☆𝓑𝓛𝓔𝓔𝓚☆ — CS2 Stats

DE76561197982497431[U:1:22231703]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,361Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,601Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating14,729Blue band · top ~29.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#151696 of 259059 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,729 -1,154 5 Aug – 26 Oct · 31 days played

16,209Peak Premier in tracked matches

33Days played since 2026-08-05

Premier CS Rating

1,154 below peak (15,883)
+400 over 30 days · steady
-1,154 over 90 days
Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 271 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	47.2%	41.8%	42.7%	above
Shot accuracy	0.2%	12.2%	11.2%	11.1% short
Kill/death ratio	1.13	0.98	0.99	above
Match win rate	48.7%	43.3%	43.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning65

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateWWWLLLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

5–4–1 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

12–7–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.4

Utility6.6

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels5.0

Clutch7.8

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 69% on T to 51% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning6.5

Utility6.6

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels7.6

Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time586ms−2ms

first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms

Headshot accuracy16.7%−2.7%

first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 23 Oct →

38%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 9 Aug →

438msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · nuke, 9 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 20 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	23	11–12	48%	-0.00
inferno	B	20	10–10	50%	0.04
dust2	C	19	7–12	37%	0.02
anubis	C	11	4–7	36%	0.02
ancient	B	10	5–5	50%	0.02
mirage	D	9	2–7	22%	0.02
cache	S	5	5–0	100%	0.07
vertigo	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,343Lifetime kills

1.13K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players

2,311Matches

48.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players

47.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players

0.2%Shot accuracy

5,301MVPs

850Hours (in match)

2,336Bombs planted

692Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,666

M4A4 / M4A1-S9,080

AWP2,346

Galil AR2,268

SSG 081,600

P2000 / USP-S1,545

Desert Eagle1,515

MP91,230

Glock-181,209

P901,064

Lifetime map wins

4,932inferno

4,559dust2

4,292nuke

1,476vertigo

268train

74office

17italy

8assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

34Matches

47%Win rate

0.88Avg K/D

70.1ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

59%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	7	57%	0.83	11.0
Dust2	7	43%	0.90	11.1
Mirage	6	50%	0.78	12.3
Nuke	4	50%	1.26	19.8
Anubis	4	25%	0.88	10.8
Ancient	3	67%	0.76	13.7
Cache	2	50%	0.66	14.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.94	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy

38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.7%Spray accuracy

76.4%Counter-strafing

12.4°Preaim

588msReaction time

69.0%T opening success

51.5%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

7.1%Flash assists

10.86HE damage / grenade

9.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.3541° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	16–12	0.03	15%	26 Oct →
inferno	16–14	-0.02	16%	25 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.09	21%	25 Oct →
nuke	7–13	0.03	25%	25 Oct →
anubis	5–13	0.01	14%	23 Oct →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	10%	23 Oct →
nuke	15–15	0.02	14%	23 Oct →
anubis	13–9	0.15	14%	23 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	18%	20 Oct →
cache	13–0	0.07	13%	20 Oct →
nuke	13–8	-0.07	8%	20 Oct →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	22%	20 Oct →
cache	7–3	0.12	36%	20 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	15%	20 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.01	11%	20 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.01	12%	19 Oct →
dust2	13–3	-0.06	13%	19 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.03	17%	19 Oct →
nuke	13–11	0.03	10%	19 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	23%	19 Oct →
nuke	13–2	0.12	9%	19 Oct →
anubis	7–13	0.05	16%	19 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.13	17%	19 Oct →
cache	13–2	0.04	23%	18 Oct →
inferno	15–15	0.08	15%	18 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.08	18%	18 Oct →
dust2	15–15	0.00	14%	18 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.03	21%	8 Oct →
nuke	8–13	0.04	19%	8 Oct →
inferno	6–13	0.05	13%	8 Oct →
inferno	13–8	0.08	36%	8 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.07	13%	5 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.00	13%	5 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.09	27%	5 Oct →
nuke	6–0	-0.06	14%	5 Oct →
ancient	13–16	-0.00	23%	30 Sept →
mirage	14–16	0.01	13%	30 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.00	24%	25 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.04	12%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.12	13%	25 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.03	15%	19 Sept →
nuke	3–13	-0.10	9%	18 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.04	12%	18 Sept →
anubis	13–2	-0.03	6%	18 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	9%	16 Sept →
ancient	11–13	0.02	16%	14 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	5%	14 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	17%	14 Sept →
dust2	3–13	0.00	23%	13 Sept →
anubis	5–13	0.05	23%	13 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	17%	12 Sept →
inferno	12–16	-0.00	14%	12 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.04	13%	12 Sept →
inferno	13–7	0.10	21%	12 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.01	13%	11 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	36%	11 Sept →
inferno	13–3	0.07	27%	11 Sept →
inferno	9–6	0.02	24%	11 Sept →
inferno	4–13	0.07	19%	11 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.03	8%	10 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.08	20%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–8	0.03	15%	10 Sept →
ancient	16–13	0.04	19%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.08	18%	9 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.12	24%	9 Sept →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	12%	9 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	7%	4 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.13	17%	4 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.07	8%	4 Sept →
vertigo	6–13	-0.05	18%	3 Sept →
nuke	12–12	-0.03	17%	3 Sept →
nuke	3–9	-0.08	19%	3 Sept →
inferno	9–2	0.12	23%	3 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.09	20%	2 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.04	19%	2 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.03	10%	2 Sept →
ancient	5–13	0.02	34%	20 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	10%	20 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	14%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	19%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.05	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	17%	19 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	12%	18 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.06	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	12%	17 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	17%	17 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	16%	14 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	23%	14 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	-0.01	24%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	20%	10 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	38%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	14%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	30%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	35%	9 Aug →
nuke	12–6	-0.00	21%	9 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.01	20%	8 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.03	23%	8 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	11%	6 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	23%	5 Aug →