dECKERS

dECKERS — CS2 Stats

GB76561198100018360[U:1:139752632]Steam profile ↗

3,276Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,404Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3657 of 33212 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,793 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdECKERSFACEITLevel 10 · 1,793 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,404 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning58
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39592Last 10039%Win rateWLWWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression6.4
Utility4.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.8
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time561ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–11
130Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B29141548%0.03
mirageD2561924%0.00
nukeD103730%0.00
ancientD103730%-0.01
cacheC94544%0.07
anubisS86275%0.02
infernoD51420%-0.00
fachwerk110100%0.03
office110100%0.12
vertigo1010%-0.05
poseidon1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,262Matches
51%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
82.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage32850%1.1216.1
Dust227650%1.1617.4
Ancient14550%1.0616.7
Nuke13856%1.4118.7
Inferno12452%1.1315.7
Anubis10852%1.2017.3
Train3549%1.2116.9
Overpass2157%1.1917.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
556msReaction time
27.0%T opening success
54.8%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
8.76HE damage / grenade
10.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4028 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.9968% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–40.0426%27 Aug
nuke27–310.0214%22 Aug
dust213–100.0026%18 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0221%18 Aug
mirage4–13-0.100%18 Aug
dust20–4-0.0375%18 Aug
mirage5–0-0.0118%18 Aug
cache9–13-0.0324%18 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0121%18 Aug
dust22–130.0429%18 Aug
mirage13–100.0717%16 Aug
dust213–110.0317%16 Aug
dust213–40.0136%14 Aug
dust27–130.0129%13 Aug
dust213–80.0330%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0434%12 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0232%11 Aug
dust210–130.0519%11 Aug
inferno5–130.0124%11 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0118%10 Aug
dust213–20.1035%10 Aug
dust26–130.0424%10 Aug
anubis13–90.0517%10 Aug
dust211–13-0.0138%9 Aug
dust213–70.0513%9 Aug
nuke13–90.0826%8 Aug
anubis13–50.0119%8 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0224%7 Aug
dust217–190.0018%6 Aug
mirage10–130.0330%6 Aug
dust26–130.0520%6 Aug
dust219–17-0.0223%6 Aug
nuke13–90.0229%6 Aug
dust27–130.0236%5 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0317%5 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0420%5 Aug
fachwerk13–10.0315%4 Aug
office8–10.1246%4 Aug
cache8–130.1229%4 Aug
nuke2–130.0422%4 Aug
cache13–110.1025%4 Aug
cache9–130.0731%4 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0316%3 Aug
mirage13–00.1029%3 Aug
dust213–50.0428%3 Aug
dust29–13-0.0228%3 Aug
cache6–130.0114%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0128%2 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0116%2 Aug
dust21–13-0.0426%2 Aug
ancient13–80.0212%2 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0727%1 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0530%1 Aug
cache13–40.0929%1 Aug
dust22–13-0.0125%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0417%30 Jul
ancient10–130.0226%30 Jul
mirage11–130.0224%30 Jul
dust213–110.1837%29 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0017%29 Jul
nuke9–130.0333%29 Jul
ancient13–110.0230%28 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0024%28 Jul
dust24–90.0524%28 Jul
mirage11–130.0212%27 Jul
dust213–60.1021%27 Jul
anubis13–70.0515%27 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1111%26 Jul
dust213–70.1021%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0611%26 Jul
nuke10–130.0316%26 Jul
cache10–130.0230%25 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0713%25 Jul
inferno8–130.0229%25 Jul
poseidon2–9-0.0818%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0211%24 Jul
mirage5–130.0721%23 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0617%23 Jul
mirage6–130.0627%22 Jul
anubis13–110.0627%22 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0422%22 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0322%22 Jul
mirage10–130.0325%21 Jul
dust213–20.0726%21 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0416%21 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0222%20 Jul
cache13–60.1023%19 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0535%19 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0121%18 Jul
cache13–30.1029%16 Jul
mirage10–130.0820%14 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0712%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0219%14 Jul
anubis13–90.0218%13 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0326%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0119%10 Jul
mirage5–30.0317%10 Jul
dust213–100.0018%10 Jul
dust29–13-0.0121%10 Jul
dust213–50.1142%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →