Orkkis

Orkkis — CS2 Stats

FI76561199216132325[U:1:1255866597]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,620Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
8,762Hours in CS69Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating12,092Blue band · top ~43.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 824 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 20 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,092 +71 21 Aug19 Sept · 15 days played
11,21514,334peak 14,33421 Aug19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 824 +0 30 Aug18 Sept · 4 observations
824824peak 82430 Aug18 Sept
14,334Peak Premier in tracked matches
824Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 824
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 77 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,242 below peak (14,334)
  • +71 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,908 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,399), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate35.5%41.3%41.9%6.4% short
Shot accuracy7.6%12.6%12.2%4.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.520.950.980.46 short
Match win rate38.3%42.5%43.3%5.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 3 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOrkkisFACEITLevel 2 · 824 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER12,092 · Blue bandPEAK ELO824csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim33
Positioning44
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateWWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · +77ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim3.3
Utility4.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3
Positioning4.4
Utility4.7
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.07 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time576ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy8.5%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 8.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.04Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 30 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · nuke, 28 Aug
383msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 9 Sept
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 30cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA30191163%-0.05
nukeA1811761%-0.04
anubisA1610663%-0.03
ancientB136746%-0.06
cacheD72529%-0.05
dust2C52340%-0.06
mirage41325%-0.05
train31233%-0.06
vertigo21150%-0.04
office1010%-0.13
overpass1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

100,705Lifetime kills
0.52K/D
9,831Matches
38.3%Match win rate
35.5%Headshot %
7.6%Shot accuracy
11,093MVPs
4,302Hours (in match)
11,945Bombs planted
2,053Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,922
MP96,955
MAC-105,383
P2504,937
Knife2,107
FAMAS1,963

Lifetime map wins

18,196nuke
16,786inferno
6,409dust2
5,175train
4,833vertigo
656office
410cbble
105lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

975Matches
48%Win rate
0.69Avg K/D
58.3ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno21155%0.7110.9
Ancient18742%0.6611.3
Nuke17853%0.7510.7
Anubis17150%0.7310.8
Dust27439%0.629.3
Overpass5646%0.6510.8
Mirage4833%0.579.5
Train2148%0.719.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

8.5%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
65.4%Counter-strafing
12.8°Preaim
574msReaction time
42.6%T opening success
31.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
5.86HE damage / grenade
4.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7641° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 8.5339% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4601 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.0115%20 Sept
inferno13–6-0.029%20 Sept
mirage6–13-0.100%19 Sept
ancient4–13-0.128%19 Sept
inferno12–160.0116%18 Sept
nuke13–80.0011%18 Sept
ancient7–13-0.083%17 Sept
inferno16–13-0.089%17 Sept
inferno10–130.015%17 Sept
ancient13–7-0.046%16 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0115%16 Sept
cache14–16-0.038%16 Sept
nuke11–13-0.046%15 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0517%14 Sept
inferno13–9-0.049%14 Sept
inferno12–16-0.049%14 Sept
cache2–13-0.039%14 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0117%14 Sept
anubis0–13-0.0910%14 Sept
inferno13–11-0.065%13 Sept
anubis11–13-0.054%13 Sept
inferno13–80.017%13 Sept
inferno13–1-0.030%13 Sept
anubis13–20.0215%13 Sept
inferno16–13-0.058%13 Sept
nuke13–16-0.096%13 Sept
nuke11–30.010%12 Sept
ancient16–130.008%12 Sept
anubis16–14-0.0211%12 Sept
inferno13–8-0.035%12 Sept
inferno13–2-0.085%12 Sept
nuke13–3-0.0014%12 Sept
inferno10–130.0112%11 Sept
inferno12–16-0.057%10 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0514%10 Sept
inferno5–13-0.116%10 Sept
nuke9–13-0.103%10 Sept
cache9–13-0.064%10 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0221%10 Sept
anubis9–13-0.054%9 Sept
dust24–13-0.0814%9 Sept
inferno11–13-0.105%9 Sept
inferno13–11-0.049%7 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0510%7 Sept
inferno13–9-0.067%7 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0511%7 Sept
inferno13–8-0.096%6 Sept
ancient13–6-0.057%6 Sept
dust213–8-0.0111%6 Sept
dust210–13-0.0713%4 Sept
nuke13–5-0.035%4 Sept
ancient9–13-0.046%4 Sept
dust213–10-0.0710%3 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0312%3 Sept
nuke9–13-0.008%3 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0316%3 Sept
anubis13–70.0210%3 Sept
inferno13–50.0020%2 Sept
anubis13–90.004%2 Sept
ancient13–5-0.022%2 Sept
anubis5–130.0010%30 Aug
nuke9–13-0.037%30 Aug
mirage13–10.028%30 Aug
nuke13–6-0.016%30 Aug
nuke13–10.043%30 Aug
anubis13–10-0.037%30 Aug
cache19–17-0.039%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0811%29 Aug
nuke13–11-0.044%29 Aug
cache13–3-0.037%29 Aug
anubis13–6-0.118%29 Aug
nuke1–13-0.10100%28 Aug
train11–13-0.0415%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.1220%28 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.039%28 Aug
dust28–13-0.1019%28 Aug
office10–13-0.1320%28 Aug
nuke13–7-0.070%28 Aug
inferno0–13-0.120%28 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0513%27 Aug
cache4–13-0.103%27 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0723%25 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0221%25 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0211%24 Aug
inferno13–11-0.027%24 Aug
inferno13–9-0.039%23 Aug
inferno13–8-0.026%23 Aug
ancient2–7-0.0410%21 Aug
train13–6-0.056%21 Aug
anubis10–6-0.060%21 Aug
nuke16–13-0.072%21 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0513%21 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0714%21 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0311%21 Aug
overpass6–13-0.104%21 Aug
train9–13-0.098%21 Aug
ancient2–13-0.130%21 Aug
nuke13–3-0.060%21 Aug
vertigo13–3-0.0511%20 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1214%20 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →