JAKE

JAKE — CS2 Stats

FI76561199297888201[U:1:1337622473]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,796Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,375Purple band · top ~15% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#97824 of 234305 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,470 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 26 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,375 -2,027 26 Jul16 Sept · 24 days played
18,37520,785peak 20,78526 Jul16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,470 +0 1 Sept7 Sept · 2 observations
1,4701,470peak 1,4701 Sept7 Sept
20,810Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,470Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,470
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 61 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,410 below peak (20,785)
  • -1,619 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,625 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJAKEFACEITLevel 7 · 1,470 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,375 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,470csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning50
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44542Last 10044%Win rateLLWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time546ms−117ms
first ⅓ avg 663ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 20 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · ancient, 28 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · nuke, 4 Sept
13–3Biggest win · mirage, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C28101836%-0.02
ancientS1812667%0.01
infernoA127558%0.01
nukeB126650%-0.02
mirageD124833%-0.01
cacheD103730%-0.02
anubisD82625%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

451Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
76.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28357%1.1014.8
Ancient6159%1.1215.9
Nuke5553%1.3915.3
Anubis4340%1.0914.1
Mirage3944%1.3513.1
Inferno2556%1.0716.2
Cache1650%0.9814.1
Vertigo922%0.9015.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
544msReaction time
25.7%T opening success
37.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
13.36HE damage / grenade
9.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.6526% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0119%16 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0221%16 Sept
cache13–110.0116%16 Sept
dust216–13-0.0131%14 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0027%13 Sept
inferno13–50.0838%13 Sept
dust27–13-0.0138%13 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0226%13 Sept
cache7–13-0.0512%13 Sept
dust28–13-0.0311%11 Sept
inferno13–80.0434%9 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0218%9 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0735%9 Sept
dust23–13-0.1014%8 Sept
ancient10–130.0228%8 Sept
dust213–100.0121%8 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0016%8 Sept
dust26–13-0.0721%7 Sept
dust213–80.0718%7 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0718%6 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0217%6 Sept
cache8–13-0.0914%5 Sept
cache13–11-0.0014%5 Sept
ancient13–100.0617%5 Sept
mirage10–13-0.069%4 Sept
inferno22–180.0216%4 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0128%4 Sept
dust28–130.0826%1 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0223%1 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0411%1 Sept
inferno16–140.0127%1 Sept
dust213–10-0.0720%1 Sept
cache10–13-0.0916%31 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0440%30 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0137%29 Aug
nuke19–170.0233%28 Aug
ancient13–50.0521%28 Aug
ancient13–110.0617%28 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0742%27 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0621%27 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0410%25 Aug
mirage13–30.0921%24 Aug
ancient15–19-0.0527%23 Aug
anubis2–13-0.017%23 Aug
anubis11–130.0033%22 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0111%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0625%22 Aug
cache10–130.0035%20 Aug
inferno13–80.1124%20 Aug
cache13–100.0429%19 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0413%19 Aug
dust29–13-0.0235%19 Aug
ancient16–120.0435%19 Aug
dust216–14-0.0115%17 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0326%14 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0119%14 Aug
cache7–130.0321%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0034%10 Aug
dust23–13-0.0414%9 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0416%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0226%9 Aug
ancient13–80.0427%9 Aug
anubis11–130.0324%8 Aug
dust213–11-0.0117%8 Aug
dust27–130.0023%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0219%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0614%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0421%5 Aug
anubis13–90.0419%5 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0323%5 Aug
anubis13–70.0214%5 Aug
dust27–130.0116%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0226%5 Aug
dust20–130.0425%5 Aug
dust215–15-0.0523%2 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0014%2 Aug
dust21–13-0.130%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.0617%31 Jul
dust213–60.0030%28 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0121%28 Jul
nuke13–60.0027%28 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0126%28 Jul
dust29–13-0.0516%28 Jul
ancient4–00.0350%28 Jul
nuke13–40.0515%28 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0325%28 Jul
dust210–13-0.0617%28 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0020%27 Jul
dust213–30.0727%27 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0313%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0023%27 Jul
ancient13–40.0523%27 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0111%26 Jul
dust213–6-0.0515%26 Jul
mirage13–90.0225%26 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0316%26 Jul
dust210–130.0329%26 Jul
cache11–13-0.0225%26 Jul
inferno13–50.0516%26 Jul
mirage13–100.0835%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →