Ar2n

Ar2n — CS2 Stats

EE76561198366930867[U:1:406665139]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

320Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
766Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#19021 of 241957 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,058 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 13 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,110 +3,276 13 Mar7 Jun · 37 days played
19,00625,110peak 25,11013 Mar7 Jun
25,110Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,058Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-03-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,058
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 143 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,280), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate36.8%45.7%46.8%10.0% short
Shot accuracy17.7%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.221.051.06above
Match win rate47.0%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAr2nFACEITLevel 7 · 1,058 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,058csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning41
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateLLLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +8.8pp headshot accuracy · +59ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.3
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time622ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–5 · poseidon, 13 Mar
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · mirage, 20 Apr
414msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 19 May
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 21 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29151452%0.03
infernoD2171433%0.01
nukeB178947%0.01
ancientA116555%0.03
dust2B84450%0.00
cacheS54180%0.01
overpassS54180%0.02
anubis21150%-0.01
office1010%0.12
poseidon110100%0.19

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,334Lifetime kills
1.22K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
2,253Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
36.8%Headshot %
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
8,185MVPs
766Hours (in match)
1,838Bombs planted
1,173Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,150inferno
1,690dust2
1,201nuke
491train
479cbble
306vertigo
102lake
92office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

152Matches
55%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
83.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1850%1.6416.7
Dust26100%1.2614.0
Inferno580%1.0417.0
Anubis475%1.5416.5
Cache475%1.1215.5
Ancient250%1.1218.0
Train1100%2.2518.0
Nuke1100%1.2123.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
609msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
11.79HE damage / grenade
8.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.5012% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0117%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0416%17 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0920%12 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0122%12 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0126%11 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0032%9 Aug
dust20–7-0.0550%9 Aug
mirage11–130.0124%9 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0416%8 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0020%8 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0613%7 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0018%7 Aug
cache13–1-0.022%7 Aug
mirage13–90.0015%6 Aug
cache13–100.0520%31 Jul
cache13–20.0320%28 Jul
dust24–13-0.0029%3 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0810%13 Jun
ancient13–70.0411%7 Jun
overpass13–4-0.0015%7 Jun
cache13–11-0.039%6 Jun
ancient13–10.1118%6 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0215%5 Jun
mirage13–90.0412%5 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0328%31 May
overpass13–110.1022%31 May
mirage13–80.0518%28 May
inferno10–13-0.0512%28 May
inferno13–7-0.0421%28 May
ancient13–7-0.0117%21 May
dust213–00.0125%21 May
cache10–130.0114%19 May
inferno13–80.0215%19 May
ancient2–13-0.0410%19 May
mirage13–70.0319%19 May
mirage9–130.0023%19 May
inferno2–13-0.0311%17 May
nuke13–8-0.0711%17 May
mirage9–130.0617%17 May
nuke13–30.0326%16 May
inferno13–10-0.064%16 May
nuke10–130.0716%12 May
mirage5–130.0814%12 May
mirage13–90.1813%12 May
nuke16–140.0327%11 May
mirage13–50.1418%8 May
mirage7–13-0.0218%8 May
ancient13–90.0719%7 May
inferno13–40.0920%7 May
overpass13–8-0.0223%3 May
nuke13–80.0223%3 May
nuke16–140.0922%27 Apr
nuke8–130.0618%27 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0114%27 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0220%27 Apr
dust23–13-0.0715%27 Apr
dust213–70.1024%24 Apr
mirage7–1-0.0011%24 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0119%23 Apr
nuke13–60.0717%22 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0413%21 Apr
ancient13–70.1028%20 Apr
mirage2–00.15100%20 Apr
mirage15–150.0314%19 Apr
dust213–70.0314%18 Apr
mirage13–50.0921%18 Apr
ancient6–130.0311%18 Apr
inferno9–130.0526%18 Apr
anubis12–16-0.0315%17 Apr
ancient10–130.0326%17 Apr
inferno13–100.0213%16 Apr
mirage13–100.0823%15 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0121%12 Apr
nuke14–160.0313%12 Apr
mirage8–130.0126%9 Apr
mirage9–130.0321%8 Apr
anubis13–50.0119%8 Apr
mirage6–130.0718%3 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0411%2 Apr
overpass13–110.0026%27 Mar
mirage8–130.0411%26 Mar
inferno9–130.0513%26 Mar
ancient6–130.0816%26 Mar
dust213–30.1012%25 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0012%25 Mar
inferno9–130.0823%22 Mar
mirage6–130.0118%22 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0011%19 Mar
mirage11–130.0115%19 Mar
inferno11–130.0618%19 Mar
inferno8–8-0.0013%15 Mar
inferno9–30.1615%15 Mar
inferno7–130.0215%15 Mar
dust26–13-0.1019%15 Mar
office12–120.1217%14 Mar
inferno1–130.0315%14 Mar
poseidon9–50.1915%13 Mar
inferno8–8-0.0514%13 Mar
overpass10–130.0113%13 Mar
inferno5–130.0017%13 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →