Kelm1

Kelm1 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198380623564[U:1:420357836]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,931Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,044Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating19,364Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#91327 of 251637 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,364 -230 29 Mar – 4 Oct · 13 days played
17,46320,381peak 20,38129 Mar4 Oct
20,752Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-01-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,017 below peak (20,381)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 636 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,110), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate45.9%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy14.2%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.031.050.03 short
Match win rate29.3%45.2%45.7%16.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKelm1FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,364 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning72
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateTLWWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility7.4
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels6.4
Clutch5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 75% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 75% on T to 53% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning7.2
Utility7.4
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels7.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time539ms−76ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 2 Oct →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · inferno, 10 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · nuke, 30 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2612–1446%0.03
infernoC207–1335%-0.01
ancientA149–564%0.01
mirageD124–833%0.02
dust2A116–555%0.05
anubisB63–350%0.03
overpass—43–175%0.01
cache—32–167%-0.03
debris—11–0100%0.07
vertigo—11–0100%0.04
eldorado—10–10%0.04
poseidon—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

137,197Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
11,716Matches
29.3%Match win rate
45.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
13,140MVPs
2,100Hours (in match)
4,172Bombs planted
1,185Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,323
AWP14,593
AUG3,403
SG 5532,990
SSG 082,834
MAC-102,780

Lifetime map wins

8,697inferno
5,271nuke
3,004train
2,191dust2
2,091vertigo
696lake
663cbble
271safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

163Matches
48%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
86.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4536%1.1518.1
Anubis2250%1.2717.0
Nuke1567%1.2019.0
Vertigo1258%1.3818.2
Inferno944%1.7420.4
Ancient967%1.4218.3
Train650%0.9616.5
Overpass20%0.7817.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
535msReaction time
74.6%T opening success
52.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
14.74HE damage / grenade
14.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0218%4 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0316%4 Oct →
cache13–80.0721%3 Oct →
dust213–60.0114%3 Oct →
nuke13–80.0618%3 Oct →
ancient5–130.0115%3 Oct →
mirage13–70.0313%3 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0012%3 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0019%3 Oct →
ancient13–100.0720%3 Oct →
anubis13–20.0916%3 Oct →
dust26–130.0418%3 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0411%2 Oct →
nuke13–50.1121%2 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0216%2 Oct →
ancient16–120.0315%2 Oct →
dust213–30.1711%2 Oct →
anubis13–110.0519%2 Oct →
dust214–160.0614%2 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0218%6 Sept →
inferno7–130.0325%6 Sept →
nuke13–90.0316%6 Sept →
ancient13–70.0917%6 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.1311%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0617%30 Aug →
dust213–20.0929%30 Aug →
nuke13–60.0119%30 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0220%30 Aug →
inferno13–80.1121%30 Aug →
inferno13–100.1120%16 Aug →
nuke10–130.0315%16 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0417%7 Aug →
cache0–13-0.128%7 Aug →
nuke13–100.0522%7 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0121%7 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0626%23 Jul →
overpass9–50.1227%23 Jul →
overpass1–9-0.249%23 Jul →
debris9–50.0717%23 Jul →
vertigo9–40.0430%23 Jul →
nuke8–80.0520%23 Jul →
eldorado8–80.0416%23 Jul →
poseidon9–50.1132%23 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.0523%23 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0236%10 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.035%12 May →
nuke6–13-0.0517%12 May →
ancient5–130.0111%12 May →
inferno13–11-0.0319%8 May →
mirage7–130.0220%8 May →
ancient11–130.0211%8 May →
nuke13–40.0926%8 May →
inferno13–6-0.0612%8 May →
dust213–50.0929%6 May →
inferno11–130.0220%6 May →
mirage15–150.0020%5 May →
dust27–130.0126%5 May →
overpass13–50.1616%5 May →
nuke14–160.0221%5 May →
mirage11–130.0214%5 May →
inferno13–6-0.0525%5 May →
nuke13–100.0816%5 May →
anubis13–90.0924%5 May →
cache13–10-0.0414%5 May →
inferno9–13-0.0429%27 Apr →
ancient13–80.0218%27 Apr →
overpass13–80.0211%27 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0417%26 Apr →
inferno13–30.0321%26 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0212%26 Apr →
nuke13–110.0723%26 Apr →
nuke15–15-0.0110%26 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.0721%23 Apr →
nuke9–00.0417%23 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.0417%23 Apr →
inferno13–30.1025%23 Apr →
nuke13–50.0514%23 Apr →
mirage13–70.0320%23 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0513%23 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0126%23 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0320%23 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0020%22 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0617%22 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0015%2 Apr →
mirage11–130.0330%2 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0513%2 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0115%2 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.0714%30 Mar →
nuke5–130.0521%30 Mar →
ancient13–110.1416%29 Mar →
nuke6–130.1427%19 Mar →
dust25–130.0010%19 Mar →
nuke13–60.0823%19 Mar →
dust216–130.1218%31 Jan →
ancient13–10-0.0218%31 Jan →
inferno9–13-0.0320%31 Jan →
mirage16–130.0416%31 Jan →
nuke10–130.0914%31 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.0119%31 Jan →
mirage13–90.0930%31 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.