Nixs

Nixs — CS2 Stats

US76561199014634256[U:1:1054368528]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,118Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,311Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,585 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,585 → 1,585
+17Tracked matches · now 1,118
+6.7ppWin rate · 36.7% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 14 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,585 +0 28 Aug9 Sept · 2 observations
1,5851,585peak 1,58528 Aug9 Sept
1,585Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-05-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,585
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 166 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches1714+3
Win rate53%43%+10pp
K/D1.100.76+0.34
Headshot %51%51%+1pp

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate50.5%44.9%45.8%above
Shot accuracy7.8%12.4%12.7%4.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.901.041.050.15 short
Match win rate48.2%45.3%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNixsFACEITLevel 6 · 1,585 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,585csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning41
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4753Last 10047%Win rateWLWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +7.0pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 685ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility4.9
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.1
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time633ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.37Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 10 Sept
51%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · office, 10 Sept
469msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 16 Jul
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 10 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26131350%0.00
anubisC2191243%-0.02
cacheC135838%-0.01
dust2B136746%-0.02
infernoD113827%-0.01
ancientB63350%0.02
nukeS54180%0.07
vertigo330100%0.01
office110100%0.08
overpass1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,258Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
1,231Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
50.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
7.8%Shot accuracy
2,996MVPs
1,041Hours (in match)
1,444Bombs planted
420Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,222inferno
1,996dust2
896nuke
522vertigo
329train
21office
2italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,056Matches
52%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
78.2ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27354%1.0817.1
Inferno11950%0.9816.3
Dust211843%0.9315.2
Ancient9848%0.8714.6
Anubis7947%0.8914.4
Overpass5347%0.9316.4
Nuke4134%0.8513.9
Cache3339%1.1214.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.2%Spray accuracy
68.3%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
628msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
7.62HE damage / grenade
9.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0712% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0413%14 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0625%14 Sept
cache13–40.1114%14 Sept
nuke9–10.3738%10 Sept
mirage5–130.0738%10 Sept
office13–60.0851%10 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0730%8 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0110%8 Sept
dust216–12-0.0016%8 Sept
nuke13–110.0222%5 Sept
nuke13–80.0226%5 Sept
cache6–13-0.0715%4 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0417%4 Sept
dust26–130.0317%4 Sept
dust211–13-0.0216%3 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0222%28 Aug
mirage13–70.0621%27 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0019%27 Aug
cache16–14-0.0321%24 Aug
mirage19–160.0215%24 Aug
mirage7–130.0321%24 Aug
cache3–13-0.0028%23 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0819%21 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0713%18 Aug
ancient8–130.0627%17 Aug
cache16–13-0.0314%15 Aug
vertigo13–60.0634%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0218%14 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0128%14 Aug
anubis7–130.0121%14 Aug
inferno9–130.0533%13 Aug
cache6–13-0.0237%12 Aug
dust210–13-0.0618%11 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0014%11 Aug
dust213–1-0.0310%10 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0550%10 Aug
cache11–13-0.0815%10 Aug
mirage10–130.0515%9 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0434%9 Aug
dust27–130.0423%9 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0418%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0715%7 Aug
vertigo13–6-0.0513%7 Aug
vertigo13–50.0221%7 Aug
mirage11–0-0.055%7 Aug
cache13–100.0128%7 Aug
mirage13–110.0122%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0422%4 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0133%3 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0229%3 Aug
ancient13–100.0120%3 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0519%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0715%2 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0229%2 Aug
dust213–100.0222%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0317%30 Jul
cache13–40.1218%26 Jul
mirage13–60.0528%26 Jul
ancient13–100.0425%24 Jul
mirage13–160.0020%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.048%17 Jul
dust213–9-0.0415%17 Jul
inferno7–130.0125%16 Jul
dust213–10-0.0316%16 Jul
anubis7–13-0.073%14 Jul
cache6–13-0.0333%14 Jul
anubis13–50.0021%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.0716%4 Jul
anubis15–19-0.0519%2 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0415%26 Jun
anubis9–130.0111%20 Jun
dust213–160.0221%20 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0113%19 Jun
inferno4–130.0129%19 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0130%19 Jun
anubis11–130.0232%17 Jun
mirage5–130.0229%15 Jun
dust27–13-0.0814%15 Jun
dust213–90.0229%12 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0311%11 Jun
anubis13–110.0222%11 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0022%10 Jun
anubis11–130.0122%10 Jun
ancient13–70.0622%9 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0226%9 Jun
overpass11–130.0428%8 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0117%8 Jun
anubis13–60.0315%8 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0422%4 Jun
cache12–16-0.0220%25 May
inferno10–13-0.0418%25 May
inferno9–30.0429%25 May
mirage10–13-0.0124%20 May
inferno16–140.0324%15 May
mirage13–110.0212%15 May
anubis13–8-0.0332%14 May
mirage11–13-0.0116%14 May
mirage13–60.0931%14 May
cache11–13-0.0216%14 May
mirage13–100.0120%14 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →