meissi

meissi — CS2 Stats

EE76561198034990288[U:1:74724560]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

658Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,501Top 50% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#89521 of 251391 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,501 → 19,501
+5Tracked matches · now 658
+3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,501 +2,423 26 Mar – 25 Sept · 28 days played
13,23019,595peak 19,59526 Mar25 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,064 +0 15 Sept – 25 Sept · 3 observations
1,0641,064peak 1,06415 Sept25 Sept
19,800Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,064Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-03-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 94 below peak (19,595)
  • +985 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,894 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 499 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmeissiFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,501 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,064csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning53
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateWLWWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time576ms−133ms
first ⅓ avg 709ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 4–0 · cache, 29 Apr →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 18 Sept →
398msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 15 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 19dust2Weakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D206–1430%-0.02
anubisA1912–763%-0.02
cacheB158–753%0.02
infernoC135–838%-0.01
ancientC125–742%-0.02
nukeA127–558%-0.02
mirageB63–350%0.01
overpass—22–0100%-0.01
office—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

80Matches
55%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
64.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1669%0.7910.1
Ancient1362%0.8212.1
Nuke1354%0.9912.5
Dust21233%0.7912.3
Mirage1040%0.8012.7
Overpass838%1.0320.0
Inferno888%0.629.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
587msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
12.57HE damage / grenade
4.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6759% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–8-0.0118%11 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.050%11 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0112%10 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0621%10 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0420%10 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.079%21 Sept →
dust213–110.0416%21 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0129%20 Sept →
anubis16–130.0226%19 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.019%19 Sept →
inferno4–130.0137%18 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0521%13 Sept →
cache13–6-0.029%7 Sept →
inferno4–130.0311%7 Sept →
nuke13–10.0123%6 Sept →
dust29–13-0.079%2 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0316%2 Sept →
dust29–130.0320%2 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0120%2 Sept →
cache13–40.039%2 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0313%1 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0320%1 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.088%30 Aug →
anubis13–30.0229%27 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0313%24 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0220%23 Aug →
nuke7–130.0221%20 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0311%17 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0027%17 Aug →
mirage8–130.0414%17 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0415%15 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.085%15 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.077%15 Aug →
anubis13–110.0011%13 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0413%13 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0112%11 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0025%11 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.049%10 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0315%10 Aug →
ancient13–30.0411%10 Aug →
nuke13–60.017%9 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0310%9 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0212%3 Aug →
anubis13–10.0222%3 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0717%3 Aug →
dust213–90.0121%18 Jul →
cache13–60.0710%18 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0317%18 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.1013%9 Jul →
dust29–13-0.096%3 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.065%3 Jul →
cache13–50.0621%1 Jul →
dust215–150.016%1 Jul →
inferno10–130.009%1 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0118%1 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0213%29 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0311%29 Jun →
mirage10–130.0129%28 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0216%28 Jun →
anubis13–9-0.0718%27 May →
cache13–7-0.0016%27 May →
ancient13–10-0.0110%27 May →
ancient3–13-0.0113%22 May →
mirage14–160.0713%22 May →
nuke14–16-0.0326%22 May →
inferno16–120.0511%22 May →
cache6–13-0.009%14 May →
dust28–13-0.0510%14 May →
office13–90.0415%14 May →
anubis7–13-0.0413%8 May →
inferno10–13-0.0223%8 May →
ancient6–13-0.0010%8 May →
cache10–130.0224%7 May →
dust213–80.0320%6 May →
cache11–130.0424%6 May →
overpass13–60.0119%5 May →
cache8–13-0.0321%5 May →
cache1–13-0.0817%5 May →
cache13–50.0427%29 Apr →
cache2–130.0622%29 Apr →
cache4–00.1314%29 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0519%28 Apr →
ancient11–130.0018%28 Apr →
mirage13–70.0224%23 Apr →
dust213–70.018%23 Apr →
anubis13–30.054%8 Apr →
overpass13–5-0.048%8 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0514%8 Apr →
nuke9–130.0517%6 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.0013%6 Apr →
inferno13–100.0417%6 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0618%5 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.0218%5 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0120%5 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0211%5 Apr →
inferno16–13-0.0213%5 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0313%29 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0317%29 Mar →
dust21–9-0.0129%26 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0622%26 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.