xagro

xagro — CS2 Stats

FR76561198372275494[U:1:412009766]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

284Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,375Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,393Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87373 of 239628 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,393 → 19,393
+3Tracked matches · now 284
0.0ppWin rate · 46.2% → 46.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 16 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,393 +279 17 Jul15 Sept · 22 days played
18,03720,191peak 20,19117 Jul15 Sept
20,417Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-07-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 798 below peak (20,191)
  • -392 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 607 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches712−5
Win rate29%75%−46pp
K/D0.530.80−0.27
Headshot %50%65%−14pp

Measured 15 Sep 202623 Sep 2026; previous 9 Sep 2026 → 15 Sep 2026.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches43
Win rate51%
K/D0.74
Headshot %56%

Measured 29 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate41.8%44.3%46.9%5.2% short
Shot accuracy10.5%11.8%13.0%2.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.031.080.21 short
Match win rate40.8%45.2%46.7%5.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxagroPREMIER19,393 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning56
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43516Last 10043%Win rateLWWWTTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · −63ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 532 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 893 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility5.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.7

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time577ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 20 Aug
35%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · cache, 29 Aug
328msFastest reaction time · 4–0 · inferno, 20 Aug
13–2Biggest win · shelter, 20 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1971237%-0.02
anubisS1410471%0.00
mirageC135838%-0.01
cacheA127558%0.01
ancientD124833%0.00
infernoB105550%-0.04
nukeD91811%-0.01
train31233%-0.06
vertigo2020%0.02
office21150%0.03
overpass2020%0.00
boulder110100%0.10
shelter110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,331Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
2,666Matches
40.8%Match win rate
41.8%Headshot %
10.5%Shot accuracy
7,385MVPs
1,415Hours (in match)
1,509Bombs planted
1,259Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,527inferno
2,428dust2
1,858nuke
1,202vertigo
950train
353office
157cbble
153italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

97Matches
48%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
83.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1747%1.0716.7
Ancient1250%1.2016.8
Dust21136%0.8712.6
Nuke540%0.9616.0
Anubis540%1.1622.4
Inferno450%1.4515.0
Cache450%1.4617.5
Overpass2100%1.6018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
580msReaction time
46.3%T opening success
37.7%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.68HE damage / grenade
7.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.713% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0420%15 Sept
train13–10-0.0330%13 Sept
cache13–4-0.0125%13 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0027%13 Sept
vertigo12–120.0224%13 Sept
dust212–120.0321%13 Sept
dust213–8-0.0524%6 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0722%6 Sept
anubis6–2-0.0125%6 Sept
office5–13-0.0218%5 Sept
dust23–13-0.049%1 Sept
mirage13–100.0410%31 Aug
train12–12-0.0615%31 Aug
anubis13–60.0231%30 Aug
dust21–13-0.0735%30 Aug
ancient6–13-0.068%30 Aug
boulder13–50.1021%29 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0513%29 Aug
cache11–13-0.0135%29 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0711%29 Aug
vertigo12–120.0317%29 Aug
office13–40.0827%29 Aug
overpass9–130.0220%24 Aug
inferno2–130.0213%24 Aug
dust26–13-0.0316%23 Aug
ancient9–130.0216%23 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0012%22 Aug
dust24–13-0.0229%22 Aug
ancient13–110.0721%22 Aug
dust213–50.0626%22 Aug
anubis4–30.0023%22 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0332%21 Aug
anubis13–110.037%21 Aug
anubis13–90.0112%21 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0018%21 Aug
cache11–130.0921%21 Aug
cache13–80.0122%20 Aug
dust213–11-0.0121%20 Aug
ancient13–60.1116%20 Aug
ancient13–70.0216%20 Aug
cache13–70.0115%20 Aug
dust213–11-0.0318%20 Aug
inferno4–0-0.020%20 Aug
anubis11–40.0116%20 Aug
dust27–13-0.0719%19 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0222%18 Aug
ancient4–130.0220%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0728%17 Aug
cache10–130.029%17 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0215%17 Aug
dust213–6-0.0324%17 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0314%16 Aug
cache13–4-0.0019%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0029%16 Aug
anubis13–90.079%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0817%3 Aug
dust215–15-0.0321%3 Aug
dust21–13-0.0115%30 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0615%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0620%30 Jul
cache13–100.0423%30 Jul
nuke11–130.0126%30 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1129%30 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0811%30 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0127%30 Jul
dust213–7-0.0117%30 Jul
inferno13–7-0.044%29 Jul
mirage11–130.0515%29 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0229%27 Jul
cache16–130.0719%27 Jul
mirage13–110.0422%27 Jul
nuke5–130.0722%27 Jul
dust215–150.0122%27 Jul
mirage8–130.0413%26 Jul
mirage13–80.0418%26 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0219%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0322%25 Jul
train4–13-0.0915%25 Jul
nuke12–160.0214%23 Jul
nuke6–13-0.059%22 Jul
anubis13–50.0115%22 Jul
mirage1–13-0.078%22 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0913%22 Jul
nuke8–130.0211%21 Jul
dust28–13-0.0122%21 Jul
dust213–9-0.0014%21 Jul
cache11–130.0323%21 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0318%21 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0518%21 Jul
shelter13–2-0.0611%20 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0512%20 Jul
dust211–130.0324%20 Jul
cache13–9-0.0517%17 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0622%17 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0316%17 Jul
cache2–13-0.0514%17 Jul
dust27–13-0.0415%17 Jul
inferno2–13-0.1011%16 Jul
anubis13–40.0417%16 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0914%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →