Skittsy not real

Skittsy not real — CS2 Stats

US76561198325023083[U:1:364757355]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,568Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,903Hours in CS44Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,031Purple band · top ~24.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 16,031 → 16,031
+4Tracked matches · now 2,568
−6.7ppWin rate · 73.3% → 66.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 17 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,031 +1,342 17 Aug17 Sept · 24 days played
12,73916,489peak 16,48917 Aug17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,038 +0 30 Aug1 Sept · 2 observations
1,0381,038peak 1,03830 Aug1 Sept
16,790Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,038Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 458 below peak (16,489)
  • +926 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,969 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.3%43.8%44.8%3.5% short
Shot accuracy7.1%12.0%12.4%5.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.021.040.03 short
Match win rate43.8%44.7%45.2%1.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSkittsy not realFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,031 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,038csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning78
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5446Last 10054%Win rateLLWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · +49ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility3.9
Positioning7.8
Opening Duels6.7
Clutch4.8

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning7.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels8.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time561ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · vertigo, 20 Sept
40%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 25 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 8 Sept
13–3Biggest win · vertigo, 20 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A24141058%0.05
mirageB1991047%-0.00
cacheS128467%0.03
infernoB115645%-0.01
ancientB115645%0.01
anubisB105550%0.02
nukeB84450%0.02
vertigo43175%0.04
office110100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,204Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
4,110Matches
43.8%Match win rate
41.3%Headshot %
7.1%Shot accuracy
8,431MVPs
1,510Hours (in match)
3,709Bombs planted
1,089Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,392
AWP8,348
SSG 082,892
MP92,115
Negev1,927
MAC-101,752

Lifetime map wins

8,288dust2
5,170inferno
3,265nuke
1,573vertigo
1,315train
536office
269cbble
207lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

95Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
83.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22752%1.0917.9
Mirage2454%0.9915.5
Inferno1354%1.0014.8
Cache967%1.0716.6
Vertigo683%1.3819.7
Nuke60%1.0215.8
Ancient333%1.1017.0
Anubis2100%1.6421.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
563msReaction time
63.4%T opening success
62.9%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
5.60HE damage / grenade
3.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4123 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0222%20 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0220%20 Sept
inferno13–70.1233%20 Sept
vertigo13–30.1920%20 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0315%15 Sept
inferno9–13-0.149%15 Sept
cache13–70.049%15 Sept
dust222–200.0613%15 Sept
dust213–100.0814%15 Sept
anubis13–90.0618%15 Sept
cache3–13-0.0320%14 Sept
dust213–60.1028%14 Sept
inferno9–130.0211%14 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0916%14 Sept
dust213–50.0719%14 Sept
mirage13–110.0714%14 Sept
dust213–70.0923%14 Sept
vertigo13–90.0416%14 Sept
dust213–90.0713%13 Sept
dust213–90.0716%13 Sept
inferno13–7-0.016%13 Sept
mirage10–130.0119%13 Sept
dust213–90.0524%13 Sept
dust213–90.0519%13 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0429%12 Sept
anubis13–100.018%12 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0514%12 Sept
inferno13–90.0216%12 Sept
nuke11–130.0719%11 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0012%11 Sept
dust213–10-0.0132%11 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0515%11 Sept
nuke16–130.0219%11 Sept
cache13–40.0416%11 Sept
mirage13–70.0115%10 Sept
dust28–13-0.018%10 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0311%10 Sept
dust26–130.0213%8 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.056%8 Sept
cache13–50.0818%8 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0213%8 Sept
mirage9–130.0317%7 Sept
dust213–40.1222%7 Sept
dust210–130.0218%7 Sept
anubis13–80.068%7 Sept
cache9–130.0819%7 Sept
mirage13–40.0510%6 Sept
ancient13–60.0918%6 Sept
cache13–100.0119%6 Sept
dust28–130.0326%6 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0221%5 Sept
mirage5–130.0318%5 Sept
dust213–110.1025%5 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0113%5 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0328%5 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0332%4 Sept
dust213–8-0.0318%4 Sept
anubis13–90.1420%4 Sept
nuke13–40.0510%4 Sept
ancient13–40.0231%4 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0111%4 Sept
anubis9–130.0127%4 Sept
nuke13–80.0119%4 Sept
mirage13–50.0811%3 Sept
ancient13–70.0420%3 Sept
office13–11-0.0717%3 Sept
mirage13–50.0113%3 Sept
dust24–130.0724%3 Sept
mirage1–10-0.0314%3 Sept
inferno13–80.0820%3 Sept
anubis13–8-0.0019%2 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0215%2 Sept
anubis9–130.0224%31 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0911%31 Aug
dust29–130.0923%31 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0326%31 Aug
ancient13–100.0319%30 Aug
mirage1–13-0.068%30 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0423%30 Aug
cache13–60.0323%30 Aug
cache13–80.0613%28 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0713%28 Aug
ancient11–130.0713%27 Aug
cache11–13-0.0216%27 Aug
dust23–13-0.0314%27 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0312%27 Aug
cache2–130.0140%25 Aug
dust210–130.0539%25 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0932%25 Aug
mirage13–30.0610%25 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0211%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.0123%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0735%24 Aug
cache13–5-0.0112%24 Aug
nuke5–130.0528%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0420%22 Aug
anubis14–160.0318%21 Aug
cache13–70.0513%18 Aug
dust213–70.1437%18 Aug
mirage13–80.0314%17 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →