OscarZz

OscarZz — CS2 Stats

FI76561198245951188[U:1:285685460]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

333Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
758Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate58.8%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy20.9%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio2.101.031.05above
Match win rate42.3%45.2%45.7%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOscarZzFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning42
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–37–8Last 10055%Win rateLLWWLWWWTT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 8–7–5 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.2
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact3.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time557ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 26 Apr →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 29 Jan →
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 24 Apr →
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 31 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 8vertigoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS3221–1166%0.07
mirageS139–469%0.04
anubisB115–645%0.03
vertigoD93–633%0.04
ancientS86–275%0.06
overpassB63–350%0.04
cacheD62–433%0.01
nukeD62–433%0.04
train—43–175%0.04
dust2—30–30%0.02
basalt—11–0100%-0.02
office—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,300Lifetime kills
2.10K/D · Top 5% of Level 6 players
1,833Matches
42.3%Match win rate
58.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 6 players
20.9%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players
4,402MVPs
758Hours (in match)
1,209Bombs planted
393Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,778inferno
3,094dust2
1,708cbble
735nuke
467train
402vertigo
42office
17assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

121Matches
52%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
88.3ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno771%2.1320.7
Mirage650%1.3921.2
Vertigo560%1.8419.6
Overpass540%1.0916.6
Anubis475%1.5025.5
Nuke367%1.6018.0
Dust210%1.0014.0
Ancient1100%1.2520.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
550msReaction time
40.2%T opening success
29.9%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
8.96HE damage / grenade
5.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4152 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.8945% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass7–13-0.0317%14 Oct →
inferno0–8-0.1318%8 Oct →
cache13–80.0415%8 Oct →
ancient13–30.0713%8 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0121%8 Oct →
mirage13–100.0513%7 Oct →
train13–110.0422%7 Oct →
inferno13–20.0933%7 Oct →
cache12–120.0831%7 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0528%7 Oct →
cache13–40.0625%7 Oct →
anubis5–130.0630%7 Oct →
inferno6–130.0936%7 Oct →
nuke12–120.0533%7 Oct →
ancient13–90.0324%7 Oct →
anubis12–120.0112%1 Oct →
ancient13–60.0212%1 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0315%26 Sept →
inferno11–130.0216%26 Sept →
overpass8–13-0.0316%14 Jun →
vertigo10–130.0036%14 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.1019%14 Jun →
inferno13–30.0622%14 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0531%14 Jun →
cache3–13-0.0719%29 Apr →
cache10–13-0.0517%29 Apr →
inferno10–130.0711%28 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0111%28 Apr →
inferno3–130.0416%28 Apr →
inferno13–70.0622%27 Apr →
mirage11–130.0120%27 Apr →
anubis12–120.0416%27 Apr →
inferno6–130.1029%27 Apr →
nuke13–80.0324%26 Apr →
train4–130.0314%26 Apr →
anubis13–110.1411%26 Apr →
mirage13–20.0824%26 Apr →
inferno12–120.0827%26 Apr →
vertigo12–120.0816%26 Apr →
overpass13–40.0731%24 Apr →
inferno13–110.0618%24 Apr →
mirage10–130.0314%24 Apr →
inferno13–40.0615%28 Sept →
dust23–6-0.0720%26 Feb →
inferno13–80.0419%26 Feb →
basalt13–3-0.029%26 Feb →
inferno13–80.0730%26 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0414%25 Feb →
ancient5–130.0215%24 Feb →
inferno9–130.0114%24 Feb →
train13–60.037%23 Feb →
ancient13–100.1013%23 Feb →
mirage13–70.039%23 Feb →
inferno10–130.0116%23 Feb →
inferno13–50.0633%23 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.016%23 Feb →
dust211–130.0822%23 Feb →
train13–70.077%23 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0217%22 Feb →
mirage16–140.0219%22 Feb →
nuke0–3-0.010%22 Feb →
inferno13–50.0717%27 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0220%26 Apr →
anubis13–100.0515%26 Apr →
vertigo13–110.108%26 Apr →
anubis13–90.0312%26 Apr →
mirage13–90.2018%26 Apr →
inferno13–20.1018%26 Apr →
inferno13–90.1112%26 Apr →
inferno13–90.1715%26 Apr →
nuke11–130.0616%25 Apr →
anubis15–190.0410%25 Apr →
inferno13–50.1811%25 Apr →
vertigo13–40.0716%25 Apr →
vertigo4–13-0.0225%24 Apr →
anubis6–130.0612%24 Apr →
inferno6–130.0120%24 Apr →
mirage7–130.0719%24 Apr →
overpass13–100.0620%24 Apr →
ancient6–130.0415%24 Apr →
dust29–130.0615%24 Apr →
overpass12–16-0.0113%21 Apr →
ancient13–50.0722%15 Feb →
office7–13-0.0227%3 Feb →
anubis13–3-0.0233%31 Jan →
mirage13–20.1330%31 Jan →
ancient13–70.1120%31 Jan →
overpass13–00.1630%31 Jan →
inferno13–30.056%31 Jan →
inferno13–50.1841%29 Jan →
inferno13–80.0518%28 Jan →
inferno13–30.0613%28 Jan →
inferno12–60.1017%28 Jan →
mirage13–30.0218%27 Jan →
inferno13–30.1226%27 Jan →
vertigo6–13-0.0816%27 Jan →
nuke13–10.1210%26 Jan →
inferno13–60.1810%26 Jan →
vertigo13–100.1521%25 Jan →
inferno13–110.059%25 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.