Edi

Edi — CS2 Stats

FI76561198384795613[U:1:424529885]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

757Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,070Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+36Tracked matches · now 757
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,617 +1,178 7 Mar – 23 Apr · 20 days played
15,43920,000peak 20,0007 Mar23 Apr
20,497Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-03-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches48——
Win rate52%——
K/D0.96——
Headshot %43%——

Measured 18 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,030), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate39.6%46.8%48.2%8.7% short
Shot accuracy14.6%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.061.061.07meets
Match win rate44.1%46.3%46.9%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEdiFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning47
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–45–1Last 10054%Win rateWLLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility3.1
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 673ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.7
Utility3.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time663ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 680ms → last ⅓ avg 663ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 17 Mar →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · inferno, 15 Mar →
445msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · anubis, 10 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 21 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 17anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2715–1256%0.00
mirageA2715–1256%-0.01
nukeA1710–759%0.00
overpassC146–843%-0.01
ancientC73–443%0.01
anubisC52–340%-0.03
cache—22–0100%0.00
dust2—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

52,485Lifetime kills
1.06K/D
2,655Matches
44.1%Match win rate
39.6%Headshot %
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
6,518MVPs
1,206Hours (in match)
3,045Bombs planted
649Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,888inferno
2,626nuke
897train
547dust2
463vertigo
161lake
37ar_shoots
33cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

667Matches
51%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
75.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2882%1.3315.3
Mirage2326%0.8912.6
Ancient1547%0.9414.9
Nuke1464%1.5417.1
Anubis1354%1.3717.9
Dust21030%0.8614.0
Overpass667%1.3317.2
Cache560%1.0714.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
673msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
9.88HE damage / grenade
1.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4608 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9752% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass9–7-0.0517%1 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.0924%1 Oct →
inferno6–90.0922%1 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0731%28 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.029%27 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0016%23 Sept →
ancient13–100.0112%23 Sept →
nuke13–40.046%9 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.018%6 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0322%15 Aug →
cache13–20.014%17 May →
overpass13–110.0320%23 Apr →
inferno13–30.0215%23 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0516%13 Apr →
overpass13–100.015%11 Apr →
anubis1–13-0.0127%10 Apr →
anubis13–70.0114%10 Apr →
inferno10–130.036%10 Apr →
inferno13–80.0922%9 Apr →
overpass8–130.0218%31 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.0811%30 Mar →
nuke13–80.0422%28 Mar →
nuke12–16-0.0121%28 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.0610%28 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0514%28 Mar →
overpass13–90.0320%28 Mar →
inferno13–20.0829%28 Mar →
ancient13–80.0626%28 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0529%28 Mar →
ancient6–130.0619%27 Mar →
overpass4–13-0.0012%27 Mar →
ancient13–100.0428%27 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0520%27 Mar →
anubis13–50.003%27 Mar →
nuke13–100.0615%27 Mar →
inferno2–130.0332%27 Mar →
nuke13–4-0.0032%27 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0421%23 Mar →
inferno8–130.0331%23 Mar →
nuke13–40.069%23 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.1223%23 Mar →
mirage13–160.0120%23 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0111%22 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0311%22 Mar →
ancient3–13-0.0625%21 Mar →
inferno13–10.0817%21 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0214%21 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0119%21 Mar →
nuke10–130.0124%21 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0223%20 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0132%20 Mar →
inferno13–10.0433%20 Mar →
dust216–140.0411%20 Mar →
mirage13–30.0529%20 Mar →
nuke13–20.0515%20 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0426%19 Mar →
mirage16–13-0.0513%18 Mar →
mirage13–50.0424%18 Mar →
nuke13–100.0117%18 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.087%18 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0117%18 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0427%18 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0415%17 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0130%17 Mar →
nuke14–16-0.0316%17 Mar →
inferno13–70.0232%17 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0014%17 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0426%17 Mar →
mirage13–30.0015%17 Mar →
mirage13–80.1411%17 Mar →
mirage13–16-0.0332%16 Mar →
nuke13–80.0225%16 Mar →
inferno13–7-0.0319%16 Mar →
overpass13–11-0.0727%16 Mar →
mirage13–50.0119%16 Mar →
nuke13–20.0414%16 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.018%16 Mar →
mirage13–5-0.0524%16 Mar →
mirage12–16-0.0419%15 Mar →
mirage13–3-0.0217%15 Mar →
overpass13–110.0121%15 Mar →
inferno13–3-0.0137%15 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0411%15 Mar →
inferno13–11-0.0614%13 Mar →
mirage13–100.0714%13 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0613%13 Mar →
mirage13–40.0230%13 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0323%9 Mar →
overpass14–160.0334%9 Mar →
inferno13–3-0.0221%9 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0119%9 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0421%8 Mar →
inferno13–110.0130%8 Mar →
ancient4–130.019%8 Mar →
inferno13–50.0121%8 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0610%7 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0417%7 Mar →
mirage13–160.0321%7 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.029%7 Mar →
inferno13–7-0.0319%7 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.