SHARPNESS

SHARPNESS — CS2 Stats

EE76561199046774160[U:1:1086508432]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

827Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,501Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidOpening Duellist
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,142 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 13 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,958 -2,050 13 Mar11 Jun · 35 days played
12,50015,008peak 15,00813 Mar11 Jun
15,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,142Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-03-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,142
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.5%43.8%44.8%4.2% short
Shot accuracy3.0%12.0%12.5%9.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.021.03above
Match win rate47.7%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSHARPNESSFACEITLevel 5 · 1,142 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,142csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning67
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateLLWWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening DuellistWinning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+2.7 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim7.6
Utility4.7
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels7.4
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time585ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–6 · inferno, 27 Mar
57%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · poseidon, 10 Apr
344msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · poseidon, 10 Apr
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 24 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD2271532%0.02
mirageB21101148%0.01
infernoB168850%0.04
ancientA85363%0.03
poseidonB84450%0.01
overpassC73443%-0.00
dust2A53260%0.01
anubisD51420%-0.01
vertigo42250%0.01
cache32167%-0.00
warden1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,366Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,128Matches
47.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
40.5%Headshot %
3.0%Shot accuracy
6,117MVPs
725Hours (in match)
1,394Bombs planted
509Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,184inferno
3,134nuke
2,445vertigo
1,498dust2
400train
66office
42cbble
27lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

14Matches
64%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
96.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage367%1.0013.7
Inferno367%1.5521.7
Nuke2100%1.4217.0
Anubis250%1.4819.0
Dust2250%0.9913.5
Train1100%1.3312.0
Ancient10%1.0520.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
571msReaction time
50.9%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.36HE damage / grenade
6.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4363 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–13-0.0624%10 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0214%7 Sept
nuke13–100.0422%6 Sept
mirage13–30.0018%5 Sept
ancient13–100.0514%30 Aug
inferno8–130.0620%30 Aug
inferno13–90.1517%11 Jun
ancient13–100.0818%10 Jun
nuke9–130.0119%10 Jun
nuke12–160.0832%9 Jun
vertigo8–8-0.0819%25 May
inferno2–9-0.0625%22 May
cache13–90.0522%22 May
dust213–10-0.0329%20 May
nuke3–13-0.0528%18 May
nuke10–130.0211%12 May
mirage13–90.0711%12 May
nuke5–9-0.073%11 May
ancient5–13-0.0513%7 May
dust20–13-0.0519%7 May
overpass8–130.0216%6 May
nuke7–130.0519%6 May
nuke13–50.1416%6 May
ancient16–140.1720%5 May
mirage13–50.0714%5 May
nuke8–130.0215%4 May
mirage8–130.0217%3 May
inferno8–130.0010%2 May
cache12–12-0.0727%2 May
overpass9–130.0222%2 May
nuke13–3-0.0417%1 May
cache13–90.008%29 Apr
overpass7–13-0.077%27 Apr
inferno13–50.0126%26 Apr
ancient13–80.1128%26 Apr
overpass13–90.0020%24 Apr
dust210–13-0.057%22 Apr
nuke13–60.0823%22 Apr
inferno8–130.0317%21 Apr
vertigo7–9-0.1617%19 Apr
mirage13–100.0427%15 Apr
inferno7–90.0645%15 Apr
poseidon4–90.0513%15 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0221%14 Apr
nuke4–9-0.0312%11 Apr
poseidon9–50.0323%11 Apr
inferno9–30.1023%11 Apr
vertigo9–50.078%10 Apr
mirage9–9-0.0015%10 Apr
mirage13–100.0318%10 Apr
poseidon9–50.147%10 Apr
poseidon4–9-0.0757%10 Apr
poseidon9–60.1813%10 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0318%10 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0119%9 Apr
dust213–90.0517%8 Apr
poseidon6–9-0.0623%1 Apr
inferno13–30.0420%1 Apr
anubis13–60.0716%1 Apr
mirage7–130.0418%1 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0437%31 Mar
inferno7–9-0.0514%29 Mar
inferno9–70.0329%29 Mar
inferno13–80.0914%28 Mar
nuke13–20.1124%28 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0327%28 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0012%27 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0221%27 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0018%27 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0926%27 Mar
inferno9–60.2923%27 Mar
mirage10–130.0320%26 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0818%26 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0010%26 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0610%26 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0726%25 Mar
nuke13–40.0115%25 Mar
dust213–30.1421%25 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0015%25 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0228%24 Mar
nuke8–80.0125%24 Mar
vertigo9–10.2242%24 Mar
ancient13–1-0.0230%24 Mar
mirage10–130.0225%24 Mar
poseidon1–9-0.166%24 Mar
poseidon9–4-0.0221%24 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0415%24 Mar
mirage13–20.1218%24 Mar
inferno5–9-0.094%24 Mar
ancient1–13-0.1031%23 Mar
mirage16–130.0614%23 Mar
mirage13–110.0110%21 Mar
nuke8–130.0622%19 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0617%19 Mar
nuke13–100.0826%18 Mar
warden2–130.0319%18 Mar
mirage5–130.1322%17 Mar
overpass13–100.016%17 Mar
anubis2–13-0.056%16 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0120%13 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →