RvonA

RvonA — CS2 Stats

DE76561197963574373[U:1:3308645]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,142Tracked matches23%Win rate2021Tracked since
5,100Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating4,082Grey band · top ~82.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,082 -5,918 20 Apr – 29 Sept · 19 days played
4,08210,000peak 10,00020 Apr29 Sept
10,000Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-04-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,918 below peak (10,000)
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 918 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,969), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate35.6%42.7%43.8%8.1% short
Shot accuracy7.4%11.3%12.0%4.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.730.991.020.28 short
Match win rate40.6%43.9%44.7%4.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRvonAFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER4,082 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning64
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY32–66–2Last 10032%Win rateLWLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility6.0
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning6.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time604ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy13.0%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 7–13 · anubis, 21 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 29 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 23 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 43% over 7anubisWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C208–1240%-0.01
infernoD184–1422%-0.01
nukeC177–1041%-0.01
ancientC166–1038%0.00
anubisD122–1017%0.00
cacheC73–443%0.01
mirageD61–517%0.00
overpass—41–325%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,076Lifetime kills
0.73K/D
5,973Matches
40.6%Match win rate
35.6%Headshot %
7.4%Shot accuracy
10,445MVPs
2,379Hours (in match)
9,168Bombs planted
1,345Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,756
AWP13,860
MAC-101,344
MP9779
Knife700

Lifetime map wins

18,998dust2
8,421inferno
7,173nuke
2,858vertigo
612train
367office
26italy
8cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

25Matches
44%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
64.6ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2786%0.9414.7
Anubis333%0.4610.3
Inferno367%1.0914.7
Ancient20%0.589.5
Nuke20%0.569.5
Mirage20%0.529.5
Vertigo10%1.0017.0
Overpass10%0.6710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
69.0%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
602msReaction time
68.2%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
9.07HE damage / grenade
11.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2054° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0594% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–160.067%29 Sept →
dust213–70.0124%29 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0735%29 Sept →
anubis13–80.0812%29 Sept →
inferno9–130.0018%28 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.078%28 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0211%28 Sept →
nuke13–80.0012%28 Sept →
nuke7–130.0510%28 Sept →
ancient13–20.058%28 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0311%24 Sept →
inferno10–130.0015%24 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0215%24 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0311%23 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.039%23 Sept →
nuke3–130.0015%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.039%23 Sept →
cache10–130.0112%23 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0415%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.038%22 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0223%22 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0515%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0410%22 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.024%22 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0718%22 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0512%21 Sept →
cache8–130.0413%21 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0314%21 Sept →
anubis7–130.1313%21 Sept →
dust214–160.0410%21 Sept →
inferno10–130.073%21 Sept →
nuke11–130.052%21 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0128%21 Sept →
cache13–80.0417%20 Sept →
dust213–80.0019%20 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.002%20 Sept →
mirage11–130.039%20 Sept →
nuke13–40.047%20 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0812%20 Sept →
anubis8–130.0011%20 Sept →
inferno9–130.048%20 Sept →
inferno13–160.0819%15 Sept →
ancient9–130.0516%15 Sept →
cache13–40.0514%15 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.018%15 Sept →
dust214–160.0316%15 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.1016%15 Sept →
dust26–130.0525%15 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0514%15 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0221%14 Sept →
ancient8–130.0311%14 Sept →
cache13–5-0.009%14 Sept →
anubis6–130.0113%14 Sept →
inferno10–130.0610%14 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0310%14 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0515%6 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0613%6 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0024%6 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0215%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0411%6 Sept →
dust213–11-0.046%2 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.039%2 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0213%2 Sept →
dust25–130.0217%1 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0516%1 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0017%1 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0611%5 Jun →
mirage9–130.004%4 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0410%4 Jun →
overpass8–130.015%4 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0214%4 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0720%3 Jun →
nuke16–140.0012%3 Jun →
dust216–140.018%3 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0419%22 May →
ancient8–13-0.028%21 May →
dust22–13-0.0915%21 May →
nuke13–100.0211%21 May →
anubis11–130.0113%21 May →
inferno13–40.0321%21 May →
dust213–11-0.0212%20 May →
inferno6–13-0.049%20 May →
ancient13–6-0.015%20 May →
anubis10–13-0.0112%20 May →
nuke8–13-0.0511%20 May →
ancient13–110.0414%12 May →
anubis16–13-0.0312%11 May →
overpass13–80.0219%11 May →
ancient13–8-0.0523%11 May →
overpass1–13-0.140%11 May →
ancient13–160.0617%11 May →
nuke15–15-0.0111%11 May →
ancient6–130.0522%10 May →
nuke14–160.0016%10 May →
dust29–130.0117%10 May →
anubis5–13-0.0219%10 May →
inferno13–90.1019%10 May →
overpass6–130.007%21 Apr →
nuke1–13-0.1213%21 Apr →
dust28–130.0218%20 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.