Scandal play

Scandal play — CS2 Stats

JP76561199471210990[U:1:1510945262]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,955Tracked matches70%Win rate2023Tracked since
4,165Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,479Blue band · top ~31.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,640 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,479 -7,241 1 Sept – 4 Nov · 15 days played
14,47921,720peak 21,7201 Sept4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,640 +0 1 Sept – 29 Oct · 3 observations
1,6401,640peak 1,6401 Sept29 Oct
21,720Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,640Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,640
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 111 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,241 below peak (21,720)
  • -5,277 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 521 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches19——
Win rate63%——
K/D1.57——
Headshot %61%——

Measured 29 Oct 2026 → 5 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate62.3%50.9%
Shot accuracy3.1%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.041.09
Match win rate48.9%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGScandal playFACEITLevel 10 · 1,640 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER14,479 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,640csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning78
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–33–6Last 10061%Win rateLLWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.3pp headshot accuracy · +56ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility3.2
Positioning7.8
Opening Duels6.6
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning7.8
Utility3.2
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels7.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time597ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy25.3%−6.7%
first ⅓ avg 32.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 11 Oct →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 4 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · anubis, 20 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 3 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
14–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 91% over 11nukeWeakest map · 46% over 35
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB3516–1946%0.04
mirageS1410–471%0.04
ancientS139–469%0.04
cacheS128–467%0.04
anubisS1110–191%0.04
infernoA53–260%0.05
dust2—42–250%0.01
vertigo—42–250%0.05
poseidon—11–0100%0.07
train—10–10%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 35). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,036Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
3,441Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
62.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
3.1%Shot accuracy
9,901MVPs
1,612Hours (in match)
3,799Bombs planted
699Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,751nuke
3,506inferno
1,909vertigo
1,545dust2
674train
129office
34italy
12ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

345Matches
54%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
88.0ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11055%1.1617.6
Nuke7163%1.3319.9
Ancient5159%1.2218.3
Anubis3653%1.3120.8
Inferno2850%1.0716.3
Dust22425%0.9815.1
Cache1136%1.1820.4
Overpass580%1.1017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
579msReaction time
64.8%T opening success
57.7%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
8.79HE damage / grenade
2.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3419 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 35 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–130.0428%4 Nov →
mirage3–130.1129%4 Nov →
poseidon9–00.0726%4 Nov →
ancient10–130.0622%3 Nov →
nuke13–10.1831%3 Nov →
mirage13–60.1024%3 Nov →
cache13–40.1031%3 Nov →
cache3–130.0025%3 Nov →
mirage13–90.0444%3 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0118%3 Nov →
anubis13–110.0115%3 Nov →
anubis13–30.0420%3 Nov →
ancient22–180.0324%31 Oct →
nuke13–40.1334%31 Oct →
nuke7–130.0326%31 Oct →
vertigo12–160.0630%26 Oct →
vertigo11–130.0224%26 Oct →
nuke13–70.1231%26 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0216%26 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0217%26 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0311%25 Oct →
mirage13–70.0530%25 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0025%25 Oct →
inferno13–50.0525%24 Oct →
mirage13–110.0422%24 Oct →
mirage13–50.0536%24 Oct →
nuke13–110.0527%24 Oct →
nuke13–90.0821%24 Oct →
ancient13–40.0518%21 Oct →
cache9–130.0015%21 Oct →
nuke13–100.0629%21 Oct →
nuke7–130.0441%21 Oct →
ancient13–50.0320%21 Oct →
inferno13–80.0430%20 Oct →
anubis13–80.0423%20 Oct →
cache22–200.0942%20 Oct →
mirage3–130.0830%20 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0334%12 Oct →
cache13–60.0818%12 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0231%12 Oct →
cache13–110.0332%12 Oct →
inferno13–80.0732%12 Oct →
nuke11–130.0630%11 Oct →
mirage10–130.0519%11 Oct →
inferno8–80.1126%11 Oct →
nuke8–80.0930%11 Oct →
anubis13–40.2026%11 Oct →
nuke13–90.0133%11 Oct →
mirage13–70.0428%10 Oct →
nuke11–130.0426%10 Oct →
nuke9–130.0526%10 Oct →
ancient9–130.0514%10 Oct →
mirage13–110.0118%10 Oct →
anubis19–170.0319%10 Oct →
ancient13–60.0821%10 Oct →
ancient6–130.0433%8 Oct →
anubis13–110.0420%8 Oct →
nuke13–110.0428%8 Oct →
ancient13–60.0111%8 Oct →
anubis13–80.0530%8 Oct →
anubis13–100.0118%7 Oct →
anubis13–110.0436%6 Oct →
ancient13–40.0734%6 Oct →
nuke7–130.0021%6 Oct →
nuke11–130.1123%5 Oct →
vertigo13–40.0819%5 Oct →
mirage13–90.0534%5 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0528%5 Oct →
ancient13–40.0425%5 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0236%5 Oct →
cache10–130.0829%5 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0515%5 Oct →
nuke13–80.0431%4 Oct →
nuke12–120.0237%4 Oct →
nuke12–120.0235%4 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0450%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.0528%4 Oct →
dust26–130.0744%4 Oct →
nuke13–50.0353%4 Oct →
train12–120.1145%4 Oct →
nuke11–130.0929%4 Oct →
nuke12–120.0427%3 Oct →
nuke2–130.0139%3 Oct →
nuke13–50.0333%3 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0914%3 Oct →
nuke13–100.0732%3 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0337%3 Oct →
nuke13–50.1929%3 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0124%2 Oct →
cache13–40.0433%2 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0037%2 Oct →
mirage13–50.0139%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.0322%28 Sept →
anubis0–2-0.030%28 Sept →
mirage7–130.0144%27 Sept →
nuke7–130.0324%27 Sept →
ancient9–130.0328%24 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0334%24 Sept →
ancient13–20.0139%24 Sept →
cache13–70.0335%24 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.