keso

keso — CS2 Stats

FI76561197965098089[U:1:4832361]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,091Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,441Top 25% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35706 of 237507 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,534 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 23,441 → 23,441
0Faceit ELO · 1,534 → 1,534
+7Tracked matches · now 3,091
+3.3ppWin rate · 43.3% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 7 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,441 +6,053 7 Aug21 Sept · 22 days played
17,38824,414peak 24,4147 Aug21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,534 +0 30 Aug21 Sept · 4 observations
1,5341,534peak 1,53430 Aug21 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,534Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,534
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 217 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 973 below peak (24,414)
  • +3,441 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,559 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkesoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,534 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,441 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,534csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning64
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58411Last 10058%Win rateWWWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +80ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility4.5
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.4
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time586ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 12 Sept
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 4 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 13 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 2 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W4Current streak
146In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 79% over 19ancientWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2113862%-0.00
nukeS1915479%0.03
ancientC1981142%0.03
cacheC167944%0.02
anubisA127558%0.02
infernoS96367%-0.00
mirage42250%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

487Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
82.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8357%1.2117.2
Anubis6655%1.2118.1
Nuke6555%1.2118.6
Inferno5334%1.0616.5
Dust25151%1.0818.1
Mirage3030%0.8713.9
Overpass1776%1.4017.6
Cache1331%0.8414.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
582msReaction time
51.9%T opening success
49.6%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
14.57HE damage / grenade
4.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4877 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.0424%21 Sept
dust213–20.0534%21 Sept
nuke13–50.0711%20 Sept
dust216–120.0424%20 Sept
ancient5–130.079%18 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0129%18 Sept
dust25–13-0.0130%18 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0324%18 Sept
cache13–70.0627%18 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0318%18 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0216%16 Sept
cache13–11-0.0217%16 Sept
dust213–110.0223%15 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0615%15 Sept
dust216–130.0214%14 Sept
anubis14–160.0318%13 Sept
inferno13–50.0742%13 Sept
dust27–13-0.0741%13 Sept
cache7–130.008%13 Sept
nuke13–20.1632%12 Sept
cache10–130.0415%12 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0015%12 Sept
nuke10–130.0420%12 Sept
dust23–13-0.1010%8 Sept
ancient4–130.0318%7 Sept
dust26–13-0.0513%7 Sept
nuke13–100.0133%6 Sept
ancient7–130.0317%6 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0713%6 Sept
ancient11–13-0.039%6 Sept
cache8–13-0.0225%5 Sept
cache13–110.0335%5 Sept
ancient13–100.0322%5 Sept
anubis7–130.0531%4 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0425%4 Sept
nuke13–60.0235%4 Sept
dust213–60.0453%4 Sept
cache13–110.0426%4 Sept
cache10–13-0.0223%4 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0717%3 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0132%3 Sept
ancient13–110.0427%3 Sept
dust29–130.0126%3 Sept
nuke13–50.1320%3 Sept
inferno13–100.0320%2 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0324%2 Sept
ancient13–00.0121%2 Sept
dust28–13-0.0438%1 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0413%1 Sept
ancient9–130.0224%1 Sept
inferno16–140.0026%1 Sept
dust213–10-0.0326%1 Sept
cache10–130.0323%31 Aug
anubis13–70.0417%30 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0524%30 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0720%29 Aug
nuke19–170.0116%28 Aug
ancient13–50.0624%28 Aug
cache13–50.0232%26 Aug
dust213–6-0.0025%26 Aug
ancient10–130.0019%26 Aug
mirage13–40.0316%26 Aug
anubis16–130.0421%26 Aug
nuke0–7-0.0440%26 Aug
ancient13–10.0640%25 Aug
dust216–140.0118%25 Aug
ancient11–130.0219%25 Aug
cache11–130.0517%25 Aug
dust213–11-0.0216%25 Aug
inferno13–70.0125%24 Aug
nuke13–50.0424%24 Aug
dust213–10-0.0219%24 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0131%22 Aug
ancient13–100.0626%22 Aug
dust213–10.0117%22 Aug
anubis10–130.0321%21 Aug
nuke10–130.0620%21 Aug
cache10–130.0215%20 Aug
inferno13–80.0117%20 Aug
cache7–130.0316%19 Aug
nuke13–50.1045%18 Aug
ancient16–130.0425%17 Aug
cache15–15-0.0119%17 Aug
nuke13–90.0420%17 Aug
dust213–100.0725%10 Aug
dust214–16-0.0121%9 Aug
ancient13–40.1120%9 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0020%9 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0229%8 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0033%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0823%8 Aug
anubis13–30.0947%8 Aug
cache13–11-0.0021%8 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0445%8 Aug
cache13–80.0116%8 Aug
anubis11–130.0129%8 Aug
dust213–110.0223%8 Aug
ancient8–130.0919%8 Aug
anubis13–110.0215%7 Aug
dust24–13-0.0132%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →