SNAXTY

SNAXTY — CS2 Stats

76561198762379179[U:1:802113451]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

628Tracked matches40%Win rate2026Tracked since
965Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,026Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#38186 of 223333 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 788 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Aug 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 12 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,026 +1,331 12 Jul19 Aug · 16 days played
20,94224,173peak 24,17312 Jul19 Aug
24,494Peak Premier in tracked matches
788Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 788
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 113 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,147 below peak (24,173)
  • +629 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,974 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate74.4%45.8%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio2.381.051.06above
Match win rate56.3%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSNAXTYFACEITLevel 7 · 788 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,026 · Pink bandPEAK ELO788csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning47
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility3.8
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.7
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time534ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–2 · poseidon, 18 Aug
47%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · nuke, 11 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · debris, 11 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 16 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

debrisBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC1981142%-0.00
mirageS1913668%0.00
anubisC1771041%-0.00
debrisS118373%0.04
dust2C104640%0.00
infernoD103730%0.01
ancientB63350%-0.01
nuke43175%0.00
poseidon21150%0.15
fachwerk1010%-0.09
train1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,075Lifetime kills
2.38K/D · Top 1% of Level 7 players
1,168Matches
56.3%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 7 players
74.4%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 7 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,168MVPs
406Hours (in match)
1,143Bombs planted
581Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,457
AWP3,564
Knife524
MP9437

Lifetime map wins

2,031dust2
1,399inferno
936nuke
729vertigo
90train
45office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

141Matches
50%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
76.3ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3751%1.2616.8
Anubis2850%1.3215.9
Dust22045%0.9513.8
Cache1747%1.1514.9
Ancient1638%1.1315.9
Inferno989%1.4019.2
Nuke922%0.9512.1
Overpass3100%1.8314.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
537msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
28.6%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
6.61HE damage / grenade
5.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.485 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4471% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–130.0019%4 Sept
anubis13–90.0315%4 Sept
dust26–13-0.0530%4 Sept
cache13–80.0129%26 Aug
cache9–130.0419%21 Aug
dust213–70.1217%21 Aug
dust20–4-0.050%21 Aug
inferno6–130.0322%20 Aug
anubis11–130.0325%20 Aug
debris9–7-0.0233%19 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0612%19 Aug
debris8–8-0.0919%18 Aug
poseidon5–90.0144%18 Aug
poseidon9–20.2944%18 Aug
mirage13–90.0220%13 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0426%12 Aug
cache14–16-0.0424%11 Aug
inferno6–90.0128%11 Aug
debris9–3-0.0126%11 Aug
debris9–10.1419%11 Aug
debris4–9-0.0622%11 Aug
debris9–50.1024%11 Aug
debris9–50.0319%11 Aug
debris9–30.2324%11 Aug
debris9–60.1129%11 Aug
debris6–9-0.0630%11 Aug
debris9–40.1217%11 Aug
nuke9–70.0947%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.0324%11 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0121%11 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0125%10 Aug
cache11–130.0024%10 Aug
dust25–130.0239%10 Aug
cache13–10-0.0118%7 Aug
mirage13–40.1328%6 Aug
fachwerk5–13-0.0926%4 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0143%4 Aug
mirage19–17-0.0321%4 Aug
mirage13–7-0.049%4 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0312%4 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0815%3 Aug
cache7–13-0.0326%3 Aug
mirage13–90.0024%2 Aug
inferno9–130.0211%2 Aug
inferno13–70.0230%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0828%2 Aug
mirage13–30.0418%2 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0321%2 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0614%2 Aug
cache13–80.0516%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0221%2 Aug
dust213–90.0228%1 Aug
inferno6–130.0136%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0222%30 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0120%30 Jul
cache13–80.0316%29 Jul
mirage13–11-0.057%27 Jul
mirage13–110.0415%27 Jul
mirage16–120.0523%27 Jul
cache13–70.0138%27 Jul
mirage6–130.0123%27 Jul
cache8–13-0.0422%26 Jul
inferno11–130.0521%25 Jul
anubis13–70.1023%25 Jul
mirage9–130.0020%25 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0326%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0313%25 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0011%25 Jul
cache11–13-0.0614%25 Jul
dust213–50.0024%25 Jul
ancient13–50.0932%25 Jul
cache5–13-0.100%25 Jul
dust210–130.0138%24 Jul
train5–13-0.0828%24 Jul
ancient13–100.0321%24 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0330%23 Jul
nuke13–80.0318%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0222%20 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0815%20 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0120%20 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0227%20 Jul
anubis13–60.0927%20 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0412%19 Jul
dust29–13-0.0126%18 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0511%17 Jul
cache5–130.0118%17 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0120%17 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0611%17 Jul
cache13–10.1444%16 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0525%16 Jul
ancient4–13-0.1227%15 Jul
cache7–1-0.0622%15 Jul
inferno13–40.0222%15 Jul
anubis11–130.0425%14 Jul
mirage13–80.0129%14 Jul
cache11–13-0.0538%14 Jul
anubis7–130.0322%14 Jul
cache6–13-0.0311%14 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0427%13 Jul
cache13–90.0919%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →