rENA_^ — CS2 Stats

FI76561197994628533[U:1:34362805]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,938Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,889Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,636Purple band · top ~13.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#27012 of 60030 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,471 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,835Peak Premier on CSDB

1,471Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,471
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 60 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

199 below peak (18,835)
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,364 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,003), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	45.9%	47.0%	48.4%	2.5% short
Shot accuracy	17.4%	12.8%	13.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.03	1.07	1.08	0.05 short
Match win rate	39.0%	46.4%	47.0%	8.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning55

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateLWLTWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression8.3

Utility5.1

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels3.5

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning5.5

Utility5.1

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time547ms−51ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms

Headshot accuracy16.8%+0.4%

first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — nuke 13–3

13–2Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 55% over 11dust2Weakest map · 17% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	25	11–14	44%	0.04
inferno	B	17	8–9	47%	0.03
mirage	B	17	9–8	53%	0.02
dust2	D	12	2–10	17%	-0.03
anubis	A	11	6–5	55%	0.02
ancient	D	9	3–6	33%	0.04
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	0.03
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

279,805Lifetime kills

1.03K/D

11,323Matches

39.0%Match win rate

45.9%Headshot %

17.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players

21,574MVPs

4,889Hours (in match)

7,856Bombs planted

1,889Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47107,254

M4A4 / M4A1-S57,443

AWP37,132

Desert Eagle22,952

P2000 / USP-S14,881

FAMAS6,064

Glock-185,596

P2504,480

Galil AR2,499

SSG 082,219

Lifetime map wins

20,354dust2

15,878inferno

8,076nuke

4,181train

1,564cbble

1,496vertigo

105office

80dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,275Matches

52%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

87.8ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	54	57%	1.00	15.3
Nuke	48	69%	1.23	17.4
Mirage	37	38%	0.94	16.4
Ancient	32	41%	1.06	16.7
Dust2	26	35%	1.16	17.1
Anubis	24	58%	1.03	15.2
Train	9	78%	1.35	17.1
Vertigo	4	25%	0.88	17.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy

39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.6%Spray accuracy

86.2%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

546msReaction time

41.7%T opening success

46.5%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

5.5%Flash assists

11.71HE damage / grenade

7.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	14–16	-0.02	17%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.08	24%	30 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	13%	30 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.06	17%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	17%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.06	27%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	22%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.05	21%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.08	24%	29 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	20%	29 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	24%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	16%	29 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	29%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.11	15%	28 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.05	22%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.24	13%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.09	15%	28 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	13%	27 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	13%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	10%	27 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	5%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.06	17%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	17%	27 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.00	16%	26 Aug →
train	13–3	0.10	20%	26 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.01	16%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.08	18%	25 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	16%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	11%	24 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	10%	24 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	9%	23 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	21%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.08	9%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.14	20%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.02	13%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.13	12%	23 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.02	16%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.07	21%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	21%	21 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.07	14%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	32%	16 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.00	19%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	21%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.08	9%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.08	11%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	18%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.12	19%	15 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.00	18%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	19%	13 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	25%	13 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.01	14%	13 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.09	17%	13 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.04	18%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.04	26%	11 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	17%	11 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.06	17%	11 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	19%	6 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	30%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.07	22%	6 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.02	16%	6 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	13%	6 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.03	19%	5 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.04	20%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.08	10%	2 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	18%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	19%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	15%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	22%	27 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.09	11%	26 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.02	19%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.08	11%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	24%	26 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.10	20%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.03	32%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.02	14%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.04	23%	26 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.02	21%	26 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	7%	25 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	17%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.06	7%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	14%	25 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.04	15%	25 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.06	18%	25 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.10	15%	25 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	18%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.02	17%	25 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	19%	25 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	9%	25 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.05	9%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.05	14%	23 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	16%	23 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	21%	23 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	15%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	17%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	8%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.07	19%	21 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	22%	21 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.08	19%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.13	15%	21 Jul →