Turkulainen Nokkaketju

Turkulainen Nokkaketju — CS2 Stats

AX76561197986020898[U:1:25755170]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,028Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,678Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,873Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#45135 of 260005 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,834 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,873 +4,698 3 Aug – 4 Nov · 43 days played
18,17523,052peak 23,0523 Aug4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,834 +0 1 Sept – 2 Oct · 9 observations
1,8341,834peak 1,8341 Sept2 Oct
23,052Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,834Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,834
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 167 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 179 below peak (23,052)
  • +1,221 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,951 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,127 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches9049+41
Win rate58%49%+9pp
K/D1.341.30+0.04
Headshot %47%50%−3pp

Measured 2 Oct 2026 → 5 Nov 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate53.0%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy10.8%13.2%13.7%2.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.281.071.09above
Match win rate52.4%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTurkulainen NokkaketjuFACEITLevel 9 · 1,834 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,873 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,834csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning73
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–40–3Last 10057%Win rateLLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.7
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 45% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning7.3
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time559ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 25 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 6 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 12 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L3Current streak
12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18mirageWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2214–864%0.02
ancientA2011–955%0.02
nukeS1813–572%0.04
infernoC146–843%0.03
dust2A127–558%0.01
mirageD93–633%0.02
cacheA53–260%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

93,688Lifetime kills
1.28K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
3,670Matches
52.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
53.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
10.8%Shot accuracy
11,170MVPs
1,678Hours (in match)
5,706Bombs planted
1,220Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,089
MP95,370
AWP4,519
FAMAS2,521
MAC-101,904

Lifetime map wins

5,964inferno
5,884nuke
3,946dust2
3,007vertigo
1,746train
548lake
489safehouse
372bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

520Matches
55%Win rate
1.36Avg K/D
88.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7753%1.4718.8
Anubis6748%1.2617.1
Nuke4657%1.4318.3
Mirage4443%1.2317.6
Inferno4365%1.5719.3
Dust23944%1.3118.6
Overpass2357%1.4819.4
Vertigo250%0.9414.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
561msReaction time
63.0%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
8.47HE damage / grenade
10.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4797 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–130.0613%4 Nov →
anubis4–13-0.0829%1 Nov →
dust29–130.0623%1 Nov →
mirage13–90.0026%31 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0021%31 Oct →
inferno10–130.0412%31 Oct →
mirage7–130.0224%31 Oct →
ancient13–90.0828%29 Oct →
anubis13–70.0212%29 Oct →
dust213–110.0423%29 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0112%28 Oct →
ancient11–130.0411%26 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0416%26 Oct →
ancient6–130.0414%22 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0022%22 Oct →
ancient13–70.0923%22 Oct →
dust213–100.0117%21 Oct →
dust213–80.0017%21 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0213%20 Oct →
dust23–130.0120%20 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0414%19 Oct →
inferno10–130.0123%18 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0220%18 Oct →
dust213–80.0319%12 Oct →
anubis13–50.0110%12 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0435%11 Oct →
nuke13–50.0921%11 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0114%10 Oct →
anubis13–90.0515%10 Oct →
mirage16–130.0525%10 Oct →
ancient16–130.0418%9 Oct →
nuke10–130.0020%8 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0217%7 Oct →
mirage9–130.0013%7 Oct →
nuke13–50.0111%7 Oct →
mirage4–130.0319%7 Oct →
ancient13–110.0416%6 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0133%4 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0217%3 Oct →
inferno13–100.0316%3 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0115%2 Oct →
mirage13–60.037%2 Oct →
nuke4–00.019%2 Oct →
cache13–110.0523%2 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0428%1 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0413%1 Oct →
nuke11–130.0122%28 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0419%28 Sept →
dust213–100.0214%28 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0315%26 Sept →
inferno13–50.1028%26 Sept →
dust24–13-0.019%26 Sept →
anubis10–130.0216%26 Sept →
nuke13–110.1618%25 Sept →
inferno13–90.1013%25 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0112%22 Sept →
inferno11–130.0219%22 Sept →
ancient10–130.0410%22 Sept →
anubis13–160.0117%22 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0218%21 Sept →
dust213–110.0133%21 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0416%19 Sept →
nuke13–20.0720%19 Sept →
ancient13–110.0221%18 Sept →
cache4–50.1521%17 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0322%17 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0220%13 Sept →
inferno15–150.1126%10 Sept →
anubis6–130.0729%10 Sept →
anubis13–100.0124%9 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0423%9 Sept →
nuke13–10.1040%6 Sept →
anubis8–130.0621%3 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0122%2 Sept →
nuke13–90.0337%2 Sept →
anubis13–50.0629%2 Sept →
inferno13–90.0310%31 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0117%23 Aug →
anubis13–60.1225%23 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0418%20 Aug →
nuke13–160.0116%17 Aug →
ancient13–110.0520%17 Aug →
inferno13–50.1021%16 Aug →
dust213–50.0310%16 Aug →
nuke8–130.0015%14 Aug →
ancient8–130.0321%14 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0119%13 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0213%13 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0326%12 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0025%12 Aug →
ancient13–100.0029%11 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0218%10 Aug →
nuke13–90.0617%10 Aug →
ancient13–30.0421%10 Aug →
nuke13–60.0439%9 Aug →
anubis13–60.0729%9 Aug →
nuke13–100.0617%6 Aug →
nuke13–40.0726%6 Aug →
inferno8–130.0323%3 Aug →
anubis13–10.1026%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.