RAUD

RAUD — CS2 Stats

76561198929140716[U:1:968874988]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

367Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
541Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 17 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,481 -779 17 Nov – 6 May · 32 days played
14,99920,118peak 20,11817 Nov6 May
20,118Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2025-11-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning61
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateLLTLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility5.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.3

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time550ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy9.8%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 9.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 18 Mar →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–2 · anubis, 12 Dec →
328msFastest reaction time · 9–5 · inferno, 8 Dec →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 7 Dec →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2916–1355%0.02
infernoA2011–955%-0.00
nukeC146–843%-0.01
ancientB136–746%0.02
overpassA74–357%0.02
anubisD71–614%0.03
dust2S64–267%0.00
poseidon—11–0100%0.00
sanctum—11–0100%0.14
office—10–10%-0.05
agency—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,639Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
2,123Matches
44.0%Match win rate
35.6%Headshot %
11.5%Shot accuracy
5,764MVPs
541Hours (in match)
1,830Bombs planted
393Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,771lake
1,365dust2
1,356nuke
1,209inferno
784cbble
481vertigo
319train
139office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.7%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
551msReaction time
27.4%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
9.60HE damage / grenade
9.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.6808% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.3587% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–13-0.0213%3 Aug →
overpass8–130.1216%6 May →
anubis15–15-0.0215%1 May →
anubis11–13-0.0410%30 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.038%30 Apr →
inferno11–130.0216%19 Mar →
nuke7–130.0410%19 Mar →
ancient13–30.196%18 Mar →
overpass13–2-0.012%18 Mar →
nuke13–90.0115%18 Mar →
nuke13–110.039%4 Mar →
mirage1–10-0.1118%4 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.024%4 Mar →
inferno13–6-0.0410%3 Mar →
anubis8–130.037%2 Mar →
inferno9–4-0.058%1 Mar →
inferno9–70.1114%1 Mar →
inferno9–60.074%1 Mar →
inferno9–60.0514%1 Mar →
nuke10–130.0312%26 Feb →
mirage13–90.0313%23 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.019%23 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.057%23 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.018%22 Feb →
mirage13–160.0310%22 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.049%22 Feb →
inferno13–110.035%22 Feb →
mirage11–130.0413%22 Feb →
ancient16–130.0510%12 Feb →
mirage13–60.098%12 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.069%11 Feb →
nuke9–130.024%11 Feb →
mirage13–110.039%10 Feb →
poseidon9–40.0013%5 Feb →
sanctum9–60.148%5 Feb →
mirage4–130.015%31 Jan →
mirage13–100.025%29 Jan →
mirage13–6-0.035%29 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.0113%26 Jan →
nuke3–13-0.1011%25 Jan →
inferno13–11-0.027%25 Jan →
ancient13–16-0.0310%25 Jan →
dust213–5-0.0113%25 Jan →
mirage9–130.0914%25 Jan →
nuke11–13-0.077%23 Jan →
mirage13–80.0511%23 Jan →
ancient5–130.0413%22 Jan →
inferno11–130.0115%18 Jan →
ancient5–6-0.025%16 Jan →
inferno4–13-0.096%12 Jan →
nuke3–13-0.099%11 Jan →
inferno8–130.016%11 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0314%7 Jan →
mirage13–70.1412%6 Jan →
mirage11–60.069%4 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0213%1 Jan →
inferno13–80.057%28 Dec →
dust213–100.0115%17 Dec →
ancient16–140.0116%17 Dec →
mirage13–9-0.0112%15 Dec →
ancient15–15-0.046%12 Dec →
nuke13–80.0616%12 Dec →
anubis1–2-0.0350%12 Dec →
nuke13–6-0.014%10 Dec →
mirage13–7-0.018%10 Dec →
overpass13–16-0.0310%10 Dec →
inferno13–9-0.044%9 Dec →
mirage13–40.0713%9 Dec →
mirage7–13-0.0711%9 Dec →
nuke9–130.0326%8 Dec →
inferno9–50.0121%8 Dec →
nuke13–10.014%7 Dec →
inferno2–13-0.140%7 Dec →
ancient13–80.0416%7 Dec →
overpass14–16-0.0014%7 Dec →
mirage5–13-0.0318%7 Dec →
mirage13–100.068%7 Dec →
dust29–13-0.0321%29 Nov →
inferno13–110.039%29 Nov →
inferno5–90.0319%29 Nov →
dust213–80.0115%28 Nov →
mirage13–100.0814%26 Nov →
anubis12–120.1413%26 Nov →
overpass13–9-0.0413%26 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0313%25 Nov →
dust213–60.0618%25 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0227%25 Nov →
mirage13–70.0413%24 Nov →
office1–13-0.058%23 Nov →
anubis13–70.039%23 Nov →
overpass13–90.0218%20 Nov →
mirage13–70.0118%20 Nov →
nuke13–80.0012%19 Nov →
ancient7–130.0516%19 Nov →
anubis11–130.1216%19 Nov →
agency6–10-0.0429%19 Nov →
mirage13–70.0310%18 Nov →
overpass13–50.098%18 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0111%17 Nov →
mirage2–80.0422%17 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →