FPS_Panda

FPS_Panda — CS2 Stats

76561199209394187[U:1:1249128459]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,509Tracked matches64%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,249Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,322Top 50% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#50174 of 251136 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,322 +3,336 21 Aug – 8 Oct · 24 days played
18,49622,322peak 22,32221 Aug8 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,094 +0 1 Sept – 9 Sept · 2 observations
1,0941,094peak 1,0941 Sept9 Sept
22,369Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,094Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-08-21

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,322
  • +1,326 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,678 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches114——
Win rate51%——
K/D1.01——
Headshot %47%——

Measured 9 Sep 2026 → 9 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate50.8%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy0.1%11.3%12.0%11.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.110.991.02above
Match win rate46.1%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFPS_PandaFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER22,322 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,094csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning67
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateTLWWTWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 7–1–2 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.4
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time632ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 8–8 · inferno, 1 Sept →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 2 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 2–5 · ancient, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C197–1237%0.00
mirageA1811–761%0.01
ancientB157–847%-0.01
nukeB126–650%0.02
infernoB115–645%0.02
anubisS118–373%0.01
cacheA106–460%0.01
debris—21–150%0.01
vertigo—21–150%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,207Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
1,981Matches
46.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
50.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
4,769MVPs
663Hours (in match)
437Bombs planted
336Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,998dust2
2,279inferno
2,084nuke
998vertigo
442train
184office
27ar_shoots
27ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

172Matches
49%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
76.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4151%0.9815.4
Dust23345%0.9813.4
Anubis3355%0.9513.9
Ancient2756%1.0414.5
Inferno1741%0.7512.5
Cache1136%0.9313.1
Nuke650%0.7513.2
Overpass250%0.8219.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
632msReaction time
60.6%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
15.46HE damage / grenade
9.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–150.0217%8 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0610%8 Oct →
ancient7–20.0614%8 Oct →
dust28–70.0918%8 Oct →
dust212–120.0622%8 Oct →
anubis13–20.058%6 Oct →
mirage13–00.0727%6 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0513%6 Oct →
nuke16–130.0417%5 Oct →
cache13–60.0913%4 Oct →
nuke10–130.0615%30 Sept →
inferno2–130.0333%29 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.084%28 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.089%26 Sept →
mirage13–30.1214%26 Sept →
anubis13–30.1121%26 Sept →
nuke9–130.0810%26 Sept →
mirage13–80.0716%25 Sept →
dust213–11-0.039%25 Sept →
debris9–00.0915%24 Sept →
dust210–130.0116%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0110%23 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0324%22 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0211%22 Sept →
nuke13–20.0412%22 Sept →
cache13–60.0317%22 Sept →
anubis13–60.0723%22 Sept →
ancient13–20.0620%22 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0819%21 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0933%21 Sept →
inferno10–130.1013%20 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.029%20 Sept →
nuke16–140.0523%18 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0119%18 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0517%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.028%16 Sept →
inferno13–80.1118%16 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0517%16 Sept →
cache13–50.0418%16 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.1216%15 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0118%15 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0615%14 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0513%14 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0213%14 Sept →
dust211–130.0215%14 Sept →
ancient2–5-0.0613%13 Sept →
dust213–40.0820%13 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0124%12 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0213%11 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0516%11 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0213%11 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0314%10 Sept →
dust213–40.0012%10 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0112%10 Sept →
dust27–130.0320%9 Sept →
ancient13–110.0416%8 Sept →
nuke13–100.0318%8 Sept →
anubis13–100.0416%8 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0613%8 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0016%6 Sept →
ancient13–60.0619%6 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0128%6 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0020%4 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0612%3 Sept →
mirage13–90.0822%3 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0018%3 Sept →
inferno13–110.0120%2 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0141%2 Sept →
mirage13–20.0229%2 Sept →
inferno8–80.1418%1 Sept →
dust213–110.0314%1 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0429%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.0727%1 Sept →
vertigo7–90.0719%1 Sept →
mirage13–70.0510%1 Sept →
ancient13–60.0618%1 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.038%1 Sept →
debris7–9-0.0611%1 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0016%1 Sept →
ancient11–130.0024%31 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0116%31 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0516%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.0414%29 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0115%28 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0015%28 Aug →
anubis13–60.1127%28 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0117%27 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.006%27 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0620%26 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.069%26 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0212%26 Aug →
inferno13–110.0522%26 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0419%25 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0413%25 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0516%25 Aug →
mirage13–60.0218%23 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0217%23 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0019%23 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0510%22 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0610%21 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.