Tuksutin

Tuksutin — CS2 Stats

FI76561197994420851[U:1:34155123]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,928Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,795Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#46547 of 251275 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,607 +185 11 Apr – 10 May · 12 days played
22,20623,514peak 23,51411 Apr10 May
23,876Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,069Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-04-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,069
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 431 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTuksutinPEAK ELO2,069csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning64
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–50–7Last 10043%Win rateTLWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 7%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time560ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 9–1 · sanctum, 24 Apr →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · poseidon, 10 May →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · anubis, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 17 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
poseidonC145–936%-0.02
ancientA138–562%0.01
anubisC125–742%0.02
infernoD113–827%-0.01
sanctumD93–633%-0.04
nukeA85–363%0.02
dust2S75–271%0.02
cacheD72–529%0.01
overpassB63–350%0.03
vertigo—30–30%0.01
mirage—21–150%0.01
warden—20–20%-0.05
eldorado—11–0100%0.03
debris—11–0100%0.04
fachwerk—10–10%-0.02
stronghold—10–10%0.02
alpine—11–0100%-0.00
italy—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

103,402Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
5,681Matches
44.6%Match win rate
44.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
11.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
14,240MVPs
2,827Hours (in match)
4,291Bombs planted
1,372Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,506
AWP8,882
MAC-102,835
MP92,652
P2501,427

Lifetime map wins

9,330dust2
6,125inferno
4,232nuke
3,301train
2,011vertigo
947cbble
801office
282italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

559Matches
56%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
92.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27446%1.2618.7
Nuke6763%1.5119.6
Inferno6568%1.4219.1
Ancient6452%1.3719.0
Anubis6263%1.4719.3
Mirage3540%1.2519.4
Vertigo2450%1.3418.1
Overpass1650%1.4219.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
540msReaction time
47.2%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
12.30HE damage / grenade
5.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon8–8-0.0110%4 Oct →
poseidon0–9-0.230%4 Oct →
eldorado9–70.038%4 Oct →
debris9–40.046%4 Oct →
anubis9–130.0114%3 Oct →
dust213–80.0811%3 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.054%3 Oct →
anubis10–130.0821%3 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0017%3 Oct →
anubis13–20.0918%3 Oct →
dust213–110.0410%2 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0311%2 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0512%1 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0020%1 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.098%1 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0112%1 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0216%30 Sept →
fachwerk9–13-0.0219%30 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0511%10 May →
ancient13–90.0013%10 May →
poseidon7–90.0515%10 May →
vertigo4–9-0.0132%10 May →
poseidon9–60.1333%10 May →
sanctum5–9-0.0715%10 May →
poseidon4–9-0.0527%10 May →
anubis13–30.0915%9 May →
cache7–13-0.0316%9 May →
cache9–130.0322%9 May →
cache13–10.0617%9 May →
sanctum2–9-0.1721%9 May →
poseidon9–50.1233%9 May →
dust213–70.0112%7 May →
inferno8–13-0.0422%7 May →
nuke13–110.0625%7 May →
nuke11–13-0.0021%4 May →
anubis16–140.0411%4 May →
ancient13–20.0621%4 May →
inferno9–13-0.0024%4 May →
nuke13–70.1112%3 May →
poseidon8–8-0.0714%3 May →
sanctum7–90.0416%3 May →
poseidon4–9-0.1513%3 May →
ancient6–13-0.0723%2 May →
anubis6–13-0.0619%2 May →
cache8–13-0.0215%2 May →
cache8–13-0.035%2 May →
overpass15–15-0.0413%1 May →
ancient14–160.0110%1 May →
dust26–13-0.0216%1 May →
inferno13–5-0.0311%1 May →
anubis7–13-0.0419%1 May →
inferno11–130.0215%1 May →
nuke15–15-0.0213%30 Apr →
overpass13–30.0223%30 Apr →
cache10–130.0728%30 Apr →
overpass13–30.056%26 Apr →
nuke13–60.0018%26 Apr →
vertigo2–13-0.039%24 Apr →
stronghold5–130.0216%24 Apr →
alpine13–10-0.0016%24 Apr →
vertigo8–80.0619%24 Apr →
sanctum1–9-0.2025%24 Apr →
poseidon9–7-0.0129%24 Apr →
sanctum9–10.3112%24 Apr →
poseidon9–60.1716%24 Apr →
sanctum9–5-0.0129%24 Apr →
poseidon3–9-0.1620%24 Apr →
ancient13–40.0911%19 Apr →
inferno13–6-0.037%19 Apr →
ancient13–80.0918%19 Apr →
sanctum1–9-0.2413%18 Apr →
poseidon5–9-0.0619%18 Apr →
sanctum6–9-0.0319%18 Apr →
poseidon3–9-0.088%18 Apr →
sanctum9–40.008%18 Apr →
poseidon9–70.0113%18 Apr →
warden12–12-0.0223%17 Apr →
anubis13–00.0515%17 Apr →
nuke10–130.0115%17 Apr →
overpass6–13-0.0113%17 Apr →
ancient13–100.0512%17 Apr →
ancient13–60.0917%17 Apr →
anubis13–70.1111%16 Apr →
overpass6–130.0519%16 Apr →
inferno11–130.0120%16 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0722%16 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0213%16 Apr →
dust213–60.0619%16 Apr →
warden11–13-0.098%14 Apr →
italy7–13-0.0813%14 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.025%14 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.039%14 Apr →
nuke16–130.0112%14 Apr →
inferno13–20.0525%14 Apr →
ancient13–90.0313%12 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0316%12 Apr →
overpass13–100.1031%12 Apr →
inferno13–16-0.0226%11 Apr →
mirage13–90.0316%11 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0015%11 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.