๐”ต๐”ช๐”ต

๐”ต๐”ช๐”ต โ€” CS2 Stats

76561199525488984[U:1:1565223256]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,446Tracked matches40%Win rate2024Tracked since
6,169Hours in CS137Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 ยท 1,338 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (42 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO ยท 1,338 โ†’ 1,338
+21Tracked matches ยท now 1,446
0.0ppWin rate ยท 40.0% โ†’ 40.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,338 +0 2 Sept โ€“ 24 Sept ยท 3 observations
1,3381,338peak 1,3382 Sept24 Sept
11,690Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,338Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
70Days played since 2026-03-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak โ€” 1,338
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 โ€” 13 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 ยท Level 5 ยท Level 4 ยท Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDBโ€™s own observation โ€” no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.8%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy1.6%13.0%13.2%11.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.821.061.070.25 short
Match win rate45.2%46.3%46.9%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐”ต๐”ช๐”ตFACEITLevel 8 ยท 1,338 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,338csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning49
Utility54

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44โ€“53โ€“3Last 10044%Win rateLWLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.02 avg rating ยท +1.9pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’41ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (โˆ’0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 5โ€“5 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 8โ€“12 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support โ€” Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first โ…“ avg 0.00 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.00
Reaction time616msโˆ’27ms
first โ…“ avg 643ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%+1.8%
first โ…“ avg 22.6% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating ยท 9โ€“3 ยท nuke, 15 Mar โ†’
75%Best headshot accuracy ยท 13โ€“0 ยท anubis, 20 Jul โ†’
445msFastest reaction time ยท 7โ€“13 ยท nuke, 22 Jul โ†’
13โ€“0Biggest win ยท anubis, 20 Jul โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9โ€“8In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map ยท 55% over 22infernoWeakest map ยท 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2212โ€“1055%-0.00
nukeB199โ€“1047%0.01
mirageD196โ€“1332%0.01
anubisC135โ€“838%-0.00
infernoD81โ€“713%0.00
cacheB63โ€“350%0.00
dust2โ€”32โ€“167%-0.05
vertigoโ€”32โ€“167%0.08
poseidonโ€”21โ€“150%-0.03
trainโ€”22โ€“0100%0.05
fachwerkโ€”10โ€“10%0.05
overpassโ€”11โ€“0100%0.04
italyโ€”10โ€“10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

83,784Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
3,271Matches
45.2%Match win rate
52.8%Headshot % ยท Top 25% of Level 8 players
1.6%Shot accuracy
11,351MVPs
3,606Hours (in match)
2,711Bombs planted
2,598Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,523
AWP7,007
Knife1,075

Lifetime map wins

5,952nuke
3,092dust2
2,978inferno
2,749vertigo
1,014train
35cbble
18office
17lake

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,537Matches
49%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
76.6ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage43449%1.0015.4
Ancient27148%0.9515.2
Nuke26654%0.9715.3
Anubis18847%1.0715.9
Dust212353%1.0415.6
Inferno10744%0.9714.8
Vertigo4349%1.0817.2
Overpass4250%0.9616.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
10.7ยฐPreaim
611msReaction time
26.2%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.89HE damage / grenade
10.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4086 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2026% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12โ€“16-0.048%3 Nov โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0524%2 Nov โ†’
anubis9โ€“13-0.0323%1 Nov โ†’
nuke13โ€“5-0.0432%31 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0231%7 Sept โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.0229%6 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“160.0425%6 Sept โ†’
ancient14โ€“160.0229%30 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.0124%27 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.0617%26 Aug โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.0220%25 Aug โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0115%23 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.0332%21 Aug โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0129%17 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“30.0624%11 Aug โ†’
ancient15โ€“19-0.0124%10 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0213%7 Aug โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0617%6 Aug โ†’
ancient2โ€“13-0.0627%31 Jul โ†’
anubis11โ€“130.0522%30 Jul โ†’
poseidon9โ€“40.1224%30 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“80.0824%29 Jul โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.0035%23 Jul โ†’
nuke7โ€“130.0518%22 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0623%21 Jul โ†’
anubis11โ€“130.0413%21 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“6-0.0218%20 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“00.0075%20 Jul โ†’
fachwerk6โ€“130.0524%18 Jul โ†’
mirage5โ€“130.0031%18 Jul โ†’
anubis2โ€“13-0.0512%11 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0118%10 Jul โ†’
ancient4โ€“13-0.0128%8 Jul โ†’
train13โ€“6-0.0219%8 Jul โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.1028%7 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“9-0.0239%7 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“10-0.0122%4 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“9-0.0313%3 Jul โ†’
nuke8โ€“130.0122%3 Jul โ†’
mirage5โ€“130.0817%1 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“7-0.0128%30 Jun โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.0311%27 Jun โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0320%27 Jun โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0517%26 Jun โ†’
ancient16โ€“14-0.0212%25 Jun โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0427%11 Jun โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0725%11 Jun โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0120%11 Jun โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0216%10 Jun โ†’
anubis16โ€“140.0429%10 Jun โ†’
overpass13โ€“60.0430%10 Jun โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.0324%8 Jun โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0128%7 Jun โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0318%7 Jun โ†’
mirage13โ€“100.0732%5 Jun โ†’
train13โ€“110.1129%5 Jun โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0135%4 Jun โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.1118%2 Jun โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.0632%1 Jun โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0123%1 Jun โ†’
ancient16โ€“12-0.0120%1 Jun โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.0817%31 May โ†’
italy8โ€“13-0.0330%31 May โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.0522%28 May โ†’
nuke13โ€“9-0.0320%26 May โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0121%26 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0153%24 May โ†’
anubis6โ€“13-0.0318%24 May โ†’
cache8โ€“13-0.0614%24 May โ†’
ancient5โ€“13-0.0530%23 May โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0523%23 May โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0520%20 May โ†’
ancient16โ€“140.0412%19 May โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0427%19 May โ†’
nuke2โ€“120.0025%18 May โ†’
cache11โ€“13-0.0123%16 May โ†’
anubis10โ€“13-0.0412%15 May โ†’
mirage13โ€“50.0226%13 May โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.0123%13 May โ†’
nuke5โ€“13-0.0444%12 May โ†’
ancient13โ€“5-0.0218%12 May โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.0514%11 May โ†’
inferno7โ€“130.0115%11 May โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.0726%7 May โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0018%6 May โ†’
ancient12โ€“16-0.0524%4 May โ†’
cache13โ€“40.1220%1 May โ†’
inferno7โ€“130.0227%28 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“9-0.0032%27 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.0525%5 Apr โ†’
vertigo0โ€“90.000%3 Apr โ†’
nuke8โ€“8-0.1311%27 Mar โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0429%26 Mar โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.0540%22 Mar โ†’
poseidon4โ€“9-0.196%20 Mar โ†’
vertigo9โ€“60.1929%20 Mar โ†’
vertigo9โ€“70.0542%15 Mar โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0812%15 Mar โ†’
nuke8โ€“80.2124%15 Mar โ†’
nuke9โ€“30.2237%15 Mar โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.