sharko

sharko — CS2 Stats

MA76561198180431419[U:1:220165691]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

711Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,639Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,022Top 50% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98851 of 259780 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+687Premier CS Rating · 18,335 → 19,022

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,022 +7 25 Aug – 3 Nov · 31 days played
17,24319,824peak 19,82425 Aug3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 900 +0 3 Sept – 23 Sept · 6 observations
900900peak 9003 Sept23 Sept
19,898Peak Premier in tracked matches
900Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-08-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 802 below peak (19,824)
  • +1,779 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 978 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches6——
Win rate33%——
K/D1.17——
Headshot %48%——

Measured 28 Oct 2026 → 3 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate56.0%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy15.7%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.031.050.10 short
Match win rate40.6%45.2%45.7%5.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsharkoFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,022 · Purple bandPEAK ELO900csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning60
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–47–7Last 10046%Win rateTWWTLTLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −58ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 3–4–3 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 8–8–4 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.9° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time571ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–13 · nuke, 20 Sept →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · office, 5 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 2 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 1 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 21% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD194–1521%0.01
cacheA159–660%-0.01
infernoA149–564%0.01
mirageC135–838%-0.01
dust2B115–645%0.01
anubisS96–367%0.01
ancientB84–450%0.03
vertigo—42–250%-0.01
office—30–30%-0.03
boulder—21–150%-0.04
overpass—11–0100%-0.04
train—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,201Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,858Matches
40.6%Match win rate
56.0%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 6 players
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
5,952MVPs
1,032Hours (in match)
2,789Bombs planted
527Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,882
AWP3,207
SSG 081,676
MAC-101,630
MP91,479
AUG1,235

Lifetime map wins

4,827dust2
3,779inferno
1,208nuke
648lake
634vertigo
347train
266office
172cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

175Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
73.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2035%1.0214.3
Dust21771%1.0515.2
Mirage1533%0.8915.8
Nuke580%0.9213.4
Overpass560%1.1114.8
Cache540%1.1615.4
Anubis475%1.0216.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.9%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
571msReaction time
67.6%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
7.51HE damage / grenade
6.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke15–150.0412%3 Nov →
dust213–50.0721%3 Nov →
inferno13–110.0117%3 Nov →
inferno15–150.0015%31 Oct →
mirage10–130.0014%30 Oct →
office12–120.0128%29 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0421%25 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.0713%25 Oct →
nuke11–130.0926%25 Oct →
inferno13–110.0923%24 Oct →
cache13–110.0118%24 Oct →
dust213–40.0520%24 Oct →
mirage11–130.0014%23 Oct →
nuke13–60.1018%23 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0219%23 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0111%22 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0023%20 Oct →
mirage13–70.0427%20 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0117%19 Oct →
cache12–120.0413%19 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.045%10 Oct →
inferno13–40.0716%10 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0521%6 Oct →
dust23–9-0.0735%28 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.1421%24 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0433%24 Sept →
nuke9–130.1528%20 Sept →
cache13–80.0219%20 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0126%20 Sept →
anubis13–60.0420%20 Sept →
cache13–60.0028%19 Sept →
nuke6–130.1023%19 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0910%17 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0112%16 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0325%14 Sept →
dust211–70.0324%14 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0220%12 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0123%12 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0314%9 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.038%9 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0214%6 Sept →
nuke11–130.0022%6 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.1014%6 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0011%6 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0228%5 Sept →
vertigo13–90.019%5 Sept →
dust213–50.0311%5 Sept →
office5–13-0.0537%5 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0819%5 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0832%5 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0212%4 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.007%4 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.035%4 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0417%3 Sept →
ancient13–70.0114%3 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0813%3 Sept →
cache10–9-0.0018%3 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0025%3 Sept →
ancient8–130.0211%2 Sept →
nuke5–130.0525%2 Sept →
anubis13–70.0825%2 Sept →
mirage2–130.0618%2 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0310%2 Sept →
overpass13–6-0.0423%2 Sept →
inferno13–40.0528%2 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.1230%1 Sept →
inferno13–10.1312%1 Sept →
anubis13–90.018%1 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0011%1 Sept →
cache9–130.0014%31 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0711%31 Aug →
train12–12-0.0219%31 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0224%30 Aug →
ancient6–130.0422%30 Aug →
office11–13-0.0413%29 Aug →
boulder13–50.0223%29 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0113%29 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0418%29 Aug →
nuke13–70.0429%29 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.049%29 Aug →
cache13–100.0115%29 Aug →
ancient5–130.0110%28 Aug →
boulder10–13-0.0917%28 Aug →
dust211–130.0313%28 Aug →
mirage7–00.0510%28 Aug →
dust213–60.0314%27 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0213%27 Aug →
nuke14–160.0312%27 Aug →
inferno13–80.0716%27 Aug →
vertigo10–130.0726%27 Aug →
ancient13–110.1014%27 Aug →
mirage12–120.0113%27 Aug →
ancient9–130.0412%26 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0423%26 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0414%26 Aug →
cache9–130.0020%26 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0313%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0520%25 Aug →
anubis13–60.0814%25 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0422%25 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.