lპმρɀ

lპმρɀ — CS2 Stats

76561198206126400[U:1:245860672]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,071Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,141Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,136Blue band · top ~38.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,136 -5,229 19 Jun – 26 Sept · 37 days played
10,87619,086peak 19,08619 Jun26 Sept
19,086Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-06-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,950 below peak (19,086)
  • +536 over 30 days · improving
  • -4,112 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,864 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,993), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.7%42.7%43.8%2.0% short
Shot accuracy11.6%11.3%12.0%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.900.991.020.12 short
Match win rate42.5%43.9%44.7%2.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlპმρɀFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,136 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning47
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–55–3Last 10042%Win rateWLLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility3.7
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.9

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.7
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time557ms−94ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 5 Jul →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · ancient, 11 Sept →
438msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 8 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–17In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 21% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD286–2221%-0.02
dust2B2210–1245%-0.01
infernoA1710–759%-0.01
anubisD113–827%-0.01
cacheA95–456%-0.01
ancientA85–363%-0.01
nukeA53–260%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 28). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,574Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
2,371Matches
42.5%Match win rate
41.7%Headshot %
11.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,104MVPs
933Hours (in match)
3,172Bombs planted
402Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,681dust2
3,709inferno
2,473nuke
606train
339vertigo
104cbble
36office
24lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

44Matches
57%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
—ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.1%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
554msReaction time
15.4%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
7.62HE damage / grenade
2.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.0535 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.4331% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.108%26 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0113%26 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0132%11 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0215%11 Sept →
cache8–130.0218%11 Sept →
nuke16–140.0117%11 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0220%10 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0211%10 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.067%10 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0215%8 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0212%8 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0715%8 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0124%7 Sept →
inferno13–40.0110%7 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0015%7 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0210%6 Sept →
mirage13–90.0019%6 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0617%5 Sept →
inferno11–130.0115%5 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.069%3 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0223%2 Sept →
mirage11–130.0314%2 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0119%2 Sept →
mirage14–160.0222%1 Sept →
mirage13–50.0123%1 Sept →
anubis13–20.0815%31 Aug →
mirage13–50.029%30 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0515%30 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0113%30 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0416%30 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0122%30 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0617%29 Aug →
inferno13–110.0026%29 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0618%29 Aug →
dust213–70.0119%28 Aug →
dust213–90.0516%28 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.092%28 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0223%28 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0415%27 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0416%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0114%27 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0114%26 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0514%26 Aug →
ancient13–110.0114%25 Aug →
dust213–70.0417%25 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0320%25 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.015%24 Aug →
ancient11–130.0110%21 Aug →
mirage10–130.0317%20 Aug →
dust213–10-0.008%18 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0226%17 Aug →
mirage13–100.0310%17 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0510%8 Aug →
anubis15–150.028%8 Aug →
inferno13–70.0817%7 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0514%6 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0418%5 Aug →
dust215–15-0.059%4 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0113%4 Aug →
dust29–130.0020%3 Aug →
nuke13–110.0618%2 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0224%2 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0617%2 Aug →
dust29–130.0222%29 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0519%29 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0223%27 Jul →
inferno13–20.0221%24 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.1219%23 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.048%23 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.068%22 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0311%22 Jul →
mirage14–160.089%20 Jul →
inferno12–16-0.077%19 Jul →
inferno11–130.0211%19 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.009%14 Jul →
cache5–13-0.070%14 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0211%14 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0713%14 Jul →
cache13–90.0412%12 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0215%12 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.1111%12 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0218%9 Jul →
cache6–130.0422%9 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0113%5 Jul →
anubis13–40.1318%5 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0313%5 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0211%5 Jul →
mirage8–130.0117%3 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0316%2 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.086%2 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.059%2 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0324%1 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0420%1 Jul →
inferno9–130.004%28 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0518%25 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0415%25 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0714%24 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0314%21 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0523%20 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0124%19 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.