A. Memory — CS2 Stats

GD76561198963343915[U:1:1003078187]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,297Tracked matches46%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,205Hours in CS

CSDB Rating3.1 Learning

Premier CS Rating8,606Light Blue band · top ~61.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19776 of 26486 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	41.2%	42.5%	44.2%	3.0% short
Shot accuracy	0.0%	10.9%	11.2%	11.2% short
Kill/death ratio	0.84	0.99	1.04	0.19 short
Match win rate	46.7%	44.2%	45.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52

Positioning36

Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–52–6Last 10042%Win rateWWWWLLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2

Aggression3.4

Utility1.8

Positioning3.6

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2

Positioning3.6

Utility1.8

Mechanics3.7

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact3.8

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time636ms−24ms

first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms

Headshot accuracy15.4%−1.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–0

13–0Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

W4Current streak

3–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 20nukeWeakest map · 32% over 31

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	D	31	10–21	32%	-0.02
mirage	S	20	13–7	65%	-0.03
cache	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.05
office	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
dust2	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.03
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.03
inferno	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.07
ancient	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.04
shelter	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
train	—	2	0–2	0%	0.02
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,905Lifetime kills

0.84K/D

3,014Matches

46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players

41.2%Headshot %

0.0%Shot accuracy

5,399MVPs

1,205Hours (in match)

2,712Bombs planted

519Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,308

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,965

AWP3,126

P2000 / USP-S2,618

MP92,441

MAC-102,377

Glock-182,283

Desert Eagle1,991

MP71,044

Five-SeveN791

Lifetime map wins

6,818nuke

3,891dust2

3,089office

3,075vertigo

2,829inferno

1,282train

81italy

1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches

55%Win rate

0.66Avg K/D

63.9ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	4	75%	0.65	10.0
Dust2	4	75%	0.70	10.5
Ancient	2	0%	0.44	8.0
Overpass	1	0%	1.05	22.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy

38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.0%Spray accuracy

66.5%Counter-strafing

11.3°Preaim

639msReaction time

28.5%T opening success

26.8%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

0.00HE damage / grenade

3.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.6402% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4807 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.4902% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–3	-0.08	9%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.04	9%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–0	0.13	18%	28 Aug →
shelter	13–7	-0.04	12%	28 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	13%	28 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.00	25%	28 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	15%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	16%	28 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.07	9%	27 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.05	10%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.09	14%	27 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	2%	27 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.05	22%	27 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	-0.01	13%	27 Aug →
train	5–13	0.02	13%	27 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	19%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	29%	27 Aug →
boulder	13–8	-0.03	24%	27 Aug →
italy	2–13	-0.04	23%	27 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.03	22%	26 Aug →
office	3–13	-0.03	6%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	10%	26 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.09	8%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	10%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	15%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	11%	26 Aug →
nuke	5–0	0.00	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	12%	26 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.04	19%	26 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.09	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	7–9	-0.14	14%	25 Aug →
office	10–13	-0.06	36%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	21%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.07	32%	25 Aug →
office	13–9	-0.02	28%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	17%	25 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.05	20%	25 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	14%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.08	23%	24 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	18%	24 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	15%	24 Aug →
inferno	0–7	-0.03	0%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	15%	24 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.14	24%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.07	8%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	10%	24 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.01	13%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.00	24%	24 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	24%	24 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	10%	24 Aug →
nuke	12–5	0.01	27%	24 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.00	22%	24 Aug →
nuke	9–5	-0.05	32%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.07	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	2–10	-0.05	0%	23 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.07	16%	23 Aug →
office	13–9	0.00	21%	23 Aug →
office	10–13	0.07	15%	23 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.10	17%	23 Aug →
office	8–13	-0.04	10%	23 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.06	19%	23 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	14%	23 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	28%	23 Aug →
train	1–13	0.02	35%	23 Aug →
shelter	4–13	-0.01	21%	22 Aug →
ancient	1–10	-0.04	12%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	15%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	13%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.01	11%	22 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	19%	22 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.11	5%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	9%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.08	12%	21 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	24%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	21%	21 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.08	33%	21 Aug →
office	4–13	0.02	7%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	17%	21 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.12	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	15%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	25%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.07	29%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	19%	20 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.02	15%	20 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.01	26%	20 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	10%	19 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.13	8%	19 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.01	21%	19 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	12%	19 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	15%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	9%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.08	13%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.09	14%	19 Aug →
office	13–7	0.04	20%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	12%	18 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	13%	18 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.08	25%	18 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	27%	18 Aug →