Juiss1 — CS2 Stats

FI76561197989580327[U:1:29314599]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,071Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,850Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.2 Developing

Premier CS Rating10,697Blue band · top ~51.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#41595 of 58981 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

10,697Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 10,697
Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,303 to go
Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,587), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	36.2%	43.7%	44.7%	8.5% short
Shot accuracy	12.4%	11.8%	12.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.75	1.02	1.04	0.29 short
Match win rate	40.3%	45.0%	45.2%	4.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning51

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateWLWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression8.0

Utility3.1

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning5.1

Utility3.1

Mechanics3.8

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time573ms−35ms

first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms

Headshot accuracy12.8%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 12.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 13–3

13–0Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

10–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 16mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	32	15–17	47%	-0.01
nuke	B	23	11–12	48%	-0.00
anubis	S	16	11–5	69%	-0.01
mirage	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.02
cache	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.02
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.02
ancient	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

93,650Lifetime kills

0.75K/D

5,989Matches

40.3%Match win rate

36.2%Headshot %

12.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players

9,982MVPs

2,650Hours (in match)

5,562Bombs planted

1,261Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,323

AWP19,918

M4A4 / M4A1-S17,218

Glock-185,246

P2000 / USP-S4,884

MAC-104,381

Desert Eagle3,718

MP93,703

P2502,566

Galil AR1,352

Lifetime map wins

23,072inferno

9,631nuke

3,095dust2

1,844train

1,579vertigo

397cbble

286lake

48office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

102Matches

49%Win rate

0.95Avg K/D

71.1ADR

31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	29	48%	0.99	15.1
Nuke	28	64%	1.11	14.5
Mirage	22	32%	0.86	14.3
Anubis	12	67%	1.03	15.5
Cache	4	50%	0.54	11.5
Dust2	3	33%	0.37	5.7
Overpass	3	0%	0.60	10.7
Ancient	1	0%	0.79	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.2%Headshot accuracy

36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

67.3%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

577msReaction time

36.3%T opening success

46.7%CT opening success

0.37Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

8.45HE damage / grenade

1.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.1598% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3744 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.2658% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–9	-0.12	6%	25 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	13%	25 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.05	16%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	11%	25 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.01	13%	25 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.03	7%	25 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	5%	25 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.02	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	13%	24 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	5%	24 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.00	5%	24 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	21%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	19%	24 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.03	6%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.07	4%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	10%	20 Aug →
anubis	12–16	0.04	13%	20 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	12%	20 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	1%	20 Aug →
nuke	16–12	-0.01	12%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	14%	16 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	12%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	17%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.04	24%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	14%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.05	13%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	28%	14 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	12%	14 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	16%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	17%	14 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.02	15%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	19%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–0	0.06	16%	14 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.12	33%	13 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	14%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	15%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.00	17%	13 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	23%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.02	16%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	15%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	7%	13 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.00	36%	12 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.01	21%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	23%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	5%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.02	29%	12 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	16%	12 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.03	18%	12 Aug →
inferno	12–16	0.07	20%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.17	60%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.04	15%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.06	18%	12 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	10%	11 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	16%	11 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	8%	11 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.07	13%	11 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	6%	11 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.00	19%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	5%	11 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	16%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	12%	11 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.00	9%	11 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	26%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.07	3%	11 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.06	15%	10 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	15%	10 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.04	31%	10 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.02	19%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	10%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.04	6%	10 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	26%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.00	7%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	12%	9 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	14%	9 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.02	9%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	19%	9 Aug →
inferno	12–16	-0.06	18%	9 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.03	13%	9 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.01	3%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	18%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	21%	9 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	13%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	6%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.06	9%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	7%	8 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	8%	8 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	20%	8 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	13%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	5%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.05	11%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	7%	8 Aug →
cache	7–2	0.02	0%	8 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.06	12%	7 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	15%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.00	14%	7 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	14%	7 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	13%	7 Aug →