P1mple

P1mple — CS2 Stats

EE76561199888045495[U:1:1927779767]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

130Tracked matches47%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating7,760Light Blue band · top ~65.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 May 2026 (163 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,760 +2,055 1 Mar – 17 May · 29 days played
5,7058,956peak 8,9561 Mar17 May
9,068Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2025-12-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,196 below peak (8,956)
  • -1,196 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,055 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 2,240 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGP1mplePREMIER7,760 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning49
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateWLLWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.5
Utility4.6
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels4.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.9
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time610ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–2 · vertigo, 8 Apr →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · anubis, 10 Feb →
281msFastest reaction time · 1–2 · anubis, 12 Dec →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 1 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16infernoWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC219–1243%0.03
mirageB2010–1050%0.03
infernoD165–1131%0.01
ancientA1610–663%0.04
anubisA148–657%0.02
vertigoA53–260%0.05
dust2—43–175%0.02
overpass—21–150%0.06
cache—11–0100%0.01
office—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
617msReaction time
44.9%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
6.71HE damage / grenade
5.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0121%18 May →
office3–13-0.0021%18 May →
inferno2–13-0.0412%17 May →
anubis13–90.0311%17 May →
nuke13–110.0239%13 May →
nuke13–10.0744%10 May →
nuke3–10-0.0419%9 May →
ancient13–40.0826%9 May →
mirage4–13-0.0512%8 May →
inferno0–13-0.0816%8 May →
inferno3–13-0.060%7 May →
dust27–13-0.0427%2 May →
dust213–50.0520%30 Apr →
overpass10–130.0222%30 Apr →
nuke11–130.0819%30 Apr →
nuke16–14-0.0119%27 Apr →
nuke8–130.0026%27 Apr →
mirage13–10.0014%24 Apr →
inferno12–160.0825%23 Apr →
ancient5–130.0217%23 Apr →
anubis3–13-0.0620%23 Apr →
vertigo8–13-0.0014%23 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0824%16 Apr →
mirage13–100.0726%16 Apr →
mirage13–50.0516%16 Apr →
inferno3–9-0.118%16 Apr →
overpass13–110.1116%10 Apr →
mirage9–130.0519%8 Apr →
anubis13–50.138%8 Apr →
vertigo9–5-0.0129%8 Apr →
vertigo9–20.1843%8 Apr →
inferno13–30.1122%1 Apr →
anubis13–6-0.0710%1 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.079%1 Apr →
ancient3–130.0132%31 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0340%31 Mar →
anubis8–130.0422%25 Mar →
mirage13–80.1414%23 Mar →
dust24–10.0233%23 Mar →
ancient13–30.0310%22 Mar →
anubis13–90.0316%22 Mar →
inferno13–80.0731%19 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.0317%19 Mar →
mirage10–130.0222%15 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0515%13 Mar →
ancient13–100.1516%13 Mar →
nuke7–130.0224%11 Mar →
nuke8–130.0813%11 Mar →
inferno15–150.1113%11 Mar →
anubis12–120.0117%10 Mar →
ancient13–110.0519%8 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0216%6 Mar →
nuke13–40.1129%6 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0315%4 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.039%4 Mar →
mirage7–130.0123%3 Mar →
anubis9–130.0314%3 Mar →
nuke13–50.0413%2 Mar →
anubis10–20.027%2 Mar →
mirage13–50.1215%2 Mar →
inferno13–40.1123%2 Mar →
ancient13–60.1412%2 Mar →
ancient13–00.0318%1 Mar →
nuke13–40.1819%1 Mar →
mirage4–130.0620%1 Mar →
mirage13–90.0914%1 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.039%27 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0019%27 Feb →
mirage13–50.1518%27 Feb →
inferno4–130.0123%27 Feb →
ancient13–7-0.004%26 Feb →
anubis5–130.0716%18 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0316%13 Feb →
nuke11–130.0530%13 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.0050%10 Feb →
nuke13–1-0.0511%10 Feb →
mirage13–50.0918%30 Jan →
vertigo8–13-0.0633%29 Jan →
anubis13–8-0.018%29 Jan →
dust213–40.0523%26 Jan →
anubis13–5-0.0121%26 Jan →
mirage13–110.0216%23 Jan →
nuke13–20.1215%23 Jan →
ancient5–13-0.0411%22 Jan →
nuke13–80.0214%22 Jan →
mirage3–13-0.1030%19 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.069%18 Jan →
nuke7–130.0816%18 Jan →
ancient13–40.1230%18 Jan →
inferno13–30.1633%18 Jan →
ancient5–6-0.0315%16 Jan →
ancient13–110.1116%13 Jan →
nuke3–130.0220%11 Jan →
inferno8–130.0112%11 Jan →
vertigo13–60.1516%18 Dec →
mirage13–00.0516%18 Dec →
ancient8–60.0316%18 Dec →
nuke11–13-0.0216%18 Dec →
anubis1–20.1233%12 Dec →
inferno9–6-0.0115%11 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.