Jyke "Esimies" Reimanen

Jyke "Esimies" Reimanen — CS2 Stats

76561198858118981[U:1:897853253]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

903Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,653Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#49168 of 221444 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 13 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,017 +583 15 Feb5 Jul · 23 days played
21,40724,401peak 24,40115 Feb5 Jul
24,806Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-02-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,040), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate39.9%44.9%45.8%5.9% short
Shot accuracy16.1%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.041.05above
Match win rate45.3%45.3%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJyke "Esimies" ReimanenFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning48
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44515Last 10044%Win rateLLWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.2
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.8
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time561ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 13 Feb
42%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · nuke, 17 Mar
344msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 31 Aug
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 15 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 36% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2591636%0.01
nukeC2491538%0.02
ancientC167944%0.01
infernoB168850%-0.02
anubisA95456%0.00
overpassS54180%-0.02
dust242250%0.06
vertigo1010%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,629Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
3,106Matches
45.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
39.9%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
6,855MVPs
1,308Hours (in match)
3,240Bombs planted
979Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,187
AWP5,841
FAMAS1,703
MAC-101,378
MP91,072

Lifetime map wins

4,445nuke
4,278inferno
2,361vertigo
2,230train
1,152dust2
82cbble
77office
51lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
82.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7745%1.1716.3
Nuke3951%1.1917.9
Vertigo2857%1.2516.8
Anubis1540%1.1416.1
Ancient1242%0.9215.0
Inferno1182%1.5116.4
Train667%1.2217.5
Dust2650%0.8112.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
561msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
7.25HE damage / grenade
3.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.1937 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7979% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0919%5 Sept
dust23–130.0019%31 Aug
dust213–7-0.0124%31 Aug
nuke5–13-0.046%31 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0216%28 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0217%28 Aug
nuke13–40.0416%28 Aug
mirage9–130.0117%28 Aug
nuke6–130.0713%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0312%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0312%23 Aug
ancient5–130.0413%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0138%5 Jul
nuke13–160.0227%5 Jul
nuke13–50.0416%5 Jul
ancient13–110.0420%4 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0110%4 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0227%4 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0318%4 Jul
ancient10–130.0114%28 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0714%28 Jun
ancient13–110.009%16 May
mirage4–13-0.0514%16 May
inferno9–13-0.0310%16 May
inferno13–6-0.026%16 May
ancient13–4-0.008%16 May
nuke13–80.0116%16 May
ancient13–160.0210%9 May
nuke8–130.0213%9 May
nuke3–13-0.0916%9 May
inferno9–13-0.0012%27 Apr
ancient13–80.048%27 Apr
overpass13–80.0111%27 Apr
anubis11–130.026%25 Apr
mirage13–30.1112%25 Apr
mirage2–130.0224%25 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0619%24 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0413%24 Apr
inferno4–13-0.018%24 Apr
anubis13–70.1118%24 Apr
overpass5–13-0.076%24 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0017%22 Apr
nuke7–130.0125%22 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0319%17 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0510%17 Apr
nuke16–140.0315%17 Apr
ancient13–50.0912%17 Apr
ancient11–13-0.078%17 Apr
inferno9–130.0113%17 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0219%17 Apr
overpass13–70.0121%6 Apr
inferno13–80.0322%6 Apr
inferno13–7-0.018%6 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0319%2 Apr
inferno4–130.0520%2 Apr
ancient7–13-0.029%2 Apr
nuke16–130.0618%30 Mar
mirage11–130.0621%22 Mar
dust27–130.0621%22 Mar
overpass13–80.0110%22 Mar
inferno1–13-0.0312%22 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0022%19 Mar
nuke9–130.0812%19 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0314%17 Mar
mirage13–100.0320%17 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0042%17 Mar
ancient11–130.0217%7 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0216%7 Mar
mirage15–15-0.016%3 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0715%28 Feb
inferno13–10-0.069%28 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0418%28 Feb
inferno4–13-0.146%28 Feb
nuke13–60.1228%28 Feb
anubis15–15-0.078%27 Feb
ancient8–13-0.079%27 Feb
nuke13–30.0816%27 Feb
nuke13–60.048%27 Feb
mirage7–130.0422%27 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0213%27 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0313%27 Feb
ancient13–60.0011%27 Feb
anubis10–130.0315%24 Feb
mirage13–40.0718%24 Feb
mirage6–20.0523%24 Feb
nuke13–90.0717%24 Feb
anubis13–7-0.029%23 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0210%23 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0513%21 Feb
ancient13–40.0410%21 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0114%17 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0318%17 Feb
nuke13–160.0319%15 Feb
mirage13–100.0216%15 Feb
anubis13–20.0214%15 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0224%15 Feb
nuke8–130.0510%15 Feb
mirage13–60.0720%15 Feb
vertigo9–130.1021%13 Feb
dust213–60.1715%13 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →