.TRiP.#' 🖏 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198433750949[U:1:473485221]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,541Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating8,909Light Blue band · top ~60.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#190418 of 259055 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−267Premier CS Rating · 9,176 → 8,909

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,909 +3,808 14 Aug – 31 Oct · 39 days played

11,097Peak Premier in tracked matches

38Days played since 2026-08-14

Premier CS Rating

1,944 below peak (10,853)
-665 over 30 days · declining
+3,808 over 90 days
Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,091 to go
Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning61

Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–43–9Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 20%
Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

9–9–2 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6

Utility7.6

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels3.7

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 71% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning6.1

Utility7.6

Mechanics5.5

Opening Duels6.0

Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time603ms−15ms

first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms

Headshot accuracy19.8%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 20 Oct →

39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 24 Oct →

391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 18 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 20 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

7–1In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

18Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.00
dust2	C	18	7–11	39%	0.02
cache	S	17	11–6	65%	0.02
mirage	B	15	7–8	47%	0.01
nuke	B	12	6–6	50%	0.03
ancient	B	11	5–6	45%	0.01
anubis	D	8	2–6	25%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.3%Spray accuracy

74.9%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

593msReaction time

70.6%T opening success

38.0%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

6.0%Flash assists

13.54HE damage / grenade

14.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 38.04% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	10–13	0.03	13%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.00	22%	31 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	7%	31 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.02	33%	30 Oct →
anubis	12–16	0.00	24%	30 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.09	7%	30 Oct →
mirage	7–13	0.04	23%	29 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	14%	29 Oct →
mirage	13–9	0.03	17%	29 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.05	14%	29 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	14%	29 Oct →
anubis	16–13	0.09	15%	29 Oct →
inferno	13–6	0.01	32%	29 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	14%	29 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.04	17%	29 Oct →
nuke	12–16	0.02	19%	29 Oct →
cache	15–15	0.02	13%	28 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	18%	27 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.04	39%	24 Oct →
anubis	15–15	0.00	20%	24 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	10%	23 Oct →
inferno	16–13	-0.03	14%	22 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	18%	22 Oct →
nuke	15–15	0.06	16%	22 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.11	25%	22 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.02	10%	21 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.00	24%	21 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	25%	21 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	32%	20 Oct →
cache	13–0	0.08	29%	20 Oct →
nuke	13–8	0.15	26%	20 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	29%	20 Oct →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	17%	20 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.05	37%	19 Oct →
cache	13–2	0.05	20%	18 Oct →
inferno	15–15	-0.06	14%	18 Oct →
cache	13–8	-0.04	10%	18 Oct →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	23%	18 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.01	30%	17 Oct →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	13%	17 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.02	9%	17 Oct →
inferno	4–13	0.02	7%	16 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.09	11%	16 Oct →
dust2	9–13	0.12	21%	16 Oct →
ancient	13–11	0.03	14%	16 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.13	19%	16 Oct →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	9%	16 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.04	20%	16 Oct →
cache	9–13	0.04	21%	12 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.04	14%	12 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.02	14%	10 Oct →
cache	13–7	0.01	10%	10 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	25%	2 Oct →
anubis	13–7	0.01	10%	2 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.10	20%	2 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	13%	2 Oct →
cache	15–15	-0.06	15%	1 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.04	17%	28 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.04	29%	23 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	10%	23 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	0%	21 Sept →
nuke	7–13	0.11	9%	21 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.03	21%	19 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	16%	18 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.05	12%	18 Sept →
inferno	13–4	0.07	32%	18 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.03	24%	18 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.00	13%	18 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.10	18%	15 Sept →
dust2	6–13	0.05	18%	14 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	17%	13 Sept →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	27%	13 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	30%	13 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	19%	13 Sept →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	15%	12 Sept →
cache	13–9	0.01	10%	12 Sept →
inferno	15–15	0.01	7%	9 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	15%	2 Sept →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	22%	30 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.10	17%	30 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	19%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	16%	26 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	17%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	22%	22 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.04	23%	22 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.02	26%	22 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.02	26%	22 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.05	21%	18 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.04	35%	18 Aug →
inferno	7–1	-0.03	25%	18 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.01	15%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.02	19%	18 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.03	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.00	17%	18 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.04	19%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.06	26%	17 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.08	33%	16 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.03	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	18%	14 Aug →