NLSprite

NLSprite — CS2 Stats

76561199068419589[U:1:1108153861]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

833Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
975Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,352Purple band · top ~23% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,352 -1,165 29 Jul – 29 Oct · 25 days played
15,66018,268peak 18,26829 Jul29 Oct
18,268Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2026-07-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,916 below peak (18,268)
  • -484 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,627 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,648 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate47.6%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy2.4%12.4%12.7%10.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.031.050.10 short
Match win rate46.7%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNLSpriteFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,352 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning67
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateWWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −5.6pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility6.1
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.7
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time530ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 530ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 20 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · vertigo, 15 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · mirage, 10 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 5 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 61% over 18infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC208–1240%0.01
ancientA1811–761%0.02
anubisA159–660%0.00
infernoC135–838%0.03
mirageB137–654%-0.01
dust2A127–558%0.02
vertigoC52–340%0.00
nuke—31–233%0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,797Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
1,331Matches
46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
47.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2.4%Shot accuracy
3,306MVPs
507Hours (in match)
1,266Bombs planted
522Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,263nuke
2,156dust2
1,314inferno
873vertigo
39cbble
27train
18lake
12office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

198Matches
50%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
87.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3441%1.1115.7
Dust22955%1.4117.3
Anubis2952%1.1515.6
Nuke2560%1.4218.1
Ancient2454%1.2117.5
Cache2348%1.2116.7
Inferno2232%1.1817.1
Overpass786%1.2716.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
529msReaction time
52.7%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
10.81HE damage / grenade
12.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0433%5 Nov →
anubis13–10.0716%5 Nov →
ancient13–50.0218%2 Nov →
inferno6–13-0.049%2 Nov →
inferno13–100.0824%2 Nov →
mirage11–130.0327%2 Nov →
anubis13–10-0.0214%29 Oct →
dust27–130.018%29 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0322%28 Oct →
dust28–130.0228%28 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0712%23 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0031%23 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0324%21 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0121%20 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0129%20 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0123%20 Oct →
anubis13–100.0237%20 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0434%20 Oct →
ancient13–40.1019%19 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0026%17 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.019%17 Oct →
inferno4–130.0622%17 Oct →
overpass9–30.1310%16 Oct →
ancient13–90.0220%16 Oct →
cache9–130.0220%15 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0811%15 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0238%13 Oct →
anubis4–130.0121%13 Oct →
cache10–130.0125%12 Oct →
dust213–110.0828%11 Oct →
ancient13–20.1016%11 Oct →
ancient7–130.1017%10 Oct →
nuke4–130.0020%8 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0318%8 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0319%8 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0316%8 Oct →
mirage13–50.0218%8 Oct →
vertigo13–16-0.0124%7 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0627%1 Oct →
vertigo13–90.0319%1 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0427%29 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0422%24 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0318%22 Sept →
inferno13–100.0324%22 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0217%22 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0612%19 Sept →
ancient11–130.1021%19 Sept →
cache13–70.0218%19 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0526%19 Sept →
cache7–130.0440%17 Sept →
dust26–130.0317%15 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0050%15 Sept →
cache13–60.0719%15 Sept →
anubis13–80.035%12 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0621%11 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0416%10 Sept →
ancient5–130.0013%10 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.1017%9 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0516%9 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.029%9 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0716%9 Sept →
inferno10–130.0327%9 Sept →
mirage13–80.0318%9 Sept →
cache16–120.0115%7 Sept →
dust213–70.0024%7 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0020%5 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0219%3 Sept →
cache17–19-0.0319%2 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0120%2 Sept →
anubis13–100.0226%2 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0217%1 Sept →
mirage13–60.0326%1 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0122%1 Sept →
dust213–30.0618%26 Aug →
ancient13–100.0127%25 Aug →
cache13–10.1333%24 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0315%24 Aug →
cache10–130.0127%21 Aug →
inferno7–130.0927%20 Aug →
mirage13–70.0423%20 Aug →
nuke9–60.0821%20 Aug →
inferno9–30.2124%20 Aug →
inferno9–40.1450%20 Aug →
dust219–160.0329%19 Aug →
cache13–160.0416%17 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0416%11 Aug →
cache13–110.0029%11 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0118%6 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0422%5 Aug →
dust213–50.0519%30 Jul →
ancient16–140.0726%29 Jul →
ancient13–90.0118%23 Jul →
mirage16–140.0328%22 Jul →
anubis9–130.0722%21 Jul →
anubis13–40.0718%21 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0519%21 Jul →
cache13–100.0619%18 Jul →
mirage13–20.0222%16 Jul →
dust213–100.0125%15 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0515%14 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.