scarfz — CS2 Stats

LT76561198371379780[U:1:411114052]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,301Tracked matches42%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,230Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating23,404Pink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning72

Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–44–7Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 29%
Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

6–3–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

8–10–2 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 24%
Avg reaction 521ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim9.2

Utility4.0

Positioning7.2

Opening Duels6.9

Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning7.2

Utility4.0

Mechanics8.5

Opening Duels9.1

Win Impact2.4

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time515ms−40ms

first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms

Headshot accuracy24.4%−2.1%

first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 4 Aug →

60%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 14 Jul →

359msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · mirage, 14 Jul →

13–1Biggest win · shelter, 12 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 18mirageWeakest map · 39% over 33

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	33	13–20	39%	0.01
dust2	B	24	13–11	54%	0.03
cache	S	18	12–6	67%	0.01
nuke	C	12	5–7	42%	0.00
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.00
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 33). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,171Lifetime kills

1.13K/D

4,216Matches

47.9%Match win rate

50.0%Headshot %

11.2%Shot accuracy

12,695MVPs

1,841Hours (in match)

3,235Bombs planted

1,180Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,451

M4A4 / M4A1-S12,795

Desert Eagle9,766

AWP9,218

P2000 / USP-S5,470

Glock-183,839

Negev2,927

SG 5531,605

Galil AR1,465

SSG 081,340

Lifetime map wins

7,403dust2

5,326inferno

2,487nuke

1,487vertigo

927train

365office

191cbble

160lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

278Matches

60%Win rate

1.30Avg K/D

95.6ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	57	67%	1.31	18.5
Dust2	40	60%	1.34	19.3
Anubis	26	73%	1.36	20.2
Inferno	15	47%	1.23	20.5
Ancient	12	92%	1.20	21.3
Cache	9	78%	1.65	17.4
Vertigo	5	80%	1.71	18.2
Nuke	5	60%	1.21	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.6%Spray accuracy

88.1%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

515msReaction time

68.9%T opening success

63.8%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

5.7%Flash assists

7.93HE damage / grenade

5.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4121 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 33 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	0.02	30%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.04	32%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.00	25%	16 Oct →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	21%	10 Oct →
cache	3–13	-0.04	35%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.06	19%	7 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.00	26%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	14%	3 Oct →
inferno	9–13	0.01	35%	26 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.06	28%	24 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	19%	24 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.06	17%	23 Sept →
cache	13–6	-0.01	19%	23 Sept →
dust2	5–13	0.01	24%	23 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	35%	22 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.01	22%	20 Sept →
mirage	7–13	0.01	17%	20 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	18%	17 Sept →
cache	8–13	0.02	32%	1 Sept →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	19%	27 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	32%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	25%	27 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	14%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.04	35%	20 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.03	24%	19 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.07	32%	19 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	13%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.09	24%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	35%	15 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	17%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	18%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.09	26%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	21%	12 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	20%	12 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.00	19%	12 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	26%	12 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.01	18%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	36%	12 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	14%	12 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.00	18%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.01	20%	8 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	25%	8 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	16%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	29%	8 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	23%	7 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	29%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.03	22%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	37%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	20%	5 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.00	33%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	17%	5 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.06	14%	4 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.03	14%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.15	33%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	21%	4 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.04	23%	30 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	33%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	25%	29 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.01	20%	29 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.08	35%	29 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.03	29%	26 Jul →
cache	6–5	-0.01	18%	26 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.12	34%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.06	30%	26 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.03	13%	25 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.10	0%	24 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	9%	23 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	33%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	20%	23 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	26%	23 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.05	25%	23 Jul →
mirage	4–10	-0.07	47%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	35%	23 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	16%	23 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.11	30%	22 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	23%	22 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.02	35%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	19%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	19%	21 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.04	21%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	35%	20 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	10%	16 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.04	31%	16 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	38%	15 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.06	24%	15 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	32%	14 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.06	60%	14 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.02	24%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	11%	14 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.00	30%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.10	26%	13 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.01	41%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	31%	13 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.05	23%	13 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.04	24%	12 Jul →
shelter	13–1	0.07	39%	12 Jul →