Mini

Mini — CS2 Stats

US76561198844779065[U:1:884513337]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

490Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 861 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 861 → 861
+2Tracked matches · now 490
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 7 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,771 +772 8 May5 Jul · 19 days played
9,99911,774peak 11,7748 May5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 861 +0 30 Aug13 Sept · 3 observations
861861peak 86130 Aug13 Sept
12,114Peak Premier in tracked matches
861Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-05-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 861
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 40 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMiniFACEITLevel 5 · 861 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO861csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning58
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateLLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · +97ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 695ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility4.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time621ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 16 Jun
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 1 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 8 Jun
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 17 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 88% over 8dust2Weakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2391439%0.01
ancientA159660%0.01
mirageA148657%0.00
anubisC135838%0.02
dust2C114736%0.00
cacheB84450%0.03
infernoS87188%0.02
overpassS54180%0.00
vertigo21150%0.02
shelter110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

158Matches
48%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
78.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2638%0.9715.0
Nuke2544%1.2116.5
Inferno2060%1.0715.3
Ancient2050%1.0515.8
Anubis2050%1.2214.9
Dust21323%0.8413.1
Cache1369%1.3117.9
Overpass967%1.2417.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
86.5%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
639msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
47.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
8.24HE damage / grenade
5.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8252% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–130.0114%11 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.0324%3 Sept
dust212–16-0.0319%1 Sept
mirage13–60.0137%1 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0812%25 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0625%11 Aug
cache10–130.0814%9 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0221%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0536%2 Aug
mirage13–20.0726%17 Jul
mirage13–20.0824%16 Jul
nuke13–160.0613%16 Jul
cache13–90.0524%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0928%11 Jul
cache13–110.0523%11 Jul
ancient4–130.059%11 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0623%9 Jul
shelter13–110.0419%8 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0122%8 Jul
anubis7–13-0.035%8 Jul
mirage12–160.0215%8 Jul
dust213–160.0117%8 Jul
overpass13–60.0210%6 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0119%5 Jul
anubis13–40.1610%5 Jul
nuke9–130.0127%4 Jul
anubis9–130.0319%4 Jul
overpass13–110.0418%3 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0420%3 Jul
overpass13–50.0228%1 Jul
dust210–13-0.0017%26 Jun
ancient16–12-0.038%26 Jun
dust20–2-0.000%26 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0318%24 Jun
anubis13–40.0416%23 Jun
overpass10–130.0113%23 Jun
anubis10–130.0017%22 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0513%22 Jun
inferno5–130.0224%21 Jun
nuke13–40.0513%20 Jun
inferno13–110.0313%20 Jun
nuke9–130.0218%19 Jun
ancient13–90.0017%19 Jun
inferno13–110.0121%16 Jun
ancient13–40.1722%16 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0216%16 Jun
nuke13–80.1425%15 Jun
mirage15–15-0.059%14 Jun
nuke13–60.0220%12 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0022%11 Jun
vertigo13–90.0621%9 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0014%9 Jun
ancient13–40.0533%9 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0421%9 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0417%8 Jun
ancient13–60.0137%8 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0220%8 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0018%6 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0225%6 Jun
ancient13–30.098%6 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0327%6 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0422%6 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0423%6 Jun
cache19–160.0427%5 Jun
nuke11–130.0321%5 Jun
nuke8–130.0221%3 Jun
dust215–15-0.0224%3 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0733%29 May
cache4–130.0217%29 May
dust213–5-0.0021%28 May
nuke7–13-0.0130%27 May
cache11–13-0.0517%26 May
dust213–6-0.028%25 May
mirage6–130.0110%22 May
inferno13–80.0330%22 May
inferno13–30.0617%22 May
nuke13–2-0.0510%21 May
nuke10–13-0.0532%21 May
anubis13–90.0611%21 May
anubis11–130.0418%20 May
inferno16–140.0217%18 May
inferno16–130.0431%18 May
mirage16–19-0.0315%17 May
dust210–130.0225%16 May
nuke13–70.0325%16 May
mirage13–50.0025%16 May
dust210–130.0123%14 May
nuke13–30.0016%14 May
cache13–30.0817%14 May
dust213–80.0221%13 May
dust213–50.0226%13 May
anubis13–40.0725%13 May
anubis3–13-0.0710%13 May
ancient13–9-0.0018%13 May
mirage9–13-0.0218%13 May
nuke13–110.0424%11 May
nuke17–19-0.0114%10 May
overpass13–11-0.0615%8 May
ancient11–130.0027%8 May
nuke13–160.0225%7 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →