aimseskus

aimseskus — CS2 Stats

LT76561198895007518[U:1:934741790]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,063Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,639Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,856Top 50% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#55178 of 247939 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,856 -4,430 20 Jun – 22 Sept · 20 days played
21,85626,286peak 26,28620 Jun22 Sept
26,701Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,561Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-06-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,561
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 190 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,430 below peak (26,286)
  • -817 over 30 days · declining
  • -4,430 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,144 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches23——
Win rate48%——
K/D0.99——
Headshot %64%——

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate50.8%46.9%49.2%above
Shot accuracy16.2%13.0%13.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.071.081.120.05 short
Match win rate46.5%46.7%48.5%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaimseskusPREMIER21,856 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,561csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning49
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateLLLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility5.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch0.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 46 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning4.9
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time539ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy30.1%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 32.2% → last ⅓ avg 30.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 5 Sept →
71%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · inferno, 4 Jul →
328msFastest reaction time · 2–11 · dust2, 1 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 85% over 13nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3114–1745%0.01
dust2B3015–1550%0.01
cacheS1311–285%0.01
infernoD93–633%0.02
nukeD61–517%-0.00
anubis—31–233%-0.02
overpass—32–167%0.02
ancient—21–150%-0.03
train—10–10%0.09
vertigo—10–10%-0.02
office—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

89,719Lifetime kills
1.07K/D
4,348Matches
46.5%Match win rate
50.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band
11,822MVPs
1,724Hours (in match)
5,205Bombs planted
1,160Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,522
AWP15,610
SSG 086,741
MP91,097
FAMAS1,017

Lifetime map wins

6,674dust2
5,576inferno
1,478nuke
1,296train
1,279vertigo
1,104cbble
530office
103lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

424Matches
54%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
85.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2255%1.1315.9
Anubis1050%1.1316.6
Dust2956%1.2418.2
Nuke520%0.7913.8
Ancient475%1.3415.5
Inferno333%1.3324.0
Vertigo2100%1.2013.0
Train1100%1.9121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.9%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
6.5°Preaim
549msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
11.52HE damage / grenade
13.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.7581% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–13-0.0132%23 Sept →
inferno8–130.1232%22 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0147%18 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0416%18 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0126%11 Sept →
mirage13–50.0332%11 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0046%11 Sept →
mirage13–160.0220%6 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0214%6 Sept →
cache13–50.2037%5 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0133%5 Sept →
dust25–00.0150%5 Sept →
cache13–60.0341%4 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0015%2 Sept →
dust213–10.0344%2 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0131%2 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0124%2 Sept →
dust22–110.010%1 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0621%1 Sept →
mirage13–80.0436%1 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0442%31 Aug →
dust213–110.0337%30 Aug →
mirage13–110.0152%30 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0228%29 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0927%29 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0226%29 Aug →
dust213–60.0332%29 Aug →
mirage11–130.0516%29 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0318%28 Aug →
mirage13–40.1434%15 Aug →
dust21–70.0636%15 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0922%15 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0024%14 Aug →
anubis13–80.0121%14 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0133%13 Aug →
mirage13–50.0426%12 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0229%12 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0618%12 Aug →
cache13–110.0559%12 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.077%9 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0748%7 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0128%7 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0138%5 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0713%3 Aug →
dust213–80.0722%2 Aug →
train2–130.0957%31 Jul →
mirage13–90.0118%31 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0514%31 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0618%31 Jul →
cache5–10.0436%30 Jul →
overpass13–40.0737%30 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0612%30 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0410%30 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0117%30 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.050%24 Jul →
cache13–3-0.0216%22 Jul →
dust216–130.0133%22 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0230%22 Jul →
nuke11–130.0235%18 Jul →
inferno13–70.0422%17 Jul →
cache13–40.0731%17 Jul →
nuke13–100.0125%17 Jul →
mirage13–100.0828%17 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.1125%13 Jul →
dust213–70.1534%13 Jul →
mirage14–160.0321%9 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0031%9 Jul →
mirage3–00.1943%9 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0211%9 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0330%9 Jul →
dust23–130.0226%9 Jul →
dust211–1-0.0223%5 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0232%5 Jul →
inferno12–12-0.0222%5 Jul →
mirage13–10.1169%5 Jul →
inferno1–100.0617%5 Jul →
mirage11–130.0531%5 Jul →
dust29–130.0320%5 Jul →
ancient13–20.0029%5 Jul →
cache13–40.0821%4 Jul →
dust213–100.1023%4 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0219%4 Jul →
inferno8–80.0971%4 Jul →
dust25–20.1242%4 Jul →
mirage4–130.0641%4 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0146%4 Jul →
vertigo11–13-0.0236%3 Jul →
office13–4-0.0026%3 Jul →
dust213–70.0232%3 Jul →
dust28–130.0339%3 Jul →
mirage12–120.0131%3 Jul →
mirage2–8-0.0346%3 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0635%2 Jul →
mirage12–120.0142%2 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0524%1 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0225%20 Jun →
dust211–130.0134%20 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0630%20 Jun →
overpass4–13-0.0621%20 Jun →
overpass13–90.0627%19 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.