apoLLo|FEAR©

apoLLo|FEAR© — CS2 Stats

DE76561198022135388[U:1:61869660]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,751Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,528Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating5,442Light Blue band · top ~76.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,442 -595 29 Aug – 29 Oct · 32 days played
4,5956,850peak 6,85029 Aug29 Oct
7,100Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,408 below peak (6,850)
  • -12 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 4,558 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate38.2%43.8%44.8%6.6% short
Shot accuracy6.2%12.0%12.4%6.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.861.021.030.18 short
Match win rate41.0%44.7%45.2%4.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGapoLLo|FEAR©FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER5,442 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning55
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT44–51–5Last 10044%Win rateWLLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim4.3
Utility5.9
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch9.4

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 55% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 692ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning5.5
Utility5.9
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact7.4

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time693ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 693ms
Headshot accuracy13.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 28 Sept →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · inferno, 28 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–3 · inferno, 29 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2210–1245%0.00
nukeC167–944%-0.00
infernoC166–1038%-0.02
mirageB168–850%-0.00
anubisD124–833%-0.02
ancientA95–456%-0.02
cacheA74–357%0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.13
overpass—10–10%-0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,423Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
4,683Matches
41.0%Match win rate
38.2%Headshot %
6.2%Shot accuracy
5,915MVPs
1,528Hours (in match)
4,288Bombs planted
658Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,905
AWP10,092
MP91,187
Tec-91,184
FAMAS1,095

Lifetime map wins

13,431dust2
4,431inferno
4,308nuke
922vertigo
645office
310train
144italy
91lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
50%Win rate
0.67Avg K/D
64.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage250%0.7815.0
Dust2250%0.9210.0
Nuke10%0.447.0
Vertigo10%0.578.0
Inferno1100%0.7316.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.9%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
67.1%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
692msReaction time
54.5%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
13.22HE damage / grenade
4.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.9305% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.1964% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0512%29 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0011%29 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0312%28 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0113%28 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0215%28 Oct →
mirage13–100.0314%28 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0313%26 Oct →
dust213–110.0214%26 Oct →
mirage16–120.0015%26 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0919%25 Oct →
mirage13–110.0016%25 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0511%25 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0113%24 Oct →
anubis15–150.0320%24 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.076%23 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.076%23 Oct →
nuke15–150.025%23 Oct →
anubis13–90.0520%23 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.049%23 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0216%22 Oct →
mirage5–130.0220%22 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0111%22 Oct →
dust213–40.0113%22 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0313%22 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0110%21 Oct →
dust28–130.0119%19 Oct →
nuke13–20.0314%19 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.1124%19 Oct →
dust213–30.0420%19 Oct →
cache13–20.0913%18 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0113%18 Oct →
cache13–80.022%18 Oct →
mirage11–130.017%14 Oct →
dust27–130.0017%13 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0217%13 Oct →
dust213–60.0310%13 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0216%13 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0713%12 Oct →
dust215–150.0014%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0515%12 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0312%11 Oct →
dust213–110.005%11 Oct →
mirage13–40.0723%11 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0413%11 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0317%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0717%10 Oct →
dust214–160.0623%10 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.028%8 Oct →
nuke13–10.0714%8 Oct →
nuke9–130.0110%7 Oct →
cache11–130.0515%7 Oct →
mirage13–110.0113%7 Oct →
inferno11–130.0021%7 Oct →
dust213–2-0.008%7 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0317%5 Oct →
dust213–100.0120%5 Oct →
ancient16–130.0516%4 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0115%4 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0616%2 Oct →
nuke13–60.0017%2 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0124%2 Oct →
ancient13–90.0512%29 Sept →
inferno7–3-0.0117%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.0519%29 Sept →
nuke15–150.0416%29 Sept →
dust26–130.0614%29 Sept →
anubis13–80.0219%29 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0134%28 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0124%28 Sept →
nuke13–30.1313%28 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0013%24 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0416%24 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.018%19 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.048%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0511%19 Sept →
cache13–160.018%18 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0610%18 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0425%14 Sept →
ancient13–80.009%13 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.079%13 Sept →
dust213–60.0216%13 Sept →
inferno4–130.0219%13 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0514%13 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0514%13 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.079%13 Sept →
cache13–4-0.049%12 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0619%12 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0417%12 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.039%12 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.019%12 Sept →
dust213–100.0412%9 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.057%9 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0210%9 Sept →
dust25–130.0419%1 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.1120%1 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0314%1 Sept →
vertigo3–9-0.1315%30 Aug →
overpass7–9-0.169%30 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.056%29 Aug →
anubis13–90.0130%29 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.