SHARPNESS

SHARPNESS — CS2 Stats

EE76561199046774160[U:1:1086508432]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

830Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
726Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,142 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,142 → 1,142
+3Tracked matches · now 830
0.0ppWin rate · 44.8% → 44.8%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,958 -2,042 17 Mar – 11 Jun · 33 days played
12,50015,000peak 15,00017 Mar11 Jun
15,000Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,142Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-03-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,142
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches4——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.93——
Headshot %42%——

Measured 24 Sep 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.6%43.8%44.8%4.2% short
Shot accuracy3.0%12.0%12.4%9.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.021.03above
Match win rate47.7%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSHARPNESSFACEITLevel 5 · 1,142 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,142csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning67
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateLWWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.9
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels6.3
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.7
Utility4.9
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time564ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–6 · inferno, 27 Mar →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · poseidon, 10 Apr →
344msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · poseidon, 10 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 24 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 32% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2211–1150%0.01
nukeD227–1532%0.02
infernoB168–850%0.04
ancientA85–363%0.03
poseidonB84–450%0.01
dust2A74–357%0.00
overpassC52–340%-0.01
vertigo—42–250%0.01
anubis—41–325%-0.00
cache—32–167%-0.00
warden—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,442Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,132Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
40.6%Headshot %
3.0%Shot accuracy
6,120MVPs
726Hours (in match)
1,394Bombs planted
510Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,184inferno
3,134nuke
2,445vertigo
1,523dust2
400train
66office
42cbble
27lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

14Matches
64%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
96.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno367%1.5521.7
Mirage367%1.0013.7
Nuke2100%1.4217.0
Anubis250%1.4819.0
Dust2250%0.9913.5
Train1100%1.3312.0
Ancient10%1.0520.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
548msReaction time
52.8%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.73HE damage / grenade
6.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–16-0.077%2 Oct →
mirage13–100.0215%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0334%1 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0624%10 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0214%7 Sept →
nuke13–100.0422%6 Sept →
mirage13–30.0018%5 Sept →
ancient13–100.0514%30 Aug →
inferno8–130.0620%30 Aug →
inferno13–90.1517%11 Jun →
ancient13–100.0818%10 Jun →
nuke9–130.0119%10 Jun →
nuke12–160.0832%9 Jun →
vertigo8–8-0.0819%25 May →
inferno2–9-0.0625%22 May →
cache13–90.0522%22 May →
dust213–10-0.0329%20 May →
nuke3–13-0.0528%18 May →
nuke10–130.0211%12 May →
mirage13–90.0711%12 May →
nuke5–9-0.073%11 May →
ancient5–13-0.0513%7 May →
dust20–13-0.0519%7 May →
overpass8–130.0216%6 May →
nuke7–130.0519%6 May →
nuke13–50.1416%6 May →
ancient16–140.1720%5 May →
mirage13–50.0714%5 May →
nuke8–130.0215%4 May →
mirage8–130.0217%3 May →
inferno8–130.0010%2 May →
cache12–12-0.0727%2 May →
overpass9–130.0222%2 May →
nuke13–3-0.0417%1 May →
cache13–90.008%29 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.077%27 Apr →
inferno13–50.0126%26 Apr →
ancient13–80.1128%26 Apr →
overpass13–90.0020%24 Apr →
dust210–13-0.057%22 Apr →
nuke13–60.0823%22 Apr →
inferno8–130.0317%21 Apr →
vertigo7–9-0.1617%19 Apr →
mirage13–100.0427%15 Apr →
inferno7–90.0645%15 Apr →
poseidon4–90.0513%15 Apr →
nuke15–15-0.0221%14 Apr →
nuke4–9-0.0312%11 Apr →
poseidon9–50.0323%11 Apr →
inferno9–30.1023%11 Apr →
vertigo9–50.078%10 Apr →
mirage9–9-0.0015%10 Apr →
mirage13–100.0318%10 Apr →
poseidon9–50.147%10 Apr →
poseidon4–9-0.0757%10 Apr →
poseidon9–60.1813%10 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0318%10 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0119%9 Apr →
dust213–90.0517%8 Apr →
poseidon6–9-0.0623%1 Apr →
inferno13–30.0420%1 Apr →
anubis13–60.0716%1 Apr →
mirage7–130.0418%1 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0437%31 Mar →
inferno7–9-0.0514%29 Mar →
inferno9–70.0329%29 Mar →
inferno13–80.0914%28 Mar →
nuke13–20.1124%28 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0327%28 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.0012%27 Mar →
inferno13–5-0.0221%27 Mar →
overpass13–11-0.0018%27 Mar →
mirage16–14-0.0926%27 Mar →
inferno9–60.2923%27 Mar →
mirage10–130.0320%26 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0818%26 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0010%26 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0610%26 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0726%25 Mar →
nuke13–40.0115%25 Mar →
dust213–30.1421%25 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.0015%25 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.0228%24 Mar →
nuke8–80.0125%24 Mar →
vertigo9–10.2242%24 Mar →
ancient13–1-0.0230%24 Mar →
mirage10–130.0225%24 Mar →
poseidon1–9-0.166%24 Mar →
poseidon9–4-0.0221%24 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0415%24 Mar →
mirage13–20.1218%24 Mar →
inferno5–9-0.094%24 Mar →
ancient1–13-0.1031%23 Mar →
mirage16–130.0614%23 Mar →
mirage13–110.0110%21 Mar →
nuke8–130.0622%19 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0617%19 Mar →
nuke13–100.0826%18 Mar →
warden2–130.0319%18 Mar →
mirage5–130.1322%17 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.