幸運 T𝑒𝓃𝒿𝒾 幸運 — CS2 Stats

ID76561199515670050[U:1:1555404322]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,992Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since

926Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating21,021Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#70497 of 261638 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,021 -2,086 18 Jul – 11 Nov · 36 days played

25,375Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,686Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

39Days played since 2026-07-10

Premier CS Rating

4,354 below peak (25,375)
-1,862 over 30 days · declining
-3,753 over 90 days
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,979 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	45.5%	46.8%	48.2%	2.7% short
Shot accuracy	4.8%	13.0%	13.2%	8.4% short
Kill/death ratio	1.65	1.06	1.07	above
Match win rate	48.2%	46.3%	46.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning72

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateWWWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −4.5pp headshot accuracy · +41ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.06
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 582ms

Last 20

10–10 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.6

Utility5.8

Positioning7.2

Opening Duels4.2

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning7.2

Utility5.8

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels6.9

Win Impact2.8

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time588ms−73ms

first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy19.6%−4.1%

first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–8 · anubis, 14 Aug →

41%Best headshot accuracy · 15–15 · inferno, 20 Aug →

422msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 26 Aug →

13–2Biggest win · inferno, 21 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 17nukeWeakest map · 25% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	20	14–6	70%	0.04
ancient	D	18	6–12	33%	0.03
anubis	S	17	12–5	71%	0.03
nuke	D	16	4–12	25%	0.02
mirage	B	12	6–6	50%	0.04
cache	S	9	6–3	67%	0.04
dust2	D	7	2–5	29%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,743Lifetime kills

1.65K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players

2,249Matches

48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players

45.5%Headshot %

4.8%Shot accuracy

7,147MVPs

926Hours (in match)

2,190Bombs planted

836Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,490

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,683

AWP2,768

P2000 / USP-S2,602

Glock-182,256

Desert Eagle1,854

Galil AR1,578

MP91,381

FAMAS1,313

MAG-71,021

Lifetime map wins

3,746inferno

3,197nuke

1,685dust2

799vertigo

614train

20italy

9lake

2cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

334Matches

55%Win rate

1.24Avg K/D

91.2ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	58	52%	1.34	18.4
Anubis	38	71%	1.29	17.9
Inferno	22	55%	1.30	19.7
Ancient	19	42%	1.19	18.4
Nuke	15	60%	1.36	17.1
Dust2	10	70%	1.27	13.8
Overpass	7	57%	1.70	16.6
Vertigo	6	67%	1.24	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy

41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.5%Spray accuracy

81.6%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

588msReaction time

64.6%T opening success

50.3%CT opening success

0.77Enemies flashed / flash

3.2%Flash assists

6.05HE damage / grenade

21.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	16–13	0.08	20%	11 Nov →
mirage	13–4	0.07	15%	11 Nov →
dust2	13–11	0.04	19%	11 Nov →
anubis	11–13	0.06	10%	22 Oct →
anubis	11–13	0.03	14%	22 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.08	15%	30 Sept →
mirage	5–13	0.02	13%	30 Sept →
dust2	4–13	0.04	19%	27 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.04	13%	27 Sept →
inferno	16–14	0.05	26%	21 Sept →
dust2	0–13	-0.05	21%	21 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.07	33%	17 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.03	12%	17 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.10	18%	17 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.02	16%	16 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.01	17%	15 Sept →
nuke	7–13	0.01	36%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.11	16%	15 Sept →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	15%	15 Sept →
inferno	0–13	-0.07	24%	15 Sept →
mirage	6–13	0.01	18%	15 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	15%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.03	18%	15 Sept →
nuke	8–13	0.01	16%	14 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.06	22%	14 Sept →
inferno	0–13	-0.02	32%	7 Sept →
anubis	13–10	0.07	12%	7 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.07	13%	5 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	19%	5 Sept →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	34%	2 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.02	16%	2 Sept →
inferno	16–13	0.03	27%	31 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.11	35%	26 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	22%	26 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	17%	26 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.03	26%	26 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.03	16%	23 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.09	19%	21 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.05	41%	20 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	17%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.02	11%	19 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	16%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	24%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	11%	16 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.09	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.13	19%	14 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.07	20%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.17	32%	14 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.06	22%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.12	17%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	16%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.15	20%	12 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.07	22%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	25%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	23%	8 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	21%	7 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.03	26%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.09	19%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	23%	7 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.09	26%	6 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	14%	5 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.04	22%	5 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	0.13	25%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	21%	5 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	26%	4 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.11	24%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.06	23%	3 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	31%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	22%	2 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	20%	2 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	24%	2 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	16%	1 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.08	24%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.07	21%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	11%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.08	19%	28 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.03	20%	28 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.04	41%	27 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.03	20%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.16	14%	23 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	24%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	29%	21 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	27%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.08	38%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	26%	21 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	16%	20 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	6%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.10	27%	20 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.03	10%	20 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	26%	20 Jul →
nuke	12–16	0.06	16%	20 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	29%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.04	39%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.08	23%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	34%	11 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.03	31%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	31%	11 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.05	24%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	18%	10 Jul →