Mooxi

Mooxi — CS2 Stats

IM76561198865732437[U:1:905466709]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

708Tracked matches82%Win rate2023Tracked since
864Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate48.3%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy4.0%12.2%11.2%7.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.290.980.99above
Match win rate51.5%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMooxiFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning80
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY69–26–5Last 10069%Win rateLWWWLWTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 14–5–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.2
Positioning8.0
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning8.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels8.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time535ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 13–5 · office, 30 Jul →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · office, 10 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–8 · inferno, 16 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 13 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 89% over 9infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2717–1063%0.06
officeS2215–768%0.09
vertigoS98–189%0.10
infernoC83–538%0.03
mirageS76–186%0.08
trainS65–183%0.04
dust2S64–267%0.07
ancientS64–267%0.03
anubis—33–0100%0.08
overpass—32–167%0.05
debris—10–10%0.01
italy—11–0100%-0.03
cache—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,381Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 10% of Level 3 players
2,387Matches
51.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 3 players
48.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
4.0%Shot accuracy
4,959MVPs
864Hours (in match)
873Bombs planted
235Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,469office
2,408italy
2,112nuke
1,849dust2
1,333inferno
798vertigo
461train
40safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

55Matches
42%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
101.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1127%1.0015.6
Anubis1040%1.2419.3
Vertigo1060%1.3519.3
Overpass650%1.3619.7
Inferno520%1.1922.2
Ancient450%1.6218.0
Nuke20%1.1717.0
Thera1100%0.7710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
531msReaction time
65.3%T opening success
63.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
6.42HE damage / grenade
6.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.491 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–9-0.0629%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0429%16 Oct →
mirage13–70.1426%16 Oct →
train13–80.0920%16 Oct →
debris7–90.0118%16 Oct →
nuke9–40.2321%16 Oct →
inferno8–80.1033%16 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.1219%16 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0334%16 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0118%16 Oct →
italy13–2-0.0319%16 Oct →
mirage13–100.2126%16 Oct →
dust213–70.0220%16 Oct →
vertigo4–10.0544%16 Oct →
ancient13–80.0617%15 Oct →
office13–30.0122%15 Oct →
anubis13–100.1529%15 Oct →
inferno13–50.1236%15 Oct →
dust213–30.0417%15 Oct →
office13–100.0925%15 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0117%13 Oct →
train13–110.0220%13 Oct →
mirage13–80.1125%13 Oct →
dust213–20.1413%13 Oct →
office12–120.0830%13 Oct →
nuke13–30.1221%13 Oct →
office10–130.0619%12 Oct →
nuke13–110.1025%11 Oct →
inferno13–30.0628%11 Oct →
office13–40.0625%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.1323%11 Oct →
mirage13–40.0329%11 Oct →
dust213–110.2119%11 Oct →
vertigo12–120.1019%11 Oct →
office13–30.0747%10 Oct →
nuke13–70.1028%10 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0725%9 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0022%9 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0426%9 Oct →
nuke13–50.1328%9 Oct →
office13–20.2730%9 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0225%6 Oct →
nuke5–130.0226%6 Oct →
overpass13–40.1022%9 Sept →
office13–20.1323%9 Sept →
overpass3–130.0030%4 Sept →
office13–40.1028%4 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0719%27 Aug →
vertigo13–80.0632%26 Aug →
vertigo13–30.1617%26 Aug →
mirage13–100.1314%22 Aug →
office13–40.0729%22 Aug →
nuke10–130.0516%22 Aug →
nuke10–130.0817%20 Aug →
ancient1–7-0.140%19 Aug →
nuke13–80.1322%19 Aug →
office13–70.0130%19 Aug →
office9–130.0413%18 Aug →
vertigo13–110.1817%17 Aug →
nuke13–40.2122%17 Aug →
nuke13–70.0629%17 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0414%17 Aug →
nuke7–130.0415%16 Aug →
office13–30.0513%16 Aug →
nuke10–20.0419%16 Aug →
nuke5–130.0019%16 Aug →
nuke13–110.0616%16 Aug →
nuke13–60.0220%16 Aug →
nuke13–20.1524%7 Aug →
office13–50.0230%7 Aug →
office13–100.0721%7 Aug →
office13–50.2722%30 Jul →
overpass13–90.0617%27 Jul →
train13–60.0415%21 Jul →
nuke13–110.0825%17 Jul →
nuke13–30.0323%17 Jul →
nuke9–130.0236%5 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0625%5 Apr →
office10–13-0.0245%12 Mar →
office13–50.1418%12 Mar →
nuke4–130.0521%12 Mar →
nuke13–100.0320%18 Feb →
office7–130.1111%18 Feb →
train13–80.0423%13 Feb →
nuke13–80.0520%13 Feb →
office11–130.1523%13 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.0019%13 Feb →
inferno13–10.1014%13 Feb →
ancient13–40.1422%13 Feb →
inferno10–130.0518%13 Feb →
train13–20.0415%13 Feb →
dust211–130.0634%13 Feb →
office9–130.1518%13 Feb →
anubis13–90.0925%13 Feb →
train12–12-0.0112%12 Feb →
ancient13–50.0119%12 Feb →
vertigo13–50.1018%11 Feb →
office13–50.0726%11 Feb →
vertigo13–60.1336%11 Feb →
inferno12–120.0018%11 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.