Puffveli — CS2 Stats

FI76561198009006849[U:1:48741121]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,869Tracked matches66%Win rate2022Tracked since

4,399Hours in CS52Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,455Purple band · top ~18.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#30290 of 60066 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,073), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 2 median	Level 3 median	vs Level 3
Headshot rate	40.2%	40.9%	41.8%	1.6% short
Shot accuracy	9.0%	12.5%	11.9%	2.9% short
Kill/death ratio	1.02	0.95	0.97	above
Match win rate	38.1%	42.4%	43.5%	5.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning54

Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateTWWLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5

Aggression7.1

Utility2.4

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning5.4

Utility2.4

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time548ms−22ms

first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms

Headshot accuracy13.2%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–1

13–1Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

7–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 24anubisWeakest map · 42% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	24	14–10	58%	-0.00
nuke	B	22	11–11	50%	0.01
mirage	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.00
ancient	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.01
anubis	C	12	5–7	42%	0.01
cache	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
dust2	—	4	2–2	50%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

101,204Lifetime kills

1.02K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players

5,822Matches

38.1%Match win rate

40.2%Headshot %

9.0%Shot accuracy

10,923MVPs

1,932Hours (in match)

5,773Bombs planted

991Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,192

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,684

AWP8,983

P2000 / USP-S6,572

FAMAS5,854

Glock-184,859

MAC-103,845

Desert Eagle3,805

MP92,675

Galil AR1,877

Lifetime map wins

8,522nuke

8,040inferno

3,142dust2

2,954vertigo

1,732train

292cbble

190office

79lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches

33%Win rate

0.90Avg K/D

107.7ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	1	0%	0.94	17.0
Ancient	1	100%	2.15	28.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.0%Headshot accuracy

36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.1%Spray accuracy

78.5%Counter-strafing

11.7°Preaim

545msReaction time

35.3%T opening success

46.8%CT opening success

0.26Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

16.17HE damage / grenade

0.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.0099% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.26 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.303% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	15–15	-0.02	24%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.02	9%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	12%	30 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	16%	30 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	9%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	9%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	13%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	16%	29 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	8%	29 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.05	18%	29 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	11%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	5%	29 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	10%	28 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	15%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.01	13%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.07	13%	28 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.03	12%	27 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.00	12%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.10	20%	27 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	9%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	11%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.15	38%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.12	16%	26 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	6%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	20%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	9%	26 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	16%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.05	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	11%	26 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.02	8%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.02	19%	25 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.02	8%	25 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.06	8%	25 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	8%	24 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	7%	24 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	16%	24 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.05	15%	24 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.05	8%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.04	16%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.01	16%	23 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	10%	23 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	13%	23 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.06	11%	23 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	18%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.05	10%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.08	18%	21 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	9%	21 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.10	9%	21 Aug →
anubis	12–16	0.02	6%	20 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.00	14%	20 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	17%	20 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.09	20%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	13%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	23%	19 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.02	12%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	14%	19 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.05	8%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	15%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	5%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	12%	18 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	11%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.02	5%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.13	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	14%	17 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.04	12%	17 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	7%	17 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.06	17%	17 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.00	10%	17 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	11%	16 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	10%	16 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	5%	16 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	9%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	10%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.03	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	16%	14 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.09	10%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	13%	14 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.04	13%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.09	15%	13 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.07	9%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.07	15%	13 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	19%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	6%	13 Aug →
anubis	14–16	-0.05	17%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.09	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	18%	2 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	12%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	11%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	11%	26 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	12%	26 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	14%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.03	16%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	10%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	25%	25 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.04	9%	25 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	11%	25 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	9%	25 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	5%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.08	14%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	9%	24 Jul →