meissi

meissi — CS2 Stats

EE76561198034990288[U:1:74724560]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

649Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,594Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82674 of 232082 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,064 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 18 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,594 +1,311 18 Mar19 Sept · 29 days played
13,23019,595peak 19,59518 Mar19 Sept
19,595Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,064Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-03-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,064
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 137 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 1 below peak (19,595)
  • +1,078 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,987 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 406 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmeissiFACEITLevel 4 · 1,064 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,594 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,064csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning53
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46531Last 10046%Win rateWWLLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time571ms−116ms
first ⅓ avg 686ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 4–0 · cache, 29 Apr
37%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 18 Sept
398msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 15 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 19dust2Weakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA1911858%-0.02
dust2D1851328%-0.03
cacheB158753%0.02
infernoC135838%-0.01
ancientC135838%-0.02
nukeA127558%-0.02
mirageD72529%-0.00
overpass220100%-0.01
office110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
53%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
65.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1464%0.8310.4
Nuke1354%0.9912.5
Ancient1267%0.8712.8
Dust21233%0.7912.3
Mirage933%0.8012.4
Overpass838%1.0320.0
Inferno5100%0.588.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
574msReaction time
38.8%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.78HE damage / grenade
4.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.8271% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–130.0226%19 Sept
nuke13–2-0.019%19 Sept
inferno4–130.0137%18 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0521%13 Sept
cache13–6-0.029%7 Sept
inferno4–130.0311%7 Sept
nuke13–10.0123%6 Sept
dust29–13-0.079%2 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0316%2 Sept
dust29–130.0320%2 Sept
cache16–13-0.0120%2 Sept
cache13–40.039%2 Sept
dust27–13-0.0313%1 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0320%1 Sept
anubis7–13-0.088%30 Aug
anubis13–30.0229%27 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0313%24 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0220%23 Aug
nuke7–130.0221%20 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0311%17 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0027%17 Aug
mirage8–130.0414%17 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0415%15 Aug
ancient7–13-0.085%15 Aug
inferno11–13-0.077%15 Aug
anubis13–110.0011%13 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0413%13 Aug
cache7–13-0.0112%11 Aug
dust216–12-0.0025%11 Aug
anubis13–7-0.049%10 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0315%10 Aug
ancient13–30.0411%10 Aug
nuke13–60.017%9 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0310%9 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0212%3 Aug
anubis13–10.0222%3 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0717%3 Aug
dust213–90.0121%18 Jul
cache13–60.0710%18 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0317%18 Jul
nuke5–13-0.1013%9 Jul
dust29–13-0.096%3 Jul
anubis8–13-0.065%3 Jul
cache13–50.0621%1 Jul
dust215–150.016%1 Jul
inferno10–130.009%1 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0118%1 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0213%29 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0311%29 Jun
mirage10–130.0129%28 Jun
dust210–13-0.0216%28 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0718%27 May
cache13–7-0.0016%27 May
ancient13–10-0.0110%27 May
ancient3–13-0.0113%22 May
mirage14–160.0713%22 May
nuke14–16-0.0326%22 May
inferno16–120.0511%22 May
cache6–13-0.009%14 May
dust28–13-0.0510%14 May
office13–90.0415%14 May
anubis7–13-0.0413%8 May
inferno10–13-0.0223%8 May
ancient6–13-0.0010%8 May
cache10–130.0224%7 May
dust213–80.0320%6 May
cache11–130.0424%6 May
overpass13–60.0119%5 May
cache8–13-0.0321%5 May
cache1–13-0.0817%5 May
cache13–50.0427%29 Apr
cache2–130.0622%29 Apr
cache4–00.1314%29 Apr
dust29–13-0.0519%28 Apr
ancient11–130.0018%28 Apr
mirage13–70.0224%23 Apr
dust213–70.018%23 Apr
anubis13–30.054%8 Apr
overpass13–5-0.048%8 Apr
dust26–13-0.0514%8 Apr
nuke9–130.0517%6 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0013%6 Apr
inferno13–100.0417%6 Apr
dust27–13-0.0618%5 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0218%5 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0120%5 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0211%5 Apr
inferno16–13-0.0213%5 Apr
dust27–13-0.0313%29 Mar
dust29–13-0.0317%29 Mar
dust21–9-0.0129%26 Mar
dust213–7-0.0622%26 Mar
mirage8–13-0.088%24 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0518%24 Mar
inferno13–6-0.097%22 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0312%22 Mar
anubis13–100.089%21 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0718%21 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0811%21 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0321%18 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →