dNova

dNova — CS2 Stats

US76561198068817494[U:1:108551766]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,221Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,423Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,001Top 50% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82737 of 259274 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Premier CS Rating · 19,999 → 20,001

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,001 +3,144 15 Sept – 1 Nov · 21 days played
16,85720,001peak 20,00115 Sept1 Nov
20,104Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,001
  • +1,204 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,999 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-11-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.9%42.7%43.8%4.9% short
Shot accuracy3.5%11.2%12.0%8.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.000.991.02meets
Match win rate41.5%43.9%44.7%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdNovaFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,001 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning75
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateLLWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.0
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels6.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning7.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels7.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time559ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 10 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · anubis, 6 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · inferno, 30 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 10infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC198–1142%0.02
dust2B178–947%0.03
nukeB137–654%0.04
infernoC135–838%0.02
ancientB105–550%0.03
anubisS108–280%0.07
cacheA95–456%0.02
debris—42–250%0.10
vertigo—20–20%-0.08
poseidon—21–150%0.02
train—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,799Lifetime kills
1.00K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3,505Matches
41.5%Match win rate
38.9%Headshot %
3.5%Shot accuracy
8,283MVPs
1,187Hours (in match)
3,269Bombs planted
1,198Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP19,879
AK-4717,460
MP91,289
MAC-101,190
SSG 081,031
P250736

Lifetime map wins

5,284dust2
3,503inferno
3,133nuke
1,301train
1,105vertigo
408cbble
283office
30lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
42.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
563msReaction time
67.8%T opening success
54.1%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
6.16HE damage / grenade
7.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train8–130.0326%1 Nov →
nuke4–130.0123%1 Nov →
nuke13–90.0117%1 Nov →
nuke13–9-0.0112%31 Oct →
mirage13–80.0413%31 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0114%30 Oct →
dust25–130.0113%30 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0219%30 Oct →
inferno13–100.0926%30 Oct →
cache13–80.0833%29 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0315%28 Oct →
mirage10–130.0221%28 Oct →
mirage10–130.0717%28 Oct →
ancient10–130.0419%28 Oct →
nuke5–130.0315%28 Oct →
mirage13–20.1220%28 Oct →
cache13–70.1117%28 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0610%27 Oct →
nuke13–50.0824%27 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0032%27 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0032%27 Oct →
anubis13–90.0213%26 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0231%25 Oct →
cache5–130.0119%25 Oct →
ancient13–110.0324%25 Oct →
dust28–130.1023%25 Oct →
anubis9–130.0113%24 Oct →
cache13–110.0119%24 Oct →
mirage7–130.0019%24 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0120%24 Oct →
nuke13–110.0822%22 Oct →
dust25–130.0221%22 Oct →
mirage7–130.0624%21 Oct →
dust213–110.0421%17 Oct →
anubis13–70.1046%17 Oct →
dust213–90.0620%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0226%14 Oct →
vertigo2–9-0.1225%10 Oct →
inferno9–00.2833%10 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0736%10 Oct →
mirage13–50.0617%10 Oct →
ancient13–20.0946%10 Oct →
anubis8–130.1425%10 Oct →
mirage8–130.0224%7 Oct →
anubis13–60.1827%7 Oct →
mirage13–50.0624%7 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0411%7 Oct →
anubis13–20.0750%6 Oct →
mirage13–00.0443%6 Oct →
ancient13–30.0433%6 Oct →
poseidon9–50.1630%6 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0138%3 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0138%30 Sept →
dust213–100.1133%30 Sept →
nuke2–130.0223%30 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0530%30 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.069%30 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0218%30 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0320%30 Sept →
dust213–30.0640%30 Sept →
inferno12–120.0113%30 Sept →
inferno3–130.0131%30 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0718%29 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0217%28 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0122%27 Sept →
ancient5–130.0439%26 Sept →
mirage13–30.0218%26 Sept →
anubis13–30.1131%26 Sept →
nuke9–130.0126%26 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0314%25 Sept →
debris9–00.2212%24 Sept →
dust213–90.0610%23 Sept →
inferno16–120.0724%22 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0416%22 Sept →
dust213–70.0633%22 Sept →
dust27–130.0530%22 Sept →
nuke13–20.1217%22 Sept →
cache13–60.0733%22 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.020%22 Sept →
nuke13–20.126%22 Sept →
poseidon2–9-0.1320%22 Sept →
debris5–9-0.076%22 Sept →
debris9–60.1225%22 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0213%21 Sept →
cache10–130.0315%21 Sept →
ancient8–130.0527%19 Sept →
nuke10–130.0225%18 Sept →
anubis13–70.1034%18 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0116%18 Sept →
cache3–13-0.1040%17 Sept →
ancient13–30.0418%17 Sept →
nuke13–100.0133%16 Sept →
inferno13–80.0621%16 Sept →
mirage13–80.0615%16 Sept →
dust29–130.0519%16 Sept →
nuke7–130.0214%16 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0320%16 Sept →
cache7–130.0026%15 Sept →
vertigo3–9-0.0417%15 Sept →
debris5–90.1221%15 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.