MÖYKKY

MÖYKKY — CS2 Stats

FI76561198800557610[U:1:840291882]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,354Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,135Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,174Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#97137 of 259984 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,174 -1,305 12 Aug – 4 Nov · 31 days played
18,80521,387peak 21,38712 Aug4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,030 +0 1 Sept – 21 Sept · 3 observations
1,0301,030peak 1,0301 Sept21 Sept
21,387Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,030Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,213 below peak (21,387)
  • -520 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,305 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 826 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate43.0%45.7%46.8%3.8% short
Shot accuracy9.8%12.7%13.0%3.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.051.060.15 short
Match win rate51.6%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMÖYKKYFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,174 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,030csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning60
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.3
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning6.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time554ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 4 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 20 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · nuke, 2 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2413–1154%-0.01
dust2C198–1142%-0.01
ancientA149–564%-0.01
cacheC145–936%-0.02
infernoB137–654%-0.00
mirageC94–544%-0.01
anubisD62–433%-0.03
train—11–0100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

102,240Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
5,617Matches
51.6%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
43.0%Headshot %
9.8%Shot accuracy
12,977MVPs
2,423Hours (in match)
5,498Bombs planted
1,277Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

11,203nuke
7,607inferno
6,153dust2
4,289vertigo
2,814train
679cbble
448office
201lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

326Matches
54%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
78.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6261%0.7813.3
Nuke5256%0.8713.9
Mirage4848%0.7212.3
Anubis4547%0.7411.9
Dust23465%0.8514.4
Vertigo3345%0.7311.4
Inferno2560%0.8014.4
Cache1258%0.7712.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
66.9%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
554msReaction time
58.8%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
8.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–90.0620%4 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0324%1 Nov →
nuke13–70.0219%1 Nov →
inferno13–110.0120%31 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0214%31 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0211%31 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.026%31 Oct →
nuke15–150.0011%30 Oct →
dust28–13-0.078%30 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0215%29 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.036%28 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0516%28 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0127%24 Oct →
cache13–80.0619%24 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0625%24 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0218%24 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0318%24 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0516%24 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0110%24 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0018%24 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0913%23 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.029%21 Oct →
mirage4–130.0113%21 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0219%15 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0214%15 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0416%15 Oct →
mirage13–110.0013%15 Oct →
dust213–70.0325%15 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0315%14 Oct →
nuke6–130.0113%14 Oct →
nuke13–100.0322%11 Oct →
inferno13–80.0113%11 Oct →
dust210–130.0410%11 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0414%10 Oct →
train8–2-0.0625%10 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0915%10 Oct →
ancient13–100.008%10 Oct →
ancient13–110.0317%7 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0623%7 Oct →
ancient13–50.0311%7 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0625%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.0229%7 Oct →
nuke13–100.0116%4 Oct →
inferno13–50.1211%4 Oct →
dust213–60.0426%4 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0817%4 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.039%4 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0519%4 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0128%2 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0917%2 Oct →
nuke13–20.0316%2 Oct →
cache13–100.0121%2 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0113%2 Oct →
dust210–130.0114%30 Sept →
inferno9–130.0017%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.022%30 Sept →
inferno7–130.0814%26 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0115%26 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0310%25 Sept →
nuke13–110.0515%25 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0313%25 Sept →
dust216–130.0416%14 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0214%12 Sept →
nuke13–50.0713%12 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0515%12 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0115%5 Sept →
cache13–110.019%5 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0611%5 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0314%4 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0414%3 Sept →
dust213–50.1020%3 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0512%2 Sept →
ancient13–00.0612%2 Sept →
nuke13–1-0.066%2 Sept →
dust213–20.0226%2 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0611%29 Aug →
nuke9–130.0425%24 Aug →
dust25–130.0113%24 Aug →
ancient15–190.0113%23 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0514%22 Aug →
mirage11–130.0014%22 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0713%21 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0513%21 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0322%20 Aug →
nuke13–80.0215%20 Aug →
ancient13–80.0711%20 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0835%20 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0914%20 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0010%20 Aug →
cache13–100.0023%19 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0317%19 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0525%19 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0319%18 Aug →
anubis13–80.028%18 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0316%17 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0913%14 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0719%14 Aug →
dust24–13-0.088%14 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0515%12 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0514%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.