FPS_Panda

FPS_Panda — CS2 Stats

76561199209394187[U:1:1249128459]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,602Tracked matches56%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,353Hours in CS74Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,112Top 25% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#42305 of 259655 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,112 +4,155 1 Sept – 28 Oct · 19 days played
18,95723,467peak 23,4671 Sept28 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,094 +0 1 Sept – 9 Sept · 2 observations
1,0941,094peak 1,0941 Sept9 Sept
23,467Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,094Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 355 below peak (23,467)
  • +1,469 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,888 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate50.7%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy0.1%12.0%12.4%12.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.021.03above
Match win rate46.1%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFPS_PandaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER23,112 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,094csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning55
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateLLWWTWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.9pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.0
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time615ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 23 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 24 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 2–5 · ancient, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C218–1338%-0.00
anubisA169–756%0.01
nukeC156–940%0.03
mirageB137–654%0.01
ancientB136–746%-0.03
cacheA117–464%0.02
infernoD93–633%0.01
debris—11–0100%0.09
vertigo—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,057Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,082Matches
46.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
50.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
5,021MVPs
704Hours (in match)
486Bombs planted
379Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,394dust2
2,314inferno
2,186nuke
998vertigo
442train
184office
28ar_baggage
27ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

240Matches
48%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
76.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26144%0.9413.7
Mirage5153%0.9915.2
Anubis4949%0.9714.6
Ancient3253%1.0214.6
Inferno1942%0.7712.7
Cache1644%0.8914.1
Nuke850%0.7313.0
Overpass250%0.8219.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
621msReaction time
51.3%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
11.07HE damage / grenade
8.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.395% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0312%3 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.019%2 Nov →
inferno13–60.0111%1 Nov →
dust213–90.0320%1 Nov →
nuke12–12-0.0125%1 Nov →
nuke13–110.0716%1 Nov →
anubis13–9-0.0614%31 Oct →
anubis14–160.069%31 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0310%29 Oct →
anubis11–130.0123%29 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0420%29 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0314%28 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0011%28 Oct →
mirage13–100.0118%27 Oct →
anubis13–40.0224%27 Oct →
nuke1–50.1030%26 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0922%25 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0015%25 Oct →
inferno13–90.0233%24 Oct →
mirage13–30.0621%24 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0713%24 Oct →
nuke5–130.0125%23 Oct →
dust212–120.0214%23 Oct →
cache13–50.1415%23 Oct →
cache13–70.0824%23 Oct →
nuke13–40.1425%23 Oct →
dust29–00.0210%21 Oct →
ancient13–110.0318%20 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0213%20 Oct →
cache13–80.0228%20 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0213%20 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0418%19 Oct →
anubis16–19-0.0113%19 Oct →
inferno1–130.0218%18 Oct →
anubis13–100.0324%18 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0620%18 Oct →
mirage8–130.0420%17 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0711%17 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0116%15 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0612%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0226%14 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0627%13 Oct →
anubis13–50.0521%13 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0216%13 Oct →
mirage14–160.0116%12 Oct →
cache22–19-0.0318%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0417%11 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0526%11 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0113%10 Oct →
ancient15–150.0217%8 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0610%8 Oct →
ancient7–20.0614%8 Oct →
dust28–70.0918%8 Oct →
dust212–120.0622%8 Oct →
anubis13–20.058%6 Oct →
mirage13–00.0727%6 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0513%6 Oct →
nuke16–130.0417%5 Oct →
cache13–60.0913%4 Oct →
nuke10–130.0615%30 Sept →
inferno2–130.0333%29 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.084%28 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.089%26 Sept →
mirage13–30.1214%26 Sept →
anubis13–30.1121%26 Sept →
nuke9–130.0810%26 Sept →
mirage13–80.0716%25 Sept →
dust213–11-0.039%25 Sept →
debris9–00.0915%24 Sept →
dust210–130.0116%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0110%23 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0324%22 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0211%22 Sept →
nuke13–20.0412%22 Sept →
cache13–60.0317%22 Sept →
anubis13–60.0723%22 Sept →
ancient13–20.0620%22 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0819%21 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0933%21 Sept →
inferno10–130.1013%20 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.029%20 Sept →
nuke16–140.0523%18 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0119%18 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0517%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.028%16 Sept →
inferno13–80.1118%16 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0517%16 Sept →
cache13–50.0418%16 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.1216%15 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0118%15 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0615%14 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0513%14 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0213%14 Sept →
dust211–130.0215%14 Sept →
ancient2–5-0.0613%13 Sept →
dust213–40.0820%13 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0124%12 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0213%11 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0516%11 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0213%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.