๐–“๐–‡๐–”

๐–“๐–‡๐–” โ€” CS2 Stats

76561199028008649[U:1:1067742921]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

388Tracked matches32%Win rate2022Tracked since
926Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,160Blue band ยท top ~32.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Aug 2026 (47 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,160 -2,719 13 Apr โ€“ 16 Aug ยท 28 days played
13,99919,999peak 19,99913 Apr16 Aug
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2025-04-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,839 below peak (19,999)
  • -1,354 over 30 days ยท declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 โ€” 840 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches1โ€”โ€”
Win rate0%โ€”โ€”
K/D0.39โ€”โ€”
Headshot %77%โ€”โ€”

Measured 2 Sep 2026 โ†’ 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile โ€” every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate51.4%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy11.9%12.2%11.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.780.980.990.22 short
Match win rate28.4%43.3%43.9%15.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐–“๐–‡๐–”FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER14,160 ยท Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning50
Utility31

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45โ€“52โ€“3Last 10045%Win rateLLWLWLTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate ยท +0.02 avg rating ยท +3.7pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’92ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2โ€“3 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 4โ€“5โ€“1 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 6โ€“12โ€“2 ยท 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility3.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 17% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.0
Utility3.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04โˆ’0.02
first โ…“ avg -0.02 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.04
Reaction time631msโˆ’36ms
first โ…“ avg 667ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%โˆ’0.1%
first โ…“ avg 22.0% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating ยท 13โ€“4 ยท nuke, 16 Apr โ†’
100%Best headshot accuracy ยท 13โ€“0 ยท dust2, 25 Jul โ†’
406msFastest reaction time ยท 2โ€“13 ยท mirage, 25 Jul โ†’
13โ€“0Biggest win ยท dust2, 25 Jul โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5โ€“5In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map ยท 80% over 5infernoWeakest map ยท 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2912โ€“1741%-0.03
dust2C156โ€“940%-0.02
infernoD134โ€“931%-0.05
nukeA138โ€“562%-0.01
ancientA95โ€“456%-0.02
cacheC83โ€“538%-0.04
anubisC83โ€“538%-0.03
trainS54โ€“180%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,611Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
1,615Matches
28.4%Match win rate
51.4%Headshot % ยท Top 25% of Level 3 players
11.9%Shot accuracy
2,060MVPs
926Hours (in match)
300Bombs planted
157Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,838dust2
1,335inferno
774nuke
368vertigo
115train
27lake
22cbble
20safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

89Matches
48%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
74.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2748%0.9615.3
Dust22148%0.8413.9
Anubis1040%0.8312.4
Ancient933%0.9513.1
Inferno743%0.7714.1
Cache650%0.8912.5
Nuke560%0.7612.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
29.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
8.9ยฐPreaim
638msReaction time
17.3%T opening success
57.8%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
6.57HE damage / grenade
3.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4869 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.3285% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2โ€“9-0.1350%21 Aug โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0314%16 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“5-0.0023%16 Aug โ†’
mirage14โ€“16-0.0021%16 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0521%16 Aug โ†’
ancient10โ€“130.0423%15 Aug โ†’
inferno8โ€“8-0.0610%14 Aug โ†’
inferno16โ€“14-0.0218%13 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“40.0629%12 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0530%12 Aug โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0315%11 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0416%11 Aug โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0311%5 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“9-0.0320%5 Aug โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.0718%5 Aug โ†’
dust215โ€“15-0.0129%4 Aug โ†’
cache9โ€“13-0.0724%4 Aug โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.1112%4 Aug โ†’
dust29โ€“130.0430%3 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0325%3 Aug โ†’
anubis10โ€“13-0.0419%3 Aug โ†’
cache1โ€“13-0.0656%3 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.0525%2 Aug โ†’
cache6โ€“13-0.0714%2 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0528%2 Aug โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0413%2 Aug โ†’
dust21โ€“13-0.1113%2 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“8-0.025%2 Aug โ†’
nuke7โ€“13-0.0234%1 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“9-0.0719%28 Jul โ†’
anubis15โ€“15-0.0512%28 Jul โ†’
inferno4โ€“130.0116%28 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“10-0.0533%27 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“8-0.0612%26 Jul โ†’
mirage2โ€“130.0223%25 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0021%25 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“00.02100%25 Jul โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0729%23 Jul โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0350%23 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0229%23 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“130.0127%23 Jul โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0617%22 Jul โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0014%22 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“10-0.0218%20 Jul โ†’
inferno12โ€“16-0.0038%19 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“50.0124%19 Jul โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0125%19 Jul โ†’
inferno2โ€“1-0.170%18 Jul โ†’
mirage16โ€“120.0122%18 Jul โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.0825%17 Jul โ†’
cache7โ€“13-0.0224%16 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0618%16 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“7-0.0717%14 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“30.0328%12 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0624%12 Jul โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.0736%12 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“11-0.0525%9 Jul โ†’
cache6โ€“13-0.0024%9 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.017%25 Jun โ†’
train2โ€“13-0.0511%21 Jun โ†’
train13โ€“100.0414%21 Jun โ†’
ancient7โ€“13-0.0012%20 Jun โ†’
mirage0โ€“9-0.0611%16 Jun โ†’
dust20โ€“13-0.0237%16 Jun โ†’
mirage10โ€“4-0.1214%9 Jun โ†’
train13โ€“60.0121%8 Jun โ†’
train13โ€“7-0.125%5 Jun โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0015%17 May โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.0421%21 Apr โ†’
mirage16โ€“13-0.0336%20 Apr โ†’
ancient5โ€“13-0.0433%20 Apr โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0318%20 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0615%20 Apr โ†’
nuke8โ€“130.0331%20 Apr โ†’
dust29โ€“13-0.0917%20 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“16-0.0516%18 Apr โ†’
nuke3โ€“13-0.0426%18 Apr โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0332%18 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0228%18 Apr โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.0518%17 Apr โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0118%17 Apr โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0113%16 Apr โ†’
anubis2โ€“13-0.0213%16 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0941%16 Apr โ†’
ancient16โ€“120.0214%16 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0212%16 Apr โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.0141%16 Apr โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0127%15 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“4-0.028%15 Apr โ†’
dust213โ€“20.0320%15 Apr โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.0331%15 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“2-0.0219%15 Apr โ†’
mirage13โ€“4-0.0516%14 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0119%14 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“30.049%14 Apr โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0424%14 Apr โ†’
dust213โ€“10-0.0523%13 Apr โ†’
nuke13โ€“2-0.0631%13 Apr โ†’
dust28โ€“13-0.0521%13 Apr โ†’
train13โ€“40.0422%13 Apr โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.