Summer

Summer — CS2 Stats

CA76561197977011305[U:1:16745577]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,837Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,105Blue band · top ~38.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,029 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,105 -976 28 Aug – 13 Oct · 24 days played
12,98016,514peak 16,51428 Aug13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,029 +0 28 Aug – 21 Sept · 7 observations
1,0291,029peak 1,02928 Aug21 Sept
16,514Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,029Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,029
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 22 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,409 below peak (16,514)
  • +125 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,895 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSummerFACEITLevel 6 · 1,029 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER13,105 · Blue band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,029csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning49
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateWWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility5.5
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time566ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 5 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · mirage, 6 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · anubis, 6 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 21infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2113–862%0.01
ancientC188–1044%-0.00
mirageC177–1041%0.00
anubisC146–843%-0.00
nukeC146–843%-0.01
infernoC83–538%-0.02
cacheA74–357%0.02
office—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

615Matches
48%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
77.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust214350%1.0516.0
Nuke9742%0.9015.3
Mirage9254%0.9514.8
Ancient8849%0.9414.9
Anubis7152%1.0915.6
Inferno3743%0.9515.3
Cache3244%1.0518.0
Overpass2241%0.9516.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
573msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
26.2%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
9.40HE damage / grenade
11.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4885 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4591% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0117%13 Oct →
dust29–10.0116%13 Oct →
dust23–130.0522%13 Oct →
mirage7–130.0814%13 Oct →
anubis6–130.0719%13 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0418%13 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0913%13 Oct →
cache10–130.0418%12 Oct →
office4–13-0.0314%12 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0417%12 Oct →
dust211–130.0015%12 Oct →
mirage11–60.0418%12 Oct →
anubis13–110.0126%11 Oct →
dust212–12-0.037%11 Oct →
dust213–70.0530%11 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0115%11 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0319%10 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0017%10 Oct →
mirage8–130.0320%10 Oct →
dust216–130.1022%10 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0216%10 Oct →
cache13–80.1319%10 Oct →
mirage5–130.0425%9 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0111%9 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0924%9 Oct →
cache8–130.0121%9 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0121%8 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0418%8 Oct →
ancient13–80.0423%8 Oct →
mirage13–50.0313%8 Oct →
anubis0–13-0.105%8 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0528%7 Oct →
dust216–130.0722%7 Oct →
mirage8–130.0329%7 Oct →
nuke19–170.0417%7 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0419%6 Oct →
ancient13–40.018%6 Oct →
dust213–60.0215%6 Oct →
ancient8–130.0513%6 Oct →
nuke14–160.0018%6 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.039%6 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0640%6 Oct →
anubis0–13-0.0815%6 Oct →
anubis0–13-0.0716%6 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0027%5 Oct →
inferno13–40.1039%5 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0522%5 Oct →
cache16–140.0119%5 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0223%5 Oct →
ancient13–50.1323%5 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0429%5 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0415%3 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0522%3 Oct →
nuke10–130.0619%3 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0229%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0522%2 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.029%2 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0125%1 Oct →
anubis13–80.0619%1 Oct →
anubis10–130.0514%1 Oct →
anubis9–130.0413%1 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0213%1 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0710%1 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0016%30 Sept →
nuke13–50.0417%29 Sept →
dust213–80.0313%29 Sept →
inferno13–160.0024%29 Sept →
dust213–50.0826%29 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0721%29 Sept →
anubis11–130.0124%29 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0412%28 Sept →
cache13–110.0315%28 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0224%28 Sept →
ancient7–1-0.0221%28 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0917%28 Sept →
ancient10–130.0116%28 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0214%25 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0517%24 Sept →
ancient13–60.058%23 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0319%23 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0415%22 Sept →
anubis13–100.0212%22 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0612%22 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.027%22 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0122%22 Sept →
anubis13–50.0621%20 Sept →
mirage13–110.0426%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.048%20 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0914%19 Sept →
dust213–40.0929%19 Sept →
mirage13–70.0824%18 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0222%18 Sept →
nuke13–40.0822%18 Sept →
ancient7–130.0116%17 Sept →
nuke16–140.0019%17 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0717%17 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0425%17 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0221%17 Sept →
ancient9–130.0521%16 Sept →
dust26–30.0226%16 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.