Pulse

Pulse — CS2 Stats

US76561198362532243[U:1:402266515]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,964Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,207Purple band · top ~15.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,517 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,207 +221 7 Sept – 11 Oct · 6 days played
17,91718,358peak 18,3587 Sept11 Oct
18,412Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,517Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,517
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 14 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 151 below peak (18,358)
  • -151 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,793 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPulseFACEITLevel 8 · 1,517 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,207 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,517csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning79
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateLTWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 453ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 482ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.1
Positioning7.9
Opening Duels7.1
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning7.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels7.9
Win Impact0.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time511ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 506ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 23 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · nuke, 10 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 10–2 · ancient, 29 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 14% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1812–667%0.05
cacheS1611–569%0.03
dust2D142–1214%0.01
mirageC135–838%0.00
infernoD134–931%-0.00
nukeS139–469%0.05
anubisS86–275%0.02
poseidon—31–233%-0.06
debris—11–0100%0.02
eldorado—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

635Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
78.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient14350%1.0416.4
Dust210548%1.0515.5
Mirage10351%1.0415.7
Inferno9748%1.1016.7
Nuke7455%1.0916.7
Anubis6348%1.0315.8
Train2560%0.9615.4
Overpass1233%0.6410.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
489msReaction time
67.8%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
11.20HE damage / grenade
12.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.441 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0713%12 Oct →
inferno15–150.1117%11 Oct →
inferno13–60.1144%11 Oct →
mirage11–130.0313%10 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0244%10 Oct →
nuke9–130.0750%10 Oct →
dust210–130.0122%10 Oct →
nuke13–90.1421%10 Oct →
mirage25–23-0.0030%8 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0514%6 Oct →
cache10–2-0.0640%6 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0222%6 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0417%4 Oct →
cache13–160.0120%3 Oct →
cache13–80.0319%2 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0230%2 Oct →
ancient13–80.0013%1 Oct →
poseidon5–9-0.0048%1 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0322%1 Oct →
ancient8–130.1011%30 Sept →
cache13–11-0.033%21 Sept →
nuke7–130.0627%21 Sept →
cache8–130.0910%20 Sept →
debris9–30.0225%20 Sept →
ancient8–130.0415%20 Sept →
nuke9–70.1719%20 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0519%16 Sept →
ancient13–70.0811%14 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0223%14 Sept →
inferno6–130.0510%14 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0031%14 Sept →
dust214–160.0724%13 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0220%11 Sept →
mirage10–130.0525%11 Sept →
anubis13–60.0820%11 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0832%11 Sept →
ancient8–130.0423%11 Sept →
mirage13–90.0327%11 Sept →
dust213–80.0717%11 Sept →
poseidon0–9-0.1717%11 Sept →
dust29–130.0519%7 Sept →
nuke13–90.042%7 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0121%7 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0712%7 Sept →
mirage7–130.0225%6 Sept →
ancient10–130.0340%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.0827%6 Sept →
inferno12–120.0116%3 Sept →
anubis13–50.0512%3 Sept →
dust23–130.0219%3 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.029%31 Aug →
ancient13–70.0418%30 Aug →
ancient10–130.0717%30 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0522%30 Aug →
cache13–40.1024%30 Aug →
anubis13–80.0724%30 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0333%29 Aug →
ancient10–20.0530%29 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0417%29 Aug →
cache11–50.0922%29 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0230%27 Aug →
ancient13–70.1113%26 Aug →
nuke13–90.0426%26 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0122%26 Aug →
ancient13–80.1123%24 Aug →
nuke13–110.0014%24 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.175%24 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0213%24 Aug →
ancient13–50.0919%24 Aug →
eldorado7–9-0.0624%24 Aug →
poseidon9–7-0.0126%24 Aug →
cache13–20.2118%23 Aug →
nuke13–110.0536%23 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0222%23 Aug →
dust212–120.0227%23 Aug →
cache13–110.0119%23 Aug →
dust212–120.0025%21 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0627%20 Aug →
cache13–90.0223%19 Aug →
cache13–80.0332%19 Aug →
nuke8–130.0526%18 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0324%18 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.1010%18 Aug →
mirage13–70.0527%17 Aug →
inferno13–100.0821%17 Aug →
mirage13–110.0216%7 Aug →
mirage12–120.0014%7 Aug →
ancient13–80.1022%7 Aug →
inferno7–130.0130%7 Aug →
ancient9–130.0021%7 Aug →
nuke13–70.0135%6 Aug →
cache13–30.0725%4 Aug →
mirage13–20.0535%4 Aug →
dust211–130.0823%4 Aug →
anubis13–50.0428%4 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0217%30 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0028%29 Jul →
nuke16–13-0.0132%28 Jul →
anubis13–100.0117%27 Jul →
ancient13–90.009%27 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.