Piimä

Piimä — CS2 Stats

FI76561198956639523[U:1:996373795]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,522Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,053Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,090 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,522 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 11 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,561 -956 19 May10 Jun · 2 days played
24,56125,517peak 25,51719 May10 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,090 +0 1 Sept19 Sept · 3 observations
2,0902,090peak 2,0901 Sept19 Sept
25,641Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,090Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-05-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,090
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 410 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches413−9
Win rate50%38%+12pp
K/D1.140.94+0.20
Headshot %32%39%−7pp

Measured 14 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 7 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.1%48.3%51.0%5.8% short
Shot accuracy12.1%13.2%13.7%1.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.071.090.15 short
Match win rate43.5%46.9%48.4%4.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPiimäFACEITLevel 9 · 2,090 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,090csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning52
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46531Last 10046%Win rateLWLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility7.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.2
Utility7.3
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time508ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–0 · inferno, 31 Jul
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · inferno, 31 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 10 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 31 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD1961332%-0.01
infernoD1751229%0.01
ancientC146843%0.03
cacheB137654%0.02
mirageA127558%0.01
anubisS118373%0.03
dust2B105550%0.00
overpass42250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

119,310Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
5,732Matches
43.5%Match win rate
45.1%Headshot %
12.1%Shot accuracy
12,437MVPs
2,773Hours (in match)
6,963Bombs planted
1,344Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,955
AWP9,858
Knife3,031
MP92,525
MAC-101,936

Lifetime map wins

12,557inferno
9,740nuke
6,846dust2
3,290train
2,926vertigo
168cbble
94office
52lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,740Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage31347%1.0014.8
Inferno28649%1.0515.3
Nuke27051%1.1015.8
Dust225549%1.0115.0
Ancient14944%1.1416.6
Anubis9948%1.1315.9
Overpass6354%1.0616.9
Cache3361%1.0715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
502msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
34.6%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
10.16HE damage / grenade
12.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8356% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–13-0.0417%17 Sept
dust213–80.0318%17 Sept
inferno5–130.0917%10 Sept
cache13–100.038%10 Sept
ancient10–130.0712%10 Sept
inferno4–13-0.079%9 Sept
nuke8–13-0.062%9 Sept
inferno13–70.0524%9 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0015%8 Sept
mirage10–130.0420%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.056%1 Sept
ancient13–40.1820%1 Sept
nuke13–100.0517%31 Aug
inferno13–110.0012%31 Aug
anubis13–90.1321%31 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0013%30 Aug
dust26–13-0.0123%30 Aug
ancient8–130.0111%27 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0211%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0117%21 Aug
cache8–130.0113%21 Aug
anubis16–140.0319%21 Aug
ancient19–16-0.0212%20 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0412%20 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0316%20 Aug
nuke13–7-0.028%20 Aug
mirage10–13-0.027%19 Aug
cache9–130.0519%19 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0418%14 Aug
cache16–14-0.0131%12 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0110%12 Aug
inferno13–50.0117%12 Aug
cache13–10.0318%10 Aug
mirage13–110.077%9 Aug
inferno13–00.2131%31 Jul
ancient13–70.0913%31 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0322%30 Jul
mirage14–160.0514%29 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0218%21 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0219%21 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0415%21 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0510%21 Jul
inferno4–13-0.077%21 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0215%20 Jul
nuke13–20.0514%19 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0628%19 Jul
dust213–90.0310%19 Jul
dust210–130.0418%17 Jul
cache5–13-0.0218%17 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0110%17 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0713%16 Jul
ancient13–70.025%7 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0315%7 Jul
anubis13–70.0710%7 Jul
ancient19–22-0.0315%7 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0214%6 Jul
mirage15–150.0411%27 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0310%27 Jun
nuke13–70.0326%17 Jun
ancient11–130.019%17 Jun
dust27–130.0213%17 Jun
nuke4–9-0.200%16 Jun
cache11–13-0.0211%11 Jun
anubis13–100.0712%10 Jun
overpass11–130.0116%10 Jun
inferno9–130.0024%10 Jun
ancient13–30.0913%10 Jun
mirage13–100.0222%10 Jun
cache11–13-0.0411%8 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0525%7 Jun
dust213–10-0.0116%7 Jun
ancient8–130.0424%6 Jun
nuke4–130.0720%6 Jun
inferno8–130.0321%6 Jun
nuke4–130.0118%6 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0218%6 Jun
anubis13–30.0415%1 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0111%31 May
cache13–30.0825%31 May
inferno5–13-0.069%31 May
anubis13–20.1116%31 May
inferno2–13-0.0618%31 May
nuke11–130.0315%28 May
nuke16–19-0.0218%27 May
ancient13–90.0417%24 May
nuke13–110.067%19 May
overpass13–90.0611%19 May
anubis9–13-0.047%19 May
dust213–30.0130%19 May
inferno9–130.0122%19 May
ancient6–130.0013%18 May
inferno13–100.065%18 May
cache13–60.0518%18 May
nuke10–13-0.0314%18 May
nuke13–8-0.0317%13 May
ancient6–130.0222%12 May
overpass13–50.0413%12 May
dust29–13-0.0319%11 May
cache13–60.0418%11 May
cache13–60.077%11 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →