noaim

noaim — CS2 Stats

76561198417105699[U:1:456839971]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,277Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21934 of 260000 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +934 12 Aug – 12 Oct · 19 days played
22,85025,481peak 25,48112 Aug12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,530 +0 29 Aug – 15 Sept · 3 observations
1,5301,530peak 1,53029 Aug15 Sept
25,840Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,530Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 481 below peak (25,481)
  • +229 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnoaimFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,530csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning53
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −80ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time576ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 2–1 · ancient, 1 Oct →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 2–1 · ancient, 1 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · office, 3 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC187–1139%-0.01
ancientB158–753%0.03
anubisD102–820%0.01
trainA106–460%0.00
cacheD93–633%-0.01
dust2S97–278%0.04
infernoA95–456%0.01
vertigoS65–183%0.05
nukeS54–180%0.02
italy—41–325%0.00
overpass—21–150%-0.00
office—21–150%-0.01
fachwerk—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

463Matches
54%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
74.2ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4340%0.9013.8
Inferno2868%0.9813.5
Ancient2370%1.1915.3
Anubis1942%0.8814.3
Nuke1681%1.2517.6
Dust21450%1.0012.8
Vertigo50%0.7513.8
Train367%0.7511.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
70.7%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
565msReaction time
40.3%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
8.92HE damage / grenade
7.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–130.019%14 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0823%12 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0014%12 Oct →
ancient13–100.0117%12 Oct →
train13–7-0.0618%8 Oct →
anubis1–130.0519%8 Oct →
cache12–160.0314%7 Oct →
mirage13–30.0935%7 Oct →
vertigo13–100.098%4 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0423%2 Oct →
dust213–30.037%2 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0014%2 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0120%2 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0212%1 Oct →
train4–13-0.0713%1 Oct →
ancient2–10.2742%1 Oct →
train13–3-0.0113%30 Sept →
ancient9–130.0314%29 Sept →
inferno13–80.0310%29 Sept →
ancient13–100.1117%27 Sept →
inferno2–7-0.0710%27 Sept →
train13–6-0.1024%27 Sept →
dust213–110.0514%27 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0118%26 Sept →
dust213–20.0319%26 Sept →
ancient5–2-0.038%26 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0425%26 Sept →
ancient4–130.0411%23 Sept →
train7–130.0819%21 Sept →
dust210–130.0318%21 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0616%20 Sept →
overpass11–13-0.0319%19 Sept →
anubis4–130.0820%19 Sept →
dust213–50.1019%19 Sept →
fachwerk13–60.079%19 Sept →
italy7–130.0511%19 Sept →
vertigo13–20.147%19 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.068%16 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0114%16 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0418%16 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0323%16 Sept →
inferno13–60.0218%15 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0610%15 Sept →
anubis13–30.0713%15 Sept →
nuke13–100.0513%15 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0211%11 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0623%11 Sept →
ancient13–30.0915%11 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0413%11 Sept →
train13–50.098%11 Sept →
office10–13-0.044%11 Sept →
inferno13–40.0113%10 Sept →
inferno4–130.0422%10 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0221%9 Sept →
nuke8–130.0510%9 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0113%9 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0111%9 Sept →
italy6–13-0.029%9 Sept →
cache11–13-0.057%9 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0018%8 Sept →
nuke13–60.0422%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.0416%8 Sept →
ancient13–60.067%7 Sept →
mirage9–130.0816%7 Sept →
italy6–13-0.0410%6 Sept →
overpass13–30.0220%6 Sept →
train13–50.017%6 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0212%6 Sept →
train9–13-0.049%6 Sept →
vertigo13–30.099%6 Sept →
inferno13–80.0127%3 Sept →
train13–80.099%3 Sept →
office13–100.0119%3 Sept →
train10–130.0119%3 Sept →
italy13–40.017%3 Sept →
cache10–130.0312%3 Sept →
ancient13–80.0220%3 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0323%30 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0613%30 Aug →
anubis13–100.0813%30 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0313%30 Aug →
dust213–90.079%30 Aug →
dust213–60.085%30 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0318%30 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0915%28 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0020%28 Aug →
cache11–130.0116%28 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.049%28 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0219%28 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0421%28 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.045%20 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.017%20 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0411%19 Aug →
cache13–90.0316%19 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.019%17 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0415%17 Aug →
anubis4–130.0117%17 Aug →
mirage13–20.0911%17 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0112%12 Aug →
inferno13–20.0517%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.