Gwerp

Gwerp — CS2 Stats

CA76561198042086723[U:1:81820995]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,917Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,789Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,719Light Blue band · top ~70.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 6,719 → 6,719
+9Tracked matches · now 2,917
−9.4ppWin rate · 71.4% → 62.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 18 days played since 2 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,719 +210 4 Sept19 Sept · 15 days played
5,0007,693peak 7,6934 Sept19 Sept
7,693Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 974 below peak (7,693)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 3,281 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.9%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy15.3%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.021.040.08 short
Match win rate39.5%44.7%45.2%5.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGwerpFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER6,719 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning61
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49456Last 10049%Win rateLLWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −60ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility3.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 671ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning6.1
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time663ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 686ms → last ⅓ avg 663ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 7 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · mirage, 4 Sept
445msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 19 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8officeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22111150%-0.00
mirageB2091145%-0.03
cacheA1810856%0.00
ancientA85363%-0.02
anubisA85363%-0.01
infernoD62433%-0.05
nukeD62433%-0.05
officeD51420%0.00
vertigo330100%-0.03
fachwerk31233%0.05
train1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

151,485Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
7,326Matches
39.5%Match win rate
44.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
14,882MVPs
2,789Hours (in match)
7,553Bombs planted
1,699Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,224
AWP15,955
FAMAS3,290
P2502,730
MP92,458

Lifetime map wins

16,019dust2
7,555inferno
5,520nuke
1,745train
1,122cbble
988vertigo
803office
147lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

727Matches
48%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
79.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15052%0.9515.5
Dust214249%0.9415.1
Ancient7451%0.9915.2
Nuke6146%0.9916.3
Anubis5141%0.8415.1
Inferno3931%0.7313.2
Cache1573%0.9515.9
Overpass1450%0.9014.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
671msReaction time
60.9%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
11.18HE damage / grenade
3.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5917° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9824 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0619%20 Sept
dust29–13-0.0511%20 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.0410%20 Sept
ancient13–40.038%20 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.0119%19 Sept
ancient13–90.0415%19 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0515%19 Sept
ancient5–13-0.108%19 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0814%19 Sept
train4–13-0.0519%19 Sept
dust213–10-0.059%18 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0615%18 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0216%18 Sept
dust213–9-0.0012%18 Sept
cache13–80.0615%18 Sept
dust213–7-0.0523%18 Sept
anubis13–90.0510%18 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0125%18 Sept
fachwerk13–110.0614%18 Sept
cache13–7-0.0325%18 Sept
dust213–90.0526%18 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0515%17 Sept
anubis13–50.0313%17 Sept
office7–130.0620%17 Sept
cache10–13-0.0414%17 Sept
anubis13–50.0313%17 Sept
fachwerk10–130.0513%17 Sept
fachwerk12–120.0511%16 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0315%16 Sept
ancient13–90.0615%16 Sept
cache5–30.0313%16 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0411%15 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0415%15 Sept
dust215–15-0.0418%15 Sept
dust213–90.0214%15 Sept
cache13–9-0.0215%15 Sept
cache13–70.0413%15 Sept
dust222–200.0512%15 Sept
dust213–100.0414%15 Sept
anubis13–9-0.079%15 Sept
dust213–10-0.0120%14 Sept
cache9–13-0.057%14 Sept
nuke13–9-0.016%13 Sept
cache13–60.0717%13 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0215%13 Sept
dust211–13-0.0015%13 Sept
dust211–13-0.0621%13 Sept
cache13–50.1025%13 Sept
dust24–13-0.0314%12 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0016%12 Sept
dust213–100.0515%12 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0015%12 Sept
mirage8–13-0.025%12 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0516%12 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0713%11 Sept
cache13–5-0.0120%11 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0312%11 Sept
inferno5–13-0.1015%11 Sept
cache11–13-0.037%11 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0231%10 Sept
mirage13–80.0015%10 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0726%8 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0214%8 Sept
dust27–13-0.0711%8 Sept
office7–13-0.0132%8 Sept
anubis12–12-0.0121%8 Sept
cache10–130.0615%8 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0417%7 Sept
dust27–13-0.0414%7 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0712%7 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0212%7 Sept
dust213–40.1521%7 Sept
dust210–130.0514%7 Sept
nuke4–13-0.1021%6 Sept
cache7–130.0623%6 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0516%6 Sept
dust27–13-0.0415%6 Sept
cache3–13-0.0520%6 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0518%6 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0925%6 Sept
mirage13–40.0318%6 Sept
ancient13–6-0.067%6 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0313%6 Sept
dust26–13-0.0217%5 Sept
cache9–130.0113%5 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0432%5 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0016%4 Sept
mirage13–00.0450%4 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0611%4 Sept
dust213–80.0919%4 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0626%4 Sept
cache13–9-0.0319%4 Sept
dust211–13-0.0715%4 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0615%4 Sept
office13–11-0.0612%3 Sept
mirage13–5-0.014%3 Sept
mirage8–130.0117%3 Sept
office4–13-0.0414%3 Sept
office12–120.0626%2 Sept
cache13–9-0.0220%2 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →