Creezer

Creezer — CS2 Stats

GB76561199435047224[U:1:1474781496]Steam profile ↗

2,319Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,142Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning51
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52435Last 10052%Win rateWLWLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression4.5
Utility3.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.1
Utility3.3
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time541ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — vertigo 9–5
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16dust2Weakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1611569%0.03
dust2C156940%-0.02
vertigoB115645%0.05
mirageA116555%0.01
cacheA116555%0.03
nukeB84450%0.01
infernoB63350%0.02
office42250%0.03
train440100%0.03
overpass32167%0.03
anubis2020%-0.02
poseidon21150%-0.06
fachwerk1010%0.05
shelter1010%-0.01
eldorado1010%-0.03
debris110100%0.16
boulder1010%-0.02
warden110100%0.04
italy1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

58,195Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,895Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
44.9%Headshot %
4.7%Shot accuracy
6,363MVPs
1,089Hours (in match)
3,678Bombs planted
694Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,047dust2
3,418inferno
3,036nuke
1,670vertigo
1,524train
166cbble
157lake
115office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

496Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
79.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10151%1.0315.4
Dust28754%1.0415.3
Nuke7659%1.0815.4
Inferno6344%1.1215.9
Ancient4941%1.0316.4
Anubis2945%1.0616.6
Train2752%1.1617.0
Vertigo1050%1.3018.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
560msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
11.03HE damage / grenade
1.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.433 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0738% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–11-0.0211%28 Aug
office9–130.0210%28 Aug
overpass13–20.1113%23 Aug
inferno4–13-0.1229%23 Aug
dust21–8-0.100%14 Aug
nuke13–100.0111%10 Aug
ancient13–80.0311%9 Aug
fachwerk11–130.0513%2 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0311%26 Jul
vertigo9–30.1017%25 Jul
shelter5–13-0.0113%25 Jul
dust213–1-0.0213%25 Jul
vertigo13–80.0420%22 Jul
eldorado7–9-0.0316%19 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0218%19 Jul
debris9–30.1624%19 Jul
cache3–13-0.0215%17 Jul
ancient5–130.0517%17 Jul
dust20–4-0.050%17 Jul
nuke0–10-0.047%17 Jul
dust213–90.0620%17 Jul
cache13–100.0824%12 Jul
ancient13–60.0117%12 Jul
mirage13–70.0920%12 Jul
boulder9–13-0.0217%11 Jul
vertigo9–50.179%5 Jul
ancient3–100.069%4 Jul
cache7–130.0629%2 Jul
vertigo1–60.0413%2 Jul
train13–80.0314%2 Jul
inferno13–70.0418%2 Jul
mirage7–130.0324%2 Jul
ancient13–60.0013%28 Jun
dust210–130.0118%28 Jun
train13–90.0915%28 Jun
office12–120.0723%28 Jun
overpass13–20.0411%28 Jun
vertigo9–30.138%28 Jun
nuke13–80.0415%27 Jun
mirage13–50.0220%27 Jun
cache13–4-0.009%27 Jun
train13–9-0.0112%27 Jun
nuke9–130.0527%24 Jun
mirage13–80.0313%24 Jun
anubis8–130.017%22 Jun
ancient7–13-0.044%21 Jun
dust26–13-0.0413%21 Jun
cache12–12-0.0318%21 Jun
ancient12–120.1215%21 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0517%21 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0218%21 Jun
office13–9-0.0119%19 Jun
dust26–13-0.0114%19 Jun
ancient13–80.0519%19 Jun
warden13–110.0423%18 Jun
italy12–12-0.0216%16 Jun
inferno7–130.038%14 Jun
vertigo6–130.0215%14 Jun
cache9–00.0713%14 Jun
cache13–30.0924%14 Jun
ancient13–90.046%14 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0113%14 Jun
nuke13–110.0914%13 Jun
dust22–8-0.0313%13 Jun
dust213–40.0521%13 Jun
cache13–40.0512%13 Jun
mirage8–130.0926%13 Jun
ancient13–40.0613%11 Jun
office13–50.0529%11 Jun
vertigo4–60.0417%10 Jun
dust23–20.0767%10 Jun
ancient13–20.1025%10 Jun
cache4–13-0.0312%10 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0414%5 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0511%5 Jun
cache13–60.0114%3 Jun
ancient13–90.0214%31 May
ancient16–12-0.0410%31 May
dust216–13-0.0110%31 May
vertigo7–90.0228%31 May
inferno13–110.1320%29 May
inferno13–50.0326%29 May
ancient16–120.017%29 May
vertigo8–8-0.028%29 May
inferno9–130.0018%29 May
vertigo2–9-0.0532%29 May
ancient10–130.0213%29 May
vertigo9–10.0625%29 May
mirage6–13-0.0417%29 May
mirage13–11-0.0511%29 May
dust28–13-0.0415%29 May
nuke13–40.0026%29 May
mirage7–13-0.0714%27 May
poseidon9–2-0.046%27 May
dust213–100.018%26 May
train13–50.0120%26 May
poseidon6–9-0.0919%25 May
cache7–130.0218%25 May
dust22–13-0.0911%24 May
mirage16–13-0.016%24 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →