Burden

Burden — CS2 Stats

FI76561197981264086[U:1:20998358]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,129Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,031Top 5% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6353 of 259968 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,031 +4,881 28 Aug – 3 Nov · 22 days played
22,15027,186peak 27,18628 Aug3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,342 +0 28 Aug – 14 Sept · 3 observations
2,3422,342peak 2,34228 Aug14 Sept
27,364Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,342Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 155 below peak (27,186)
  • +3,333 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,969 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-10-23
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBurdenFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,031 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,342csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning68
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateWLWLTLLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 444ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 7–10–3 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.6
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.8
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time484ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 484ms
Headshot accuracy26.3%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–10 · ancient, 30 Oct →
80%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 8 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 30 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 3 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB189–950%0.02
infernoB178–947%0.03
cacheS1510–567%0.03
dust2S1510–567%0.04
mirageD124–833%0.03
ancientA106–460%0.05
anubisD51–420%0.02
train—42–250%0.07
vertigo—42–250%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,170Matches
52%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
82.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke9157%1.3318.4
Ancient8251%1.2616.0
Dust26253%1.3017.2
Mirage5951%1.0315.7
Inferno5860%1.3417.3
Anubis5753%1.2516.5
Overpass2756%1.1416.3
Vertigo1250%1.0016.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
483msReaction time
34.9%T opening success
62.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
11.46HE damage / grenade
9.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9131% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0324%3 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0329%3 Nov →
mirage13–00.1735%3 Nov →
inferno4–130.0224%2 Nov →
nuke15–150.0424%2 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0133%2 Nov →
inferno6–130.0519%2 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0229%31 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0227%31 Oct →
nuke15–150.0118%31 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0613%31 Oct →
cache13–50.0321%31 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0332%31 Oct →
dust28–130.0538%30 Oct →
inferno13–60.0919%30 Oct →
ancient13–100.2229%30 Oct →
train13–110.0936%30 Oct →
cache10–130.1430%30 Oct →
dust212–120.0728%30 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0733%29 Oct →
cache13–80.0528%29 Oct →
nuke13–10.0414%29 Oct →
inferno13–70.0622%29 Oct →
mirage13–90.1422%29 Oct →
nuke13–40.0526%29 Oct →
anubis13–160.0430%27 Oct →
mirage7–130.0216%27 Oct →
nuke13–90.0732%27 Oct →
nuke13–40.1138%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0022%26 Oct →
ancient8–130.0119%26 Oct →
cache13–10.0934%26 Oct →
dust213–100.0324%26 Oct →
ancient12–30.0523%25 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0325%23 Oct →
ancient13–90.0015%23 Oct →
vertigo13–70.1158%23 Oct →
train11–130.1024%23 Oct →
inferno11–130.1017%23 Oct →
dust213–60.0547%23 Oct →
inferno13–80.0220%22 Oct →
cache13–110.0223%22 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0727%20 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0423%20 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.1019%20 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0337%18 Oct →
cache10–130.0438%18 Oct →
cache13–80.0118%18 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0523%17 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0615%17 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0525%17 Oct →
mirage11–130.0612%17 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0432%17 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0215%16 Oct →
inferno8–40.1224%16 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0329%16 Oct →
dust25–1-0.0633%16 Oct →
mirage4–130.0145%15 Oct →
nuke13–80.1417%15 Oct →
dust213–90.1427%15 Oct →
cache13–110.1523%15 Oct →
ancient13–10.1033%15 Oct →
dust213–100.0233%15 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0324%15 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.1316%15 Oct →
anubis13–60.0427%14 Oct →
mirage13–100.0916%14 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0412%14 Oct →
nuke12–120.0719%14 Oct →
mirage11–130.0735%14 Oct →
cache8–130.0019%13 Oct →
dust213–80.1419%13 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0317%11 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0525%11 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0433%11 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0229%11 Oct →
dust25–130.0020%11 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0820%9 Oct →
dust213–80.048%9 Oct →
anubis10–130.0226%9 Oct →
nuke11–3-0.0018%9 Oct →
ancient13–30.0318%9 Oct →
cache13–60.0521%9 Oct →
nuke6–130.0320%8 Oct →
dust213–110.0427%8 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0923%8 Oct →
inferno13–50.1137%8 Oct →
nuke7–130.0542%8 Oct →
anubis5–130.0214%8 Oct →
vertigo4–130.0725%8 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0133%8 Oct →
train4–13-0.0028%8 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0450%8 Oct →
ancient6–130.0111%8 Oct →
dust213–90.0980%8 Oct →
train13–70.1022%7 Oct →
inferno13–80.0821%6 Oct →
inferno13–50.1221%6 Oct →
ancient13–30.1416%6 Oct →
dust213–90.1043%6 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.