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.195% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–1	-0.01	18%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.10	21%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	15%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	16%	9 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	8%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.06	37%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.12	14%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	12%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.05	25%	21 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	17%	21 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.02	17%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	14%	21 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	13%	21 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.04	30%	3 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	43%	3 Jul →
overpass	10–13	-0.01	15%	3 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	14%	3 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.02	23%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–5	-0.06	21%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.07	19%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	19%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.05	24%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	29%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.08	32%	17 Jun →
overpass	13–4	-0.02	17%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.02	17%	17 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.01	18%	17 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	32%	17 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.02	19%	9 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.09	19%	9 Jun →
ancient	3–0	0.08	29%	9 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.13	17%	5 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.02	11%	5 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.07	10%	5 Jun →
inferno	4–13	0.02	19%	5 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	23%	5 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.04	13%	3 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.08	23%	3 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	18%	2 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	21%	29 May →
cache	13–11	0.06	8%	29 May →
cache	12–12	0.09	20%	22 May →
overpass	7–13	0.03	12%	20 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	25%	20 May →
ancient	13–8	0.03	25%	20 May →
cache	13–6	0.06	29%	8 May →
cache	10–2	0.02	31%	8 May →
cache	13–7	-0.10	7%	2 May →
cache	13–2	0.10	15%	1 May →
cache	12–12	0.00	17%	1 May →
cache	1–13	-0.09	10%	1 May →
cache	8–13	0.00	9%	29 Apr →
sanctum	9–6	0.11	13%	29 Apr →
poseidon	5–9	-0.04	0%	29 Apr →
nuke	8–13	0.04	25%	29 Apr →
cache	7–13	0.04	19%	29 Apr →
cache	10–13	-0.00	11%	29 Apr →
cache	1–13	-0.08	17%	29 Apr →
cache	13–3	-0.04	10%	29 Apr →
cache	5–13	0.00	10%	29 Apr →
cache	7–13	0.04	26%	29 Apr →
cache	11–13	0.03	30%	29 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	20%	26 Apr →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	8%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–5	0.12	17%	26 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	26%	20 Apr →
ancient	0–5	0.03	23%	20 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.06	8%	18 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.05	17%	18 Apr →
overpass	6–13	-0.02	11%	18 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.03	21%	18 Apr →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	27%	16 Apr →
ancient	0–13	-0.04	100%	16 Apr →
nuke	13–2	0.05	12%	16 Apr →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	13%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	21%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.05	26%	16 Apr →
overpass	10–13	0.01	10%	16 Apr →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	17%	16 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.03	23%	15 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.02	13%	15 Apr →
mirage	3–13	0.04	26%	12 Apr →
inferno	11–13	0.02	18%	12 Apr →
overpass	7–13	-0.00	9%	8 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	21%	8 Apr →
ancient	16–12	-0.03	15%	8 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.06	13%	8 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.05	13%	8 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.02	5%	8 Apr →
mirage	14–16	0.00	14%	4 Apr →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	14%	4 Apr →
overpass	0–3	-0.06	0%	4 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.08	17%	4 Apr →
inferno	16–13	0.05	18%	4 Apr →
anubis	13–11	0.04	20%	4 Apr →
nuke	11–13	0.04	14%	1 Apr →
ancient	13–10	0.03	12%	1 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.09	17%	1 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.00	21%	31 Mar →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	18%	31 Mar →